RT @ColinMendelsohn: Well, well, well! Who would have guessed that @TC_BMJ had editorial bias? Ideology has no place in science Awaiting a…

@m_hef @TC_BMJ @MaloneRuth @SimonChapman6 What was TC response to Plos findings of bias? https://t.co/cDKryKki6i

RT @FloeFoxon: 1/2 Hi @TC_BMJ. New research in @PLOSBiology has identified editorial bias/nepotism in 𝘺𝘰𝘶𝘳 journal Tobacco Control (see S2…

RT @ColinMendelsohn: Well, well, well! Who would have guessed that @TC_BMJ had editorial bias? Ideology has no place in science Awaiting a…

RT @ColinMendelsohn: Well, well, well! Who would have guessed that @TC_BMJ had editorial bias? Ideology has no place in science Awaiting a…

RT @ColinMendelsohn: Well, well, well! Who would have guessed that @TC_BMJ had editorial bias? Ideology has no place in science Awaiting a…

RT @FloeFoxon: 1/2 Hi @TC_BMJ. New research in @PLOSBiology has identified editorial bias/nepotism in 𝘺𝘰𝘶𝘳 journal Tobacco Control (see S2…

RT @ColinMendelsohn: Well, well, well! Who would have guessed that @TC_BMJ had editorial bias? Ideology has no place in science Awaiting a…

RT @ColinMendelsohn: Well, well, well! Who would have guessed that @TC_BMJ had editorial bias? Ideology has no place in science Awaiting a…

RT @ColinMendelsohn: Well, well, well! Who would have guessed that @TC_BMJ had editorial bias? Ideology has no place in science Awaiting a…

Well, well, well! Who would have guessed that @TC_BMJ had editorial bias? Ideology has no place in science Awaiting a response from new editor @m_hef Well done @FloeFoxon

Well, well, well! Who would have guessed that @TC_BMJ had editorial bias? Ideology has no place in science Awaiting a response from new editor @m_hef Well done @FloeFloxon

RT @FloeFoxon: @TC_BMJ @m_hef @MaloneRuth @MenziesResearch Sad to see that @Clive_Bates did not make the cut, but looking forward to hearin…

RT @FloeFoxon: @TC_BMJ @m_hef @MaloneRuth @MenziesResearch Sad to see that @Clive_Bates did not make the cut, but looking forward to hearin…

RT @FloeFoxon: 1/2 Hi @TC_BMJ. New research in @PLOSBiology has identified editorial bias/nepotism in 𝘺𝘰𝘶𝘳 journal Tobacco Control (see S2…

RT @FloeFoxon: @TC_BMJ @m_hef @MaloneRuth @MenziesResearch Sad to see that @Clive_Bates did not make the cut, but looking forward to hearin…

RT @FloeFoxon: 1/2 Hi @TC_BMJ. New research in @PLOSBiology has identified editorial bias/nepotism in 𝘺𝘰𝘶𝘳 journal Tobacco Control (see S2…

RT @FloeFoxon: @TC_BMJ @m_hef @MaloneRuth @MenziesResearch Sad to see that @Clive_Bates did not make the cut, but looking forward to hearin…

RT @FloeFoxon: @TC_BMJ @m_hef @MaloneRuth @MenziesResearch Sad to see that @Clive_Bates did not make the cut, but looking forward to hearin…

RT @FloeFoxon: 1/2 Hi @TC_BMJ. New research in @PLOSBiology has identified editorial bias/nepotism in 𝘺𝘰𝘶𝘳 journal Tobacco Control (see S2…

RT @FloeFoxon: 1/2 Hi @TC_BMJ. New research in @PLOSBiology has identified editorial bias/nepotism in 𝘺𝘰𝘶𝘳 journal Tobacco Control (see S2…

RT @FloeFoxon: @TC_BMJ @m_hef @MaloneRuth @MenziesResearch Sad to see that @Clive_Bates did not make the cut, but looking forward to hearin…

@TC_BMJ @m_hef @MaloneRuth @MenziesResearch Sad to see that @Clive_Bates did not make the cut, but looking forward to hearing how Prof Hefler plans to address evidence of editorial bias/nepotism in the journal, not addressed by the previous EiC: https://t.

RT @payaljs: Editorial bias and nepotistic behavior: https://t.co/dzCDJX3rGI

RT @payaljs: Editorial bias and nepotistic behavior: https://t.co/dzCDJX3rGI

RT @payaljs: Editorial bias and nepotistic behavior: https://t.co/dzCDJX3rGI

Editorial bias and nepotistic behavior: https://t.co/dzCDJX3rGI

RT @FloeFoxon: @Clive_Bates @RetractionWatch @TC_BMJ A reminder also that out of 5,468 biomedical journals, @TC_BMJ has a greater index of…

RT @FloeFoxon: @Clive_Bates @RetractionWatch @TC_BMJ A reminder also that out of 5,468 biomedical journals, @TC_BMJ has a greater index of…

@Clive_Bates @RetractionWatch @TC_BMJ A reminder also that out of 5,468 biomedical journals, @TC_BMJ has a greater index of authorship disparity than 95% of journals, an indicator of editorial bias/nepotism https://t.co/wcjoVEvYUU

@JeremySussman https://t.co/dAYfOF5ePm

@carolsa_sa https://t.co/obtuksyvu2

RT @Chauhanlab_ILS: Stop nepotism in Science. stop #nepotisminscience . Kudos to authors of this @PLOSBiology paper for very clearly bringi…

@DrGilchrist https://t.co/YCg4Br4lVT

@ParentsvsVape @EurekAlert @GWtweets https://t.co/rMSeFmTcz4

RT @FloeFoxon: As always, great insight by @DrSarahEJackson, @robertjwest et al. Worth noting that the study was published in @TC_BMJ, whic…

RT @FloeFoxon: As always, great insight by @DrSarahEJackson, @robertjwest et al. Worth noting that the study was published in @TC_BMJ, whic…

RT @FloeFoxon: As always, great insight by @DrSarahEJackson, @robertjwest et al. Worth noting that the study was published in @TC_BMJ, whic…

RT @FloeFoxon: As always, great insight by @DrSarahEJackson, @robertjwest et al. Worth noting that the study was published in @TC_BMJ, whic…

RT @FloeFoxon: As always, great insight by @DrSarahEJackson, @robertjwest et al. Worth noting that the study was published in @TC_BMJ, whic…

RT @FloeFoxon: As always, great insight by @DrSarahEJackson, @robertjwest et al. Worth noting that the study was published in @TC_BMJ, whic…

RT @FloeFoxon: As always, great insight by @DrSarahEJackson, @robertjwest et al. Worth noting that the study was published in @TC_BMJ, whic…

RT @FloeFoxon: As always, great insight by @DrSarahEJackson, @robertjwest et al. Worth noting that the study was published in @TC_BMJ, whic…

https://t.co/Zl04QhBqlm

RT @FloeFoxon: As always, great insight by @DrSarahEJackson, @robertjwest et al. Worth noting that the study was published in @TC_BMJ, whic…

As always, great insight by @DrSarahEJackson, @robertjwest et al. Worth noting that the study was published in @TC_BMJ, which has a greater index of authorship disparity (an indicator of editorial bias/nepotism) than 95% of 5,468 biomedical journals: https

RT @IoanaA_Cristea: @RichLeePhD Check out our paper: https://t.co/cfW97iN2XY @Clara_Locher @NaudetFlorian @dmoher @deevybee

RT @markwarschauer: A survey of biomedical journals to detect editorial bias and nepotistic behavior | PLOS Biology https://t.co/UwXdOPMZJN

RT @IoanaA_Cristea: @RichLeePhD Check out our paper: https://t.co/cfW97iN2XY @Clara_Locher @NaudetFlorian @dmoher @deevybee

@RichLeePhD Check out our paper: https://t.co/cfW97iN2XY @Clara_Locher @NaudetFlorian @dmoher @deevybee

RT @deevybee: @syeducation @RichLeePhD see also https://t.co/Yaza9sqPCO

@syeducation @RichLeePhD see also https://t.co/Yaza9sqPCO

A survey of biomedical journals to detect editorial bias and nepotistic behavior | PLOS Biology https://t.co/UwXdOPMZJN

@JeromeVet @OdedRechavi and then they become highly cited researchers with a publication after every 5 days https://t.co/Ab18EMdj2O

@tdietterich @jmhernandez233 @roydanroy @RealAAAI https://t.co/Ab18EMdj2O Must read this study. Although it is about biomedical journals but this is also true in computer science journals

Raoult est nommé en intro. Ne le dites pas à Yann. https://t.co/bRHuBye7sY

RT @NaudetFlorian: Preparing a talk for the @irset_fr meeting tomorrow with the super cool @Clara_Locher ! Will use one of my favorite set…

RT @NaudetFlorian: Preparing a talk for the @irset_fr meeting tomorrow with the super cool @Clara_Locher ! Will use one of my favorite set…

RT @NaudetFlorian: Preparing a talk for the @irset_fr meeting tomorrow with the super cool @Clara_Locher ! Will use one of my favorite set…

RT @NaudetFlorian: Preparing a talk for the @irset_fr meeting tomorrow with the super cool @Clara_Locher ! Will use one of my favorite set…

Preparing a talk for the @irset_fr meeting tomorrow with the super cool @Clara_Locher ! Will use one of my favorite set of slides... "Busting a zombie trial in a post-apocalyptic world"... and Clara will elaborate on nepotistic editors (see here : https://

دراسة مثيرة تشير إلى إمكانية وجود ممارسات تحريرية مشكوك بها في عدد من المجلات العلمية التي تظهر تحيزا واضحا للباحثين الأكثر نشرا وتميزا #سرقوني https://t.co/IvBMFDc5VP

RT @NaudetFlorian: Followed by this massive survey in @PLOSBiology: https://t.co/Q5RbJOH377 :

RT @NaudetFlorian: Followed by this massive survey in @PLOSBiology: https://t.co/Q5RbJOH377 :

RT @NaudetFlorian: Followed by this massive survey in @PLOSBiology: https://t.co/Q5RbJOH377 :

Followed by this massive survey in @PLOSBiology: https://t.co/Q5RbJOH377 :

@giorapac @PLOSBiology @IoanaA_Cristea @dmoher @deevybee @Clara_Locher The answer is no😉. You can even have a look at the peer review process as it is openly available with @PLOSBiology. https://t.co/XlzMvftrxU

nepotismo @SebaDeBona @TimothyMSwartz @GleditschJason @lizardmanhuron @cannon_stefani

@KordingLab @bradpwyble @Raamana_ @NeuroPolarbear @atypical_me @tyrell_turing @andpru @neuralreckoning @R3RT0 @katjaQheuer @OHBM @IpNeuro That kind of behavior can already be picked out even in our fragmented, non-interoperable literature: https://t.co/9Ii

RT @biblioGetafe: This article identify journals that may show favoritism in accepting articles by specific authors https://t.co/yxJxAkIMvy

RT @biblioGetafe: This article identify journals that may show favoritism in accepting articles by specific authors https://t.co/yxJxAkIMvy

What not a surprise

RT @biblioGetafe: This article identify journals that may show favoritism in accepting articles by specific authors https://t.co/yxJxAkIMvy

RT @biblioGetafe: This article identify journals that may show favoritism in accepting articles by specific authors https://t.co/yxJxAkIMvy

RT @biblioGetafe: This article identify journals that may show favoritism in accepting articles by specific authors https://t.co/yxJxAkIMvy

RT @PLOSBiology: Massive survey of >5k journals explores relationship between hyper-prolific authors & journal editorial teams, finding a s…

RT @biblioGetafe: This article identify journals that may show favoritism in accepting articles by specific authors https://t.co/yxJxAkIMvy

RT @biblioGetafe: This article identify journals that may show favoritism in accepting articles by specific authors https://t.co/yxJxAkIMvy

RT @biblioGetafe: This article identify journals that may show favoritism in accepting articles by specific authors https://t.co/yxJxAkIMvy

RT @biblioGetafe: This article identify journals that may show favoritism in accepting articles by specific authors https://t.co/yxJxAkIMvy

RT @biblioGetafe: This article identify journals that may show favoritism in accepting articles by specific authors https://t.co/yxJxAkIMvy

RT @biblioGetafe: This article identify journals that may show favoritism in accepting articles by specific authors https://t.co/yxJxAkIMvy

This article identify journals that may show favoritism in accepting articles by specific authors https://t.co/yxJxAkIMvy

RT @PLOSBiology: Massive survey of >5k journals explores relationship between hyper-prolific authors & journal editorial teams, finding a s…

A quem interessar, segue o artigo publicado na PLOS Biology na íntegra... https://t.co/2EH8RN71Gk

Alongside the growing concerns regarding predatory journal growth, other questionable editorial practices have gained visibility recently. A survey of biomedical journals to detect editorial bias and nepotistic behavior https://t.co/yGwxFZ7tYL https://t.c

RT @Joaquin_Sevilla: El estudio de las malas prácticas en ciencia es ya un campo cientítico... con cosas muy especializadas, hay que estudi…

RT @matejoresic: Very interesting study ⁦@PLOSBiology. Top tier journals have issues due to editorial bias. Consequently, editorially favor…

siehe auch https://t.co/OL1P33rspz

"In most journals, publications are distributed across a large number of authors. Our results reveal a subset of journals where a few authors, often members of the editorial board, were responsible for a disproportionate number of publications" https://t.

RT @Chauhanlab_ILS: Stop nepotism in Science. stop #nepotisminscience . Kudos to authors of this @PLOSBiology paper for very clearly bringi…

RT @matejoresic: Very interesting study ⁦@PLOSBiology. Top tier journals have issues due to editorial bias. Consequently, editorially favor…

Good to have something that’s always seemed so obvious backed up by the data.

RT @Chauhanlab_ILS: Stop nepotism in Science. stop #nepotisminscience . Kudos to authors of this @PLOSBiology paper for very clearly bringi…

RT @matejoresic: Very interesting study ⁦@PLOSBiology. Top tier journals have issues due to editorial bias. Consequently, editorially favor…

RT @matejoresic: Very interesting study ⁦@PLOSBiology. Top tier journals have issues due to editorial bias. Consequently, editorially favor…

RT @matejoresic: Very interesting study ⁦@PLOSBiology. Top tier journals have issues due to editorial bias. Consequently, editorially favor…

RT @matejoresic: Very interesting study ⁦@PLOSBiology. Top tier journals have issues due to editorial bias. Consequently, editorially favor…

RT @matejoresic: Very interesting study ⁦@PLOSBiology. Top tier journals have issues due to editorial bias. Consequently, editorially favor…

RT @matejoresic: Very interesting study ⁦@PLOSBiology. Top tier journals have issues due to editorial bias. Consequently, editorially favor…