RT @JelteWicherts: “I’ll publish your paper if you publish mine” nepotism in the biomedical literature @dmoher @NaudetFlorian @IoanaA_…
RT @PLOSBiology: Massive survey of >5k journals explores relationship between hyper-prolific authors & journal editorial teams, finding a s…
RT @JelteWicherts: “I’ll publish your paper if you publish mine” nepotism in the biomedical literature @dmoher @NaudetFlorian @IoanaA_…
RT @PLOSBiology: Massive survey of >5k journals explores relationship between hyper-prolific authors & journal editorial teams, finding a s…
RT @RichardLehman1: "Our results reveal a subset of journals where a few authors, often members of the editorial board, were responsible fo…
Such endogamic relationship btw authors & editorial teams is vox populi, but there is a need for evidence like this explored in biomedical journals This type of analysis should be extended to other scientific disciplines #Academia #PeerReview
Important look inward for #scientific publishing and #Academia.
Welcome to human society! We hope you enjoy your stay.
RT @DRTomlinsonEP: ☣️ On: NARRATIVE CONTROL ‘Our results reveal a subset of journals where a few authors, often members of the editorial b…
☣️ On: NARRATIVE CONTROL ‘Our results reveal a subset of journals where a few authors, often members of the editorial board, were responsible for a disproportionate number of publications.’ #ScienceOrAdvertising #openscience #peerreview https://t.co/C1s
RT @PLOSBiology: Massive survey of >5k journals explores relationship between hyper-prolific authors & journal editorial teams, finding a s…
RT @ThomasAgoritsas: Isn’t that interesting… 🧐 A survey of biomedical journals to detect editorial bias and nepotistic behavior https://t.c…
"Our results reveal a subset of journals where a few authors, often members of the editorial board, were responsible for a disproportionate number of publications."
RT @PLOSBiology: Massive survey of >5k journals explores relationship between hyper-prolific authors & journal editorial teams, finding a s…
RT @gowrigopala: “Guidance for editors and publishers should be developed to delineate good practices and prevent obvious misconduct” Anoth…
Isn’t that interesting… 🧐 A survey of biomedical journals to detect editorial bias and nepotistic behavior https://t.co/44T64cvtUc
“Guidance for editors and publishers should be developed to delineate good practices and prevent obvious misconduct” Another reason for open peer review. The very fact closed peer review is still needed seems to speak volumes on integrity of science. Next
RT @deevybee: twitter thread summary of nepotistic journals paper
RT @PLOSBiology: Massive survey of >5k journals explores relationship between hyper-prolific authors & journal editorial teams, finding a s…
Massive survey of >5k journals explores relationship between hyper-prolific authors & journal editorial teams, finding a subset of journals that show signs of nepotism @NaudetFlorian @IoanaA_Cristea @dmoher @deevybee @Clara_Locher &co #PLOSBiolo
RT @NaudetFlorian: Just out in @PLOSBiology, our meta-research paper led by the 2 fantastic Alexandre Scanff and @Clara_Locher with the gre…
RT @AmirSariaslan: "Our results reveal a subset of journals where a few authors, often members of the editorial board, were responsible for…
RT @NaudetFlorian: Just out in @PLOSBiology, our meta-research paper led by the 2 fantastic Alexandre Scanff and @Clara_Locher with the gre…
RT @RickyPo: A survey of biomedical journals to detect editorial bias and nepotistic behavior https://t.co/I9fU5OjJUy
RT @MicrobiomDigest: "Our results reveal a subset of journals where a few authors, often members of the editorial board, were responsible f…
RT @ftmaestre: "Among the journals with the highest PPMP or Gini index values... the most prolific author was part of the editorial board i…
Nepotism in journal !🤦♂️
RT @Clara_Locher: Tant que les scientifiques seront principalement évalués en fonction d’indices bibliométriques focalisés sur la productiv…
One for @C0PE
It'd be good to know if these are top rank journals in their fields
RT @AmirSariaslan: "Our results reveal a subset of journals where a few authors, often members of the editorial board, were responsible for…
RT @ftmaestre: "Among the journals with the highest PPMP or Gini index values... the most prolific author was part of the editorial board i…
Vill du ha grov brottslighet och Sharia-lagar? Muslimer är judehatare och kämpar för Koranen och Sharialagar även Sverige. I bomb- och knarkländerna Afghanistan och Somalia (jfr Vårbynätverket; mord; Einár) är 99% muslimer. SD: Stoppa invandringen och
"The results reveal a subset of journals where a few authors, often members of the editorial board, were responsible for a disproportionate number of publication"
RT @JelteWicherts: “I’ll publish your paper if you publish mine” nepotism in the biomedical literature @dmoher @NaudetFlorian @IoanaA_…
"Our results reveal a subset of journals where a few authors, often members of the editorial board, were responsible for a disproportionate number of publications." Good to see this being empirically tested but it's hardly shocking. https://t.co/uPtFTubk
RT @ftmaestre: "Among the journals with the highest PPMP or Gini index values... the most prolific author was part of the editorial board i…
RT @ftmaestre: "Among the journals with the highest PPMP or Gini index values... the most prolific author was part of the editorial board i…
RT @LexBouter: Another issue in #PublicationEthics : #Nepotism - some editors seem inclined to favor specific authors https://t.co/r01nERi…
RT @LexBouter: Another issue in #PublicationEthics : #Nepotism - some editors seem inclined to favor specific authors https://t.co/r01nERi…
RT @LexBouter: Another issue in #PublicationEthics : #Nepotism - some editors seem inclined to favor specific authors https://t.co/r01nERi…
RT @ftmaestre: "Among the journals with the highest PPMP or Gini index values... the most prolific author was part of the editorial board i…
RT @NaudetFlorian: Just out in @PLOSBiology, our meta-research paper led by the 2 fantastic Alexandre Scanff and @Clara_Locher with the gre…
RT @ftmaestre: "Among the journals with the highest PPMP or Gini index values... the most prolific author was part of the editorial board i…
RT @ftmaestre: "Among the journals with the highest PPMP or Gini index values... the most prolific author was part of the editorial board i…
RT @JelteWicherts: “I’ll publish your paper if you publish mine” nepotism in the biomedical literature @dmoher @NaudetFlorian @IoanaA_…
RT @ftmaestre: "Among the journals with the highest PPMP or Gini index values... the most prolific author was part of the editorial board i…
RT @ftmaestre: "Among the journals with the highest PPMP or Gini index values... the most prolific author was part of the editorial board i…
RT @NaudetFlorian: Just out in @PLOSBiology, our meta-research paper led by the 2 fantastic Alexandre Scanff and @Clara_Locher with the gre…
Toutes similitudes avec la réalité seraient purement fortuites
RT @JelteWicherts: “I’ll publish your paper if you publish mine” nepotism in the biomedical literature @dmoher @NaudetFlorian @IoanaA_…
RT @ftmaestre: "Among the journals with the highest PPMP or Gini index values... the most prolific author was part of the editorial board i…
RT @ftmaestre: "Among the journals with the highest PPMP or Gini index values... the most prolific author was part of the editorial board i…
"Among the journals with the highest PPMP or Gini index values... the most prolific author was part of the editorial board in 61% of cases" Interesting findings about nepotism in journals by Scaff @NaudetFlorian @deevybee & al in @PLOSBiology https://t
RT @JelteWicherts: “I’ll publish your paper if you publish mine” nepotism in the biomedical literature @dmoher @NaudetFlorian @IoanaA_…
RT @Clara_Locher: Tant que les scientifiques seront principalement évalués en fonction d’indices bibliométriques focalisés sur la productiv…
RT @autismcrisis: "Our results reveal a subset of journals where a few authors, often members of the editorial board, were responsible for…
RT @NaudetFlorian: Just out in @PLOSBiology, our meta-research paper led by the 2 fantastic Alexandre Scanff and @Clara_Locher with the gre…
RT @PLOSBiology: Massive survey of >5k journals explores relationship between hyper-prolific authors & journal editorial teams, finding a s…
RT @NaudetFlorian: Just out in @PLOSBiology, our meta-research paper led by the 2 fantastic Alexandre Scanff and @Clara_Locher with the gre…
RT @PLOSBiology: Massive survey of >5k journals explores relationship between hyper-prolific authors & journal editorial teams, finding a s…
RT @LexBouter: Another issue in #PublicationEthics : #Nepotism - some editors seem inclined to favor specific authors https://t.co/r01nERi…
🔥 🔥 🔥
RT @PLOSBiology: Massive survey of >5k journals explores relationship between hyper-prolific authors & journal editorial teams, finding a s…
RT @MicrobiomDigest: "Our results reveal a subset of journals where a few authors, often members of the editorial board, were responsible f…
RT @PLOSBiology: Massive survey of >5k journals explores relationship between hyper-prolific authors & journal editorial teams, finding a s…
RT @Eric_Chevet: #PLOSBiology: A survey of biomedical journals to detect editorial bias and nepotistic behavior https://t.co/lCnAW8d0Ze
RT @PLOSBiology: Massive survey of >5k journals explores relationship between hyper-prolific authors & journal editorial teams, finding a s…
RT @PLOSBiology: Massive survey of >5k journals explores relationship between hyper-prolific authors & journal editorial teams, finding a s…
RT @PLOSBiology: Massive survey of >5k journals explores relationship between hyper-prolific authors & journal editorial teams, finding a s…
RT @PLOSBiology: Massive survey of >5k journals explores relationship between hyper-prolific authors & journal editorial teams, finding a s…
A survey of biomedical journals to detect editorial bias and nepotistic behavior https://t.co/I9fU5OjJUy
RT @PLOSBiology: Massive survey of >5k journals explores relationship between hyper-prolific authors & journal editorial teams, finding a s…
RT @PLOSBiology: Massive survey of >5k journals explores relationship between hyper-prolific authors & journal editorial teams, finding a s…
RT @NaudetFlorian: Just out in @PLOSBiology, our meta-research paper led by the 2 fantastic Alexandre Scanff and @Clara_Locher with the gre…
I AM SO SURPRISED BY THIS, THIS IS MY SURPRISED FACE. WHO COULD HAVE SEEN THIS COMING
Massive survey of >5k journals explores relationship between hyper-prolific authors & journal editorial teams, finding a subset of journals that show signs of nepotism @NaudetFlorian @IoanaA_Cristea @dmoher @deevybee @Clara_Locher &co #PLOSBiolo
A survey of biomedical journals to detect editorial bias and nepotistic behavior https://t.co/6Qa8P2c5Mz
'Our results reveal a subset of journals where a few authors, often members of the editorial board, were responsible for a disproportionate number of publications. To enhance trust in their practices, journals need to be transparent (...)' https://t.co/QR9
RT @iainh_z: Metaresearch published @PLOSBiology: A survey of biomedical journals to detect editorial bias and nepotistic behavior 👀https:…
RT @NaudetFlorian: Just out in @PLOSBiology, our meta-research paper led by the 2 fantastic Alexandre Scanff and @Clara_Locher with the gre…
Nepotism and editorial bias is a problem most associated with subscription/paywalled journals. (In this analysis only 5 out of the 100 'outlier journals' examined were DOAJ-listed OA journals)
RT @NaudetFlorian: Just out in @PLOSBiology, our meta-research paper led by the 2 fantastic Alexandre Scanff and @Clara_Locher with the gre…
RT @NaudetFlorian: Just out in @PLOSBiology, our meta-research paper led by the 2 fantastic Alexandre Scanff and @Clara_Locher with the gre…
Interesting article demonstrating some journals favour specific authors (and they are often on the journal’s editorial board). https://t.co/9FptwYprct
#PLOSBiology: A survey of biomedical journals to detect editorial bias and nepotistic behavior https://t.co/lCnAW8d0Ze
RT @NaudetFlorian: Just out in @PLOSBiology, our meta-research paper led by the 2 fantastic Alexandre Scanff and @Clara_Locher with the gre…
RT @LexBouter: Another issue in #PublicationEthics : #Nepotism - some editors seem inclined to favor specific authors https://t.co/r01nERi…
RT @LexBouter: Another issue in #PublicationEthics : #Nepotism - some editors seem inclined to favor specific authors https://t.co/r01nERi…
RT @NaudetFlorian: Just out in @PLOSBiology, our meta-research paper led by the 2 fantastic Alexandre Scanff and @Clara_Locher with the gre…
RT @autismcrisis: "Our results reveal a subset of journals where a few authors, often members of the editorial board, were responsible for…
RT @JelteWicherts: “I’ll publish your paper if you publish mine” nepotism in the biomedical literature @dmoher @NaudetFlorian @IoanaA_…
RT @NaudetFlorian: Just out in @PLOSBiology, our meta-research paper led by the 2 fantastic Alexandre Scanff and @Clara_Locher with the gre…
Another issue in #PublicationEthics : #Nepotism - some editors seem inclined to favor specific authors https://t.co/r01nERiHQP #ResearchIntegrity @WCRIFoundation @NRIN_Integrity @SurveyIntegrity @EmbassySci @sops4ri @dmoher @NaudetFlorian @IoanaA_Cristea
RT @NaudetFlorian: Just out in @PLOSBiology, our meta-research paper led by the 2 fantastic Alexandre Scanff and @Clara_Locher with the gre…
RT @NaudetFlorian: Just out in @PLOSBiology, our meta-research paper led by the 2 fantastic Alexandre Scanff and @Clara_Locher with the gre…
RT @Abraham_RMI: “Our results reveal a subset of journals where a few authors, often members of the editorial board, were responsible for a…
RT @MicrobiomDigest: "Our results reveal a subset of journals where a few authors, often members of the editorial board, were responsible f…
RT @JelteWicherts: “I’ll publish your paper if you publish mine” nepotism in the biomedical literature @dmoher @NaudetFlorian @IoanaA_…