RT @matejoresic: Very interesting study @PLOSBiology. Top tier journals have issues due to editorial bias. Consequently, editorially favor…
RT @matejoresic: Very interesting study @PLOSBiology. Top tier journals have issues due to editorial bias. Consequently, editorially favor…
RT @Joaquin_Sevilla: El estudio de las malas prácticas en ciencia es ya un campo cientítico... con cosas muy especializadas, hay que estudi…
RT @matejoresic: Very interesting study @PLOSBiology. Top tier journals have issues due to editorial bias. Consequently, editorially favor…
RT @matejoresic: Very interesting study @PLOSBiology. Top tier journals have issues due to editorial bias. Consequently, editorially favor…
RT @matejoresic: Very interesting study @PLOSBiology. Top tier journals have issues due to editorial bias. Consequently, editorially favor…
RT @matejoresic: Very interesting study @PLOSBiology. Top tier journals have issues due to editorial bias. Consequently, editorially favor…
RT @matejoresic: Very interesting study @PLOSBiology. Top tier journals have issues due to editorial bias. Consequently, editorially favor…
RT @matejoresic: Very interesting study @PLOSBiology. Top tier journals have issues due to editorial bias. Consequently, editorially favor…
RT @WhiteRabbit36: No se podía saber: "Our results reveal a subset of journals where a few authors, often members of the editorial board, w…
Very interesting study @PLOSBiology. Top tier journals have issues due to editorial bias. Consequently, editorially favored authors can manage to publish there studies of poor quality. https://t.co/s3XedvLbCH
RT @Chauhanlab_ILS: Stop nepotism in Science. stop #nepotisminscience . Kudos to authors of this @PLOSBiology paper for very clearly bringi…
RT @WhiteRabbit36: No se podía saber: "Our results reveal a subset of journals where a few authors, often members of the editorial board, w…
RT @Chauhanlab_ILS: Stop nepotism in Science. stop #nepotisminscience . Kudos to authors of this @PLOSBiology paper for very clearly bringi…
@Fischblog @C_Holler sehe ich auch so https://t.co/OL1P33rspz
RT @WhiteRabbit36: No se podía saber: "Our results reveal a subset of journals where a few authors, often members of the editorial board, w…
It is a field of research every financing institution should support and implement to evaluate the research. We need more relevant project and less just for publications. https://t.co/mGRKWRcAc8
RT @WhiteRabbit36: No se podía saber: "Our results reveal a subset of journals where a few authors, often members of the editorial board, w…
RT @WhiteRabbit36: No se podía saber: "Our results reveal a subset of journals where a few authors, often members of the editorial board, w…
RT @WhiteRabbit36: No se podía saber: "Our results reveal a subset of journals where a few authors, often members of the editorial board, w…
RT @WhiteRabbit36: No se podía saber: "Our results reveal a subset of journals where a few authors, often members of the editorial board, w…
RT @fake_journals: "A survey of biomedical journals to detect editorial bias and nepotistic behavior" @PLOS @PLOSBiology @NaudetFlorian @Io…
RT @NaudetFlorian: ... and with the same team + @deevybee and Alexandre Scanff, a massive survey @PLOSBiology following this study and look…
RT @fake_journals: "A survey of biomedical journals to detect editorial bias and nepotistic behavior" @PLOS @PLOSBiology @NaudetFlorian @Io…
RT @Chauhanlab_ILS: Stop nepotism in Science. stop #nepotisminscience . Kudos to authors of this @PLOSBiology paper for very clearly bringi…
RT @WhiteRabbit36: No se podía saber: "Our results reveal a subset of journals where a few authors, often members of the editorial board, w…
RT @fake_journals: "A survey of biomedical journals to detect editorial bias and nepotistic behavior" @PLOS @PLOSBiology @NaudetFlorian @Io…
RT @Chauhanlab_ILS: Stop nepotism in Science. stop #nepotisminscience . Kudos to authors of this @PLOSBiology paper for very clearly bringi…
RT @Chauhanlab_ILS: Stop nepotism in Science. stop #nepotisminscience . Kudos to authors of this @PLOSBiology paper for very clearly bringi…
RT @Chauhanlab_ILS: Stop nepotism in Science. stop #nepotisminscience . Kudos to authors of this @PLOSBiology paper for very clearly bringi…
Stop nepotism in Science. stop #nepotisminscience . Kudos to authors of this @PLOSBiology paper for very clearly bringing this issue. Pllease RT https://t.co/dtNhNIBXsM
RT @WhiteRabbit36: No se podía saber: "Our results reveal a subset of journals where a few authors, often members of the editorial board, w…
No se podía saber: "Our results reveal a subset of journals where a few authors, often members of the editorial board, were responsible for a disproportionate number of publications."
RT @fake_journals: "A survey of biomedical journals to detect editorial bias and nepotistic behavior" @PLOS @PLOSBiology @NaudetFlorian @Io…
RT @fake_journals: "A survey of biomedical journals to detect editorial bias and nepotistic behavior" @PLOS @PLOSBiology @NaudetFlorian @Io…
RT @Joaquin_Sevilla: El estudio de las malas prácticas en ciencia es ya un campo cientítico... con cosas muy especializadas, hay que estudi…
RT @fake_journals: "A survey of biomedical journals to detect editorial bias and nepotistic behavior" @PLOS @PLOSBiology @NaudetFlorian @Io…
RT @fake_journals: "A survey of biomedical journals to detect editorial bias and nepotistic behavior" @PLOS @PLOSBiology @NaudetFlorian @Io…
RT @fake_journals: "A survey of biomedical journals to detect editorial bias and nepotistic behavior" @PLOS @PLOSBiology @NaudetFlorian @Io…
RT @Joaquin_Sevilla: El estudio de las malas prácticas en ciencia es ya un campo cientítico... con cosas muy especializadas, hay que estudi…
El estudio de las malas prácticas en ciencia es ya un campo cientítico... con cosas muy especializadas, hay que estudiar para seguir el tema...
RT @fake_journals: "A survey of biomedical journals to detect editorial bias and nepotistic behavior" @PLOS @PLOSBiology @NaudetFlorian @Io…
"A survey of biomedical journals to detect editorial bias and nepotistic behavior" @PLOS @PLOSBiology @NaudetFlorian @IoanaA_Cristea @dmoher @deevybee @Clara_Locher https://t.co/jOaMepJkd0 https://t.co/X1VtjQSsZK
@julimaelle @epsilon3141 @RetractionWatch Nur der Vollständigkeit halber: Raoult ist nicht nur wegen seiner HCQ Studien aufgefallen
@epsilon3141 @RetractionWatch „… the case of New Microbes & New Infections, an Elsevier jrnl, whose most prolific author, D Raoult, coauthored 32% of its 728 published papers. NMNI’s editor-in-chief & 6 additional associate editors of the jrnl work
RT @NaudetFlorian: ... and with the same team + @deevybee and Alexandre Scanff, a massive survey @PLOSBiology following this study and look…
RT @NaudetFlorian: ... and with the same team + @deevybee and Alexandre Scanff, a massive survey @PLOSBiology following this study and look…
That’s a fact
... and with the same team + @deevybee and Alexandre Scanff, a massive survey @PLOSBiology following this study and looking at indicators that may help to identify such nepotistic journals. https://t.co/Q5RbJOH377
RT @C0PE: Researchers explored the efficacy of two tools the Percentage of Papers by the Most Prolific author (PPMP) and the Gini index in…
RT @C0PE: Researchers explored the efficacy of two tools the Percentage of Papers by the Most Prolific author (PPMP) and the Gini index in…
RT @C0PE: Researchers explored the efficacy of two tools the Percentage of Papers by the Most Prolific author (PPMP) and the Gini index in…
RT @C0PE: Researchers explored the efficacy of two tools the Percentage of Papers by the Most Prolific author (PPMP) and the Gini index in…
Researchers explored the efficacy of two tools the Percentage of Papers by the Most Prolific author (PPMP) and the Gini index in identifying journals which showed editorial bias in accepting papers from specific authors. #ResearchIntegrity https://t.co/ZbN
RT @LexBouter: Another issue in #PublicationEthics : #Nepotism - some editors seem inclined to favor specific authors https://t.co/r01nERi…
RT @LexBouter: Another issue in #PublicationEthics : #Nepotism - some editors seem inclined to favor specific authors https://t.co/r01nERi…
RT @PLOSBiology: Massive survey of >5k journals explores relationship between hyper-prolific authors & journal editorial teams, finding a s…
RT @s4nuy3: @kperifanos @ElsevierConnect hello friend https://t.co/5qHqiUuMFC
@SmutClyde @RetractionWatch Thank you for keeping attention on this whole network of what @Clara_Locher et al call nepotistic journals. https://t.co/WkblsohkGJ
RT @RetractionWatch: A Q&A with the corresponding author of a study of nepotism in journals. https://t.co/T5GUThehYa (We peer-reviewed (htt…
RT @dirnagl: #PLOSBiology: A survey of biomedical journals to detect editorial bias and nepotistic behavior https://t.co/rwk6B5T9lE
RT @PLOSBiology: Massive survey of >5k journals explores relationship between hyper-prolific authors & journal editorial teams, finding a s…
RT @LexBouter: Another issue in #PublicationEthics : #Nepotism - some editors seem inclined to favor specific authors https://t.co/r01nERi…
RT @PLOSBiology: Massive survey of >5k journals explores relationship between hyper-prolific authors & journal editorial teams, finding a s…
RT @waltzer_lucas: A random sample was manually examined, revealing that the most prolific author was part of the editorial board in 60 cas…
A random sample was manually examined, revealing that the most prolific author was part of the editorial board in 60 cases (61%). The papers by the most prolific authors were more likely to be accepted for publication within 3 weeks of their submission. h
Une enquête auprès des revues biomédicales pour détecter les préjugés éditoriaux et les comportements népotistes https://t.co/vgJaEI2CFb
A survey of biomedical journals to detect editorial bias and nepotistic behavior https://t.co/vgJaEI2CFb
There is a subset of journals where a few authors, often members of the editorial board, were responsible for a disproportionate number of publications. Papers by the most prolific authors are more likely to be accepted within 3 weeks. … https://t.co/NYQwN
'Our results reveal a subset of journals where a few authors, often members of the editorial board, were responsible for a disproportionate number of publications'
A survey of biomedical journals to detect editorial bias and nepotistic behavior https://t.co/YE4HfXHwXD
"A survey of biomedical journals to detect editorial bias and nepotistic behavior" https://t.co/Q5RbJOH377 https://t.co/a8XSnE7RUQ
Interesting conclusions, among few authors responsible for a disproportionate number of publications, random sample revealed that the most prolific were part of the editorial board (61%), and were more likely to be published within 3 weeks #PLOSBiology: ht
Follow this link and read A #survey of #Biomedical journals to detect #editorial_bias and #nepotistic_behavior: https://t.co/OpkDHd6mBx https://t.co/vkItFV05UU
A survey of biomedical journals to detect editorial bias and nepotistic behavior https://t.co/YE4HfXHwXD
"Elsevier journal, whose most prolific author, Didier Raoult, coauthored 32% of its 728 published papers. NMNI’s editor-in-chief and 6 additional associate editors of the journal work directly for, and report to, Raoult " https://t.co/3Ggp3at9dG
RT @RinzeBenedictus: "Our results reveal a subset of journals where a few authors,often members of the editorial board,were responsible for…
RT @CAlvarezdardet: To enhance trust in their practices, journals need to be transparent about their editorial and peer review practices. h…
RT @JuliPereto: #PLOSBiology: A survey of biomedical journals to detect editorial bias and nepotistic behavior https://t.co/z6PB56PFi8 @Man…
RT @JuliPereto: #PLOSBiology: A survey of biomedical journals to detect editorial bias and nepotistic behavior https://t.co/z6PB56PFi8 @Man…
RT @JuliPereto: #PLOSBiology: A survey of biomedical journals to detect editorial bias and nepotistic behavior https://t.co/z6PB56PFi8 @Man…
RT @JuliPereto: #PLOSBiology: A survey of biomedical journals to detect editorial bias and nepotistic behavior https://t.co/z6PB56PFi8 @Man…
RT @CAlvarezdardet: To enhance trust in their practices, journals need to be transparent about their editorial and peer review practices. h…
RT @CAlvarezdardet: To enhance trust in their practices, journals need to be transparent about their editorial and peer review practices. h…
To enhance trust in their practices, journals need to be transparent about their editorial and peer review practices. https://t.co/XQG4KFMIko
Journals are biased in selection/favoring of the papers from their own members/editorial board! it is called LOBBYING! The appropriate Praxis would be to abandon publications from the own EDITORIAL BOARD team! https://t.co/UMmAOdjoPA
RT @JuliPereto: #PLOSBiology: A survey of biomedical journals to detect editorial bias and nepotistic behavior https://t.co/z6PB56PFi8 @Man…
Seria interessant replicar l'anàlisi xa altres àrees de coneixement / It would be interesting to replicate this analysis in other fields reserach 🤓
RT @JuliPereto: #PLOSBiology: A survey of biomedical journals to detect editorial bias and nepotistic behavior https://t.co/z6PB56PFi8 @Man…
RT @JuliPereto: #PLOSBiology: A survey of biomedical journals to detect editorial bias and nepotistic behavior https://t.co/z6PB56PFi8 @Man…
#PLOSBiology: A survey of biomedical journals to detect editorial bias and nepotistic behavior https://t.co/z6PB56PFi8 @ManuelPorcar1 @IsmaelMingarro
RT @RebeccaSear: A survey of biomedical journals to detect editorial bias and nepotistic behavior: "Our results reveal a subset of journals…
RT @RebeccaSear: A survey of biomedical journals to detect editorial bias and nepotistic behavior: "Our results reveal a subset of journals…
RT @RebeccaSear: A survey of biomedical journals to detect editorial bias and nepotistic behavior: "Our results reveal a subset of journals…
RT @RebeccaSear: A survey of biomedical journals to detect editorial bias and nepotistic behavior: "Our results reveal a subset of journals…
A survey of biomedical journals to detect editorial bias and nepotistic behavior: "Our results reveal a subset of journals where a few authors, often members of the editorial board, were responsible for a disproportionate number of publications" https://t.
RT @DrGilchrist: Worth a read. “The next step is therefore to describe this phenomenon [in a fine-grained way], notably by studying the qu…
RT @DrGilchrist: Worth a read. “The next step is therefore to describe this phenomenon [in a fine-grained way], notably by studying the qu…