RT @RickyPo: A survey of biomedical journals to detect editorial bias and nepotistic behavior https://t.co/I9fU5OjJUy

RT @MicrobiomDigest: "Our results reveal a subset of journals where a few authors, often members of the editorial board, were responsible f…

RT @ftmaestre: "Among the journals with the highest PPMP or Gini index values... the most prolific author was part of the editorial board i…

Nepotism in journal !🤦‍♂️

RT @Clara_Locher: Tant que les scientifiques seront principalement évalués en fonction d’indices bibliométriques focalisés sur la productiv…

One for @C0PE

It'd be good to know if these are top rank journals in their fields

RT @AmirSariaslan: "Our results reveal a subset of journals where a few authors, often members of the editorial board, were responsible for…

RT @ftmaestre: "Among the journals with the highest PPMP or Gini index values... the most prolific author was part of the editorial board i…

Vill du ha grov brottslighet och Sharia-lagar? Muslimer är judehatare och kämpar för Koranen och Sharialagar även Sverige. I bomb- och knarkländerna Afghanistan och Somalia (jfr Vårbynätverket; mord; Einár) är 99% muslimer. SD: Stoppa invandringen och

"The results reveal a subset of journals where a few authors, often members of the editorial board, were responsible for a disproportionate number of publication"

RT @JelteWicherts: “I’ll publish your paper if you publish mine” nepotism in the biomedical literature ⁦@dmoher⁩ ⁦@NaudetFlorian⁩ ⁦@IoanaA_…

"Our results reveal a subset of journals where a few authors, often members of the editorial board, were responsible for a disproportionate number of publications." Good to see this being empirically tested but it's hardly shocking. https://t.co/uPtFTubk

RT @ftmaestre: "Among the journals with the highest PPMP or Gini index values... the most prolific author was part of the editorial board i…

RT @ftmaestre: "Among the journals with the highest PPMP or Gini index values... the most prolific author was part of the editorial board i…

RT @LexBouter: Another issue in #PublicationEthics : #Nepotism - some editors seem inclined to favor specific authors https://t.co/r01nERi…

RT @LexBouter: Another issue in #PublicationEthics : #Nepotism - some editors seem inclined to favor specific authors https://t.co/r01nERi…

RT @LexBouter: Another issue in #PublicationEthics : #Nepotism - some editors seem inclined to favor specific authors https://t.co/r01nERi…

RT @ftmaestre: "Among the journals with the highest PPMP or Gini index values... the most prolific author was part of the editorial board i…

RT @NaudetFlorian: Just out in @PLOSBiology, our meta-research paper led by the 2 fantastic Alexandre Scanff and @Clara_Locher with the gre…

RT @ftmaestre: "Among the journals with the highest PPMP or Gini index values... the most prolific author was part of the editorial board i…

RT @ftmaestre: "Among the journals with the highest PPMP or Gini index values... the most prolific author was part of the editorial board i…

RT @JelteWicherts: “I’ll publish your paper if you publish mine” nepotism in the biomedical literature ⁦@dmoher⁩ ⁦@NaudetFlorian⁩ ⁦@IoanaA_…

RT @ftmaestre: "Among the journals with the highest PPMP or Gini index values... the most prolific author was part of the editorial board i…

RT @ftmaestre: "Among the journals with the highest PPMP or Gini index values... the most prolific author was part of the editorial board i…

RT @NaudetFlorian: Just out in @PLOSBiology, our meta-research paper led by the 2 fantastic Alexandre Scanff and @Clara_Locher with the gre…

Toutes similitudes avec la réalité seraient purement fortuites

RT @JelteWicherts: “I’ll publish your paper if you publish mine” nepotism in the biomedical literature ⁦@dmoher⁩ ⁦@NaudetFlorian⁩ ⁦@IoanaA_…

RT @ftmaestre: "Among the journals with the highest PPMP or Gini index values... the most prolific author was part of the editorial board i…

RT @ftmaestre: "Among the journals with the highest PPMP or Gini index values... the most prolific author was part of the editorial board i…

"Among the journals with the highest PPMP or Gini index values... the most prolific author was part of the editorial board in 61% of cases" Interesting findings about nepotism in journals by Scaff @NaudetFlorian @deevybee & al in @PLOSBiology https://t

RT @JelteWicherts: “I’ll publish your paper if you publish mine” nepotism in the biomedical literature ⁦@dmoher⁩ ⁦@NaudetFlorian⁩ ⁦@IoanaA_…

RT @Clara_Locher: Tant que les scientifiques seront principalement évalués en fonction d’indices bibliométriques focalisés sur la productiv…

RT @autismcrisis: "Our results reveal a subset of journals where a few authors, often members of the editorial board, were responsible for…

RT @NaudetFlorian: Just out in @PLOSBiology, our meta-research paper led by the 2 fantastic Alexandre Scanff and @Clara_Locher with the gre…

RT @PLOSBiology: Massive survey of >5k journals explores relationship between hyper-prolific authors & journal editorial teams, finding a s…

RT @NaudetFlorian: Just out in @PLOSBiology, our meta-research paper led by the 2 fantastic Alexandre Scanff and @Clara_Locher with the gre…

RT @PLOSBiology: Massive survey of >5k journals explores relationship between hyper-prolific authors & journal editorial teams, finding a s…

RT @LexBouter: Another issue in #PublicationEthics : #Nepotism - some editors seem inclined to favor specific authors https://t.co/r01nERi…

🔥 🔥 🔥

RT @PLOSBiology: Massive survey of >5k journals explores relationship between hyper-prolific authors & journal editorial teams, finding a s…

#EntreSoi

RT @MicrobiomDigest: "Our results reveal a subset of journals where a few authors, often members of the editorial board, were responsible f…

RT @PLOSBiology: Massive survey of >5k journals explores relationship between hyper-prolific authors & journal editorial teams, finding a s…

RT @Eric_Chevet: #PLOSBiology: A survey of biomedical journals to detect editorial bias and nepotistic behavior https://t.co/lCnAW8d0Ze

RT @PLOSBiology: Massive survey of >5k journals explores relationship between hyper-prolific authors & journal editorial teams, finding a s…

RT @PLOSBiology: Massive survey of >5k journals explores relationship between hyper-prolific authors & journal editorial teams, finding a s…

RT @PLOSBiology: Massive survey of >5k journals explores relationship between hyper-prolific authors & journal editorial teams, finding a s…

RT @PLOSBiology: Massive survey of >5k journals explores relationship between hyper-prolific authors & journal editorial teams, finding a s…

A survey of biomedical journals to detect editorial bias and nepotistic behavior https://t.co/I9fU5OjJUy

RT @PLOSBiology: Massive survey of >5k journals explores relationship between hyper-prolific authors & journal editorial teams, finding a s…

RT @PLOSBiology: Massive survey of >5k journals explores relationship between hyper-prolific authors & journal editorial teams, finding a s…

RT @NaudetFlorian: Just out in @PLOSBiology, our meta-research paper led by the 2 fantastic Alexandre Scanff and @Clara_Locher with the gre…

I AM SO SURPRISED BY THIS, THIS IS MY SURPRISED FACE. WHO COULD HAVE SEEN THIS COMING

Massive survey of >5k journals explores relationship between hyper-prolific authors & journal editorial teams, finding a subset of journals that show signs of nepotism @NaudetFlorian @IoanaA_Cristea @dmoher @deevybee @Clara_Locher &co #PLOSBiolo

A survey of biomedical journals to detect editorial bias and nepotistic behavior https://t.co/6Qa8P2c5Mz

'Our results reveal a subset of journals where a few authors, often members of the editorial board, were responsible for a disproportionate number of publications. To enhance trust in their practices, journals need to be transparent (...)' https://t.co/QR9

RT @iainh_z: Metaresearch published @PLOSBiology: A survey of biomedical journals to detect editorial bias and nepotistic behavior 👀https:…

RT @NaudetFlorian: Just out in @PLOSBiology, our meta-research paper led by the 2 fantastic Alexandre Scanff and @Clara_Locher with the gre…

Nepotism and editorial bias is a problem most associated with subscription/paywalled journals. (In this analysis only 5 out of the 100 'outlier journals' examined were DOAJ-listed OA journals)

RT @NaudetFlorian: Just out in @PLOSBiology, our meta-research paper led by the 2 fantastic Alexandre Scanff and @Clara_Locher with the gre…

RT @NaudetFlorian: Just out in @PLOSBiology, our meta-research paper led by the 2 fantastic Alexandre Scanff and @Clara_Locher with the gre…

Interesting article demonstrating some journals favour specific authors (and they are often on the journal’s editorial board). https://t.co/9FptwYprct

#PLOSBiology: A survey of biomedical journals to detect editorial bias and nepotistic behavior https://t.co/lCnAW8d0Ze

RT @NaudetFlorian: Just out in @PLOSBiology, our meta-research paper led by the 2 fantastic Alexandre Scanff and @Clara_Locher with the gre…

RT @LexBouter: Another issue in #PublicationEthics : #Nepotism - some editors seem inclined to favor specific authors https://t.co/r01nERi…

RT @LexBouter: Another issue in #PublicationEthics : #Nepotism - some editors seem inclined to favor specific authors https://t.co/r01nERi…

RT @NaudetFlorian: Just out in @PLOSBiology, our meta-research paper led by the 2 fantastic Alexandre Scanff and @Clara_Locher with the gre…

RT @autismcrisis: "Our results reveal a subset of journals where a few authors, often members of the editorial board, were responsible for…

RT @JelteWicherts: “I’ll publish your paper if you publish mine” nepotism in the biomedical literature ⁦@dmoher⁩ ⁦@NaudetFlorian⁩ ⁦@IoanaA_…

RT @NaudetFlorian: Just out in @PLOSBiology, our meta-research paper led by the 2 fantastic Alexandre Scanff and @Clara_Locher with the gre…

Another issue in #PublicationEthics : #Nepotism - some editors seem inclined to favor specific authors https://t.co/r01nERiHQP #ResearchIntegrity @WCRIFoundation @NRIN_Integrity @SurveyIntegrity @EmbassySci @sops4ri @dmoher @NaudetFlorian @IoanaA_Cristea

RT @NaudetFlorian: Just out in @PLOSBiology, our meta-research paper led by the 2 fantastic Alexandre Scanff and @Clara_Locher with the gre…

RT @NaudetFlorian: Just out in @PLOSBiology, our meta-research paper led by the 2 fantastic Alexandre Scanff and @Clara_Locher with the gre…

RT @Abraham_RMI: “Our results reveal a subset of journals where a few authors, often members of the editorial board, were responsible for a…

RT @MicrobiomDigest: "Our results reveal a subset of journals where a few authors, often members of the editorial board, were responsible f…

RT @JelteWicherts: “I’ll publish your paper if you publish mine” nepotism in the biomedical literature ⁦@dmoher⁩ ⁦@NaudetFlorian⁩ ⁦@IoanaA_…

RT @ESanganyado: Editorial bias promotes hyper prolific publishing. But it's effect aren't felt only in promotion, rewards & recognitions -…

RT @JelteWicherts: “I’ll publish your paper if you publish mine” nepotism in the biomedical literature ⁦@dmoher⁩ ⁦@NaudetFlorian⁩ ⁦@IoanaA_…

RT @RHRLeBlanc: “This phenomenon suggests a risk of instrumentalization, if not corruption, of the scientific enterprise, by using journals…

RT @serchenheim: "...a random sample was manually examined, revealing that the most prolific author was part of the editorial board in 60 c…

RT @lurker_tech: great paper quantifying the "nepotism" phenomenon we all know exists for non-blind review

RT @JelteWicherts: “I’ll publish your paper if you publish mine” nepotism in the biomedical literature ⁦@dmoher⁩ ⁦@NaudetFlorian⁩ ⁦@IoanaA_…

“I’ll publish your paper if you publish mine” nepotism in the biomedical literature ⁦@dmoher⁩ ⁦@NaudetFlorian⁩ ⁦@IoanaA_Cristea⁩ ⁦@deevybee⁩ https://t.co/qpx9DaxD9q

RT @NaudetFlorian: Just out in @PLOSBiology, our meta-research paper led by the 2 fantastic Alexandre Scanff and @Clara_Locher with the gre…

Serve us the tea Justin!!!

RT @MicrobiomDigest: "Our results reveal a subset of journals where a few authors, often members of the editorial board, were responsible f…

RT @daforerog: A survey of biomedical journals to detect editorial bias and nepotistic behavior https://t.co/eItKrOT7EM @deevybee

great paper quantifying the "nepotism" phenomenon we all know exists for non-blind review

An interesting look at publishing. The study found that “a subset of journals where a few authors, often members of the editorial board, were responsible for a disproportionate number of publications.” It's open access. #AcademicTwitter https://t.co/

RT @autismcrisis: "Our results reveal a subset of journals where a few authors, often members of the editorial board, were responsible for…

“This phenomenon suggests a risk of instrumentalization, if not corruption, of the scientific enterprise, by using journals as a “publication laundry” for “vanity publication” by authors closely related to the editorial board.” https://t.co/PB3PXczvfC

"Our results reveal a subset of journals where a few authors, often members of the editorial board, were responsible for a disproportionate number of publications" https://t.co/0aTEQ931OQ autism-relevant, from @deevybee & @IoanaA_Cristea et al

Here’s the original publication: https://t.co/WvvdcVPUyu

RT @MicrobiomDigest: "Our results reveal a subset of journals where a few authors, often members of the editorial board, were responsible f…

RT @NaudetFlorian: Just out in @PLOSBiology, our meta-research paper led by the 2 fantastic Alexandre Scanff and @Clara_Locher with the gre…

RT @MicrobiomDigest: "Our results reveal a subset of journals where a few authors, often members of the editorial board, were responsible f…

Mezü-herroka bat, irakurtekoa / Un thread à lire.

RT @MicrobiomDigest: "Our results reveal a subset of journals where a few authors, often members of the editorial board, were responsible f…

Editorial bias promotes hyper prolific publishing. But it's effect aren't felt only in promotion, rewards & recognitions - they have contributed to the death of thousands of people due to COVID. Who are the real predatory publishers? https://t.co/ewERz