RT @DrGilchrist: Worth a read. “The next step is therefore to describe this phenomenon [in a fine-grained way], notably by studying the qu…
RT @DrGilchrist: Worth a read. “The next step is therefore to describe this phenomenon [in a fine-grained way], notably by studying the qu…
RT @RinzeBenedictus: "Our results reveal a subset of journals where a few authors,often members of the editorial board,were responsible for…
RT @RinzeBenedictus: "Our results reveal a subset of journals where a few authors,often members of the editorial board,were responsible for…
RT @RinzeBenedictus: "Our results reveal a subset of journals where a few authors,often members of the editorial board,were responsible for…
RT @RinzeBenedictus: "Our results reveal a subset of journals where a few authors,often members of the editorial board,were responsible for…
RT @RinzeBenedictus: "Our results reveal a subset of journals where a few authors,often members of the editorial board,were responsible for…
RT @RinzeBenedictus: "Our results reveal a subset of journals where a few authors,often members of the editorial board,were responsible for…
RT @RinzeBenedictus: "Our results reveal a subset of journals where a few authors,often members of the editorial board,were responsible for…
RT @RinzeBenedictus: "Our results reveal a subset of journals where a few authors,often members of the editorial board,were responsible for…
RT @RinzeBenedictus: "Our results reveal a subset of journals where a few authors,often members of the editorial board,were responsible for…
"Our results reveal a subset of journals where a few authors,often members of the editorial board,were responsible for a disproportionate number of publications." Study in @PLOSBiology showing 'nepotistic' publication culture https://t.co/Q9jbf5uh1Z
RT @SilviaCDobre: Percentage of Papers by the Most Prolific author (PPMP) and Gini index (level of inequality in the distribution of author…
RT @dannykay68: HMMM: Our results reveal a subset of journals where a few authors, often members of the editorial board, were responsible f…
RT @dannykay68: HMMM: Our results reveal a subset of journals where a few authors, often members of the editorial board, were responsible f…
RT @dannykay68: HMMM: Our results reveal a subset of journals where a few authors, often members of the editorial board, were responsible f…
HMMM: Our results reveal a subset of journals where a few authors, often members of the editorial board, were responsible for a disproportionate no. of publications. https://t.co/VSMXHIyV22
RT @pitiklinov: "Nuestros resultados revelan un subconjunto de revistas en las que unos pocos autores, a menudo miembros del consejo editor…
Étonnant, non ? 😅
Nepotism in #science #research represents an increasing source of bias. "...a few authors, often on editorial boards, were responsible for a disproportionate number of publications." Article: https://t.co/Ydh73hL87I Breakdown on @ScienceBasedMed: https:/
RT @dirnagl: #PLOSBiology: A survey of biomedical journals to detect editorial bias and nepotistic behavior https://t.co/rwk6B5T9lE
#PLOSBiology: A survey of biomedical journals to detect editorial bias and nepotistic behavior https://t.co/rwk6B5T9lE
I suspect a few ecological journals would show comparable levels of nepotism if analyzed similarly. A subset heavily promotes views of their editorial board. #PLOSBiology: A survey of biomedical journals to detect editorial bias and nepotistic behavior htt
RT @PLOSBiology: Massive survey of >5k journals explores relationship between hyper-prolific authors & journal editorial teams, finding a s…
How to PPMP your h-index https://t.co/1KOjIDqm7D
#PLOSBiology: A survey of biomedical journals to detect editorial bias and nepotistic behavior https://t.co/wy08rZDrpz
"where a few authors were responsible for a disproportionate number of publications [.] most prolific author was part of the editorial board [.] (61%). The papers by the most prolific authors were more likely to be accepted for publication within 3 weeks"
RT @LexBouter: Another issue in #PublicationEthics : #Nepotism - some editors seem inclined to favor specific authors https://t.co/r01nERi…
RT @RamisOrlu: Would be interesting to see how these numbers are for @JFluidMech @PhysRevFluids and other fluids related journals.I suppose…
RT @moorepants: "Our results reveal a subset of journals where a few authors, often members of the editorial board, were responsible for a…
RT @jhpantel: Divest from hyper-prolific authorship worship. Mass production of an inflated # of "big" papers is a red flag for me (how man…
RT @moorepants: "Our results reveal a subset of journals where a few authors, often members of the editorial board, were responsible for a…
RT @moorepants: "Our results reveal a subset of journals where a few authors, often members of the editorial board, were responsible for a…
RT @ancientchildren: #PLOSBiology: A survey of biomedical journals to detect editorial bias and nepotistic behavior https://t.co/poH9yQ5Rnv
RT @moorepants: "Our results reveal a subset of journals where a few authors, often members of the editorial board, were responsible for a…
RT @RetractionWatch: A Q&A with the corresponding author of a study of nepotism in journals. https://t.co/T5GUThehYa (We peer-reviewed (htt…
A Q&A with the corresponding author of a study of nepotism in journals. https://t.co/T5GUThehYa (We peer-reviewed (https://t.co/ZoLekpq8Y3) the study.) https://t.co/vYmysnxo4d https://t.co/SODXWdvBco
Would be interesting to see how these numbers are for @JFluidMech @PhysRevFluids and other fluids related journals.I suppose editors are selected based on their publications in that respective journal so it’s maybe hard to distinguish whether it is correla
RT @PLOSBiology: Massive survey of >5k journals explores relationship between hyper-prolific authors & journal editorial teams, finding a s…
RT @moorepants: "Our results reveal a subset of journals where a few authors, often members of the editorial board, were responsible for a…
RT @autismcrisis: "Our results reveal a subset of journals where a few authors, often members of the editorial board, were responsible for…
RT @gbiondizoccai: While overall median Percentage of Papers by the Most Prolific author (PPMP) and Gini index are 2.9% and 18.3%, cardiova…
RT @gbiondizoccai: While overall median Percentage of Papers by the Most Prolific author (PPMP) and Gini index are 2.9% and 18.3%, cardiova…
A survey of biomedical journals to detect editorial bias and nepotistic behavior https://t.co/ML7APvVQXz
RT @PLOSBiology: Massive survey of >5k journals explores relationship between hyper-prolific authors & journal editorial teams, finding a s…
RT @moorepants: "Our results reveal a subset of journals where a few authors, often members of the editorial board, were responsible for a…
Insert sarcastically surprised Captain Kirk meme
RT @sarahRbakerDPH: Do journals show favoritism in accepting articles by specific authors? Would be interesting to see if this applies to…
I wish the results in this paper surprise me 😬
RT @jhpantel: Divest from hyper-prolific authorship worship. Mass production of an inflated # of "big" papers is a red flag for me (how man…
RT @PLOSBiology: Massive survey of >5k journals explores relationship between hyper-prolific authors & journal editorial teams, finding a s…
RT @PLOSBiology: Massive survey of >5k journals explores relationship between hyper-prolific authors & journal editorial teams, finding a s…
RT @ancientchildren: #PLOSBiology: A survey of biomedical journals to detect editorial bias and nepotistic behavior https://t.co/poH9yQ5Rnv
#PLOSBiology: A survey of biomedical journals to detect editorial bias and nepotistic behavior https://t.co/poH9yQ5Rnv
RT @PLOSBiology: Massive survey of >5k journals explores relationship between hyper-prolific authors & journal editorial teams, finding a s…
RT @ThomasAgoritsas: Isn’t that interesting… 🧐 A survey of biomedical journals to detect editorial bias and nepotistic behavior https://t.c…
RT @sarahRbakerDPH: Do journals show favoritism in accepting articles by specific authors? Would be interesting to see if this applies to…
RT @PLOSBiology: Massive survey of >5k journals explores relationship between hyper-prolific authors & journal editorial teams, finding a s…
RT @PLOSBiology: Massive survey of >5k journals explores relationship between hyper-prolific authors & journal editorial teams, finding a s…
RT @LuisaBorrell: Very interesting article regarding detecting editorial bias and nepotistic behavior in biomedical journals but something…
Very interesting article regarding detecting editorial bias and nepotistic behavior in biomedical journals but something that may apply to all journals.
RT @LearnedPublish: See also our article on home country bias of NEJM showing a disproportionate number of US articles compared to other si…
RT @ecomplex_lab: Such endogamic relationship btw authors & editorial teams is vox populi, but there is a need for evidence like this explo…
RT @pitiklinov: "Nuestros resultados revelan un subconjunto de revistas en las que unos pocos autores, a menudo miembros del consejo editor…
RT @FloeFoxon: 1/2 Hi @TC_BMJ. New research in @PLOSBiology has identified editorial bias/nepotism in 𝘺𝘰𝘶𝘳 journal Tobacco Control (see S2…
RT @FloeFoxon: 1/2 Hi @TC_BMJ. New research in @PLOSBiology has identified editorial bias/nepotism in 𝘺𝘰𝘶𝘳 journal Tobacco Control (see S2…
RT @FloeFoxon: 1/2 Hi @TC_BMJ. New research in @PLOSBiology has identified editorial bias/nepotism in 𝘺𝘰𝘶𝘳 journal Tobacco Control (see S2…
RT @FloeFoxon: 1/2 Hi @TC_BMJ. New research in @PLOSBiology has identified editorial bias/nepotism in 𝘺𝘰𝘶𝘳 journal Tobacco Control (see S2…
RT @FloeFoxon: 1/2 Hi @TC_BMJ. New research in @PLOSBiology has identified editorial bias/nepotism in 𝘺𝘰𝘶𝘳 journal Tobacco Control (see S2…
RT @FloeFoxon: 1/2 Hi @TC_BMJ. New research in @PLOSBiology has identified editorial bias/nepotism in 𝘺𝘰𝘶𝘳 journal Tobacco Control (see S2…
RT @jhpantel: Divest from hyper-prolific authorship worship. Mass production of an inflated # of "big" papers is a red flag for me (how man…
See also our article on home country bias of NEJM showing a disproportionate number of US articles compared to other similar journals. https://t.co/PfDlGn6H5f (free to read for members of @alpsp and @ScholarlyPub )
RT @FloeFoxon: 1/2 Hi @TC_BMJ. New research in @PLOSBiology has identified editorial bias/nepotism in 𝘺𝘰𝘶𝘳 journal Tobacco Control (see S2…
RT @ftmaestre: "Among the journals with the highest PPMP or Gini index values... the most prolific author was part of the editorial board i…
1/2 Hi @TC_BMJ. New research in @PLOSBiology has identified editorial bias/nepotism in 𝘺𝘰𝘶𝘳 journal Tobacco Control (see S2 Table), but not in @NTR_Journal & other substance use journals. Please state how you will address this serious allegation. https
RT @ftmaestre: "Among the journals with the highest PPMP or Gini index values... the most prolific author was part of the editorial board i…
RT @NaudetFlorian: Just out in @PLOSBiology, our meta-research paper led by the 2 fantastic Alexandre Scanff and @Clara_Locher with the gre…
RT @jhpantel: Divest from hyper-prolific authorship worship. Mass production of an inflated # of "big" papers is a red flag for me (how man…
"Among the journals with the highest PPMP or Gini index values, where a few authors were responsible for a disproportionate number of publications, a random sample was manually examined, revealing that the most prolific author was part of the editorial boa
RT @eturnermd1: “Our results reveal a subset of journals where a few authors, often members of the editorial board, were responsible 4 a di…
RT @PLOSBiology: Interview with author @Clara_Locher in @TheScientistLLC: "A common thread among the 1st articles supporting use of #hydrox…
Interesting #AcademicChatter here. Signs of self citation and manipulation of impact factors, nepotism amongst editors and abuse of peer-review. So basically not news (we all know it happens).
RT @PLOSBiology: Massive survey of >5k journals explores relationship between hyper-prolific authors & journal editorial teams, finding a s…
RT @PLOSBiology: Massive survey of >5k journals explores relationship between hyper-prolific authors & journal editorial teams, finding a s…
RT @PLOSBiology: Massive survey of >5k journals explores relationship between hyper-prolific authors & journal editorial teams, finding a s…
RT @BehavEcolPapers: A survey of biomedical journals to detect editorial bias and nepotistic #behavior https://t.co/AZzmH2eKYQ @PLOSBiology
RT @BehavEcolPapers: A survey of biomedical journals to detect editorial bias and nepotistic #behavior https://t.co/AZzmH2eKYQ @PLOSBiology
RT @PLOSBiology: Massive survey of >5k journals explores relationship between hyper-prolific authors & journal editorial teams, finding a s…
RT @PLOSBiology: Massive survey of >5k journals explores relationship between hyper-prolific authors & journal editorial teams, finding a s…
RT @DrGilchrist: @jkelovuori Yes. Laughed when I read in original paper that “papers by most prolific authors were more likely to be accept…
RT @RetractionWatch: A Q&A with the corresponding author of a study of nepotism in journals. https://t.co/T5GUThehYa (We peer-reviewed (htt…
“Our results reveal a subset of journals where a few authors, often members of the editorial board, were responsible 4 a disproportionate number of publications… The papers by the most prolific authors were more likely to B accepted…w/in 3 weeks of their
RT @DrGilchrist: Worth a read. “The next step is therefore to describe this phenomenon [in a fine-grained way], notably by studying the qu…
RT @DrGilchrist: @jkelovuori Yes. Laughed when I read in original paper that “papers by most prolific authors were more likely to be accept…
@jkelovuori Yes. Laughed when I read in original paper that “papers by most prolific authors were more likely to be accepted for publication within 3 weeks of their submission”. In the paper I reviewed👆 lag time was 8️⃣ days & it was “internally peer r