RT @jhpantel: Divest from hyper-prolific authorship worship. Mass production of an inflated # of "big" papers is a red flag for me (how man…
RT @jhpantel: Divest from hyper-prolific authorship worship. Mass production of an inflated # of "big" papers is a red flag for me (how man…
RT @jhpantel: Divest from hyper-prolific authorship worship. Mass production of an inflated # of "big" papers is a red flag for me (how man…
RT @jhpantel: Divest from hyper-prolific authorship worship. Mass production of an inflated # of "big" papers is a red flag for me (how man…
RT @ftmaestre: "Among the journals with the highest PPMP or Gini index values... the most prolific author was part of the editorial board i…
RT @MicrobiomDigest: "Our results reveal a subset of journals where a few authors, often members of the editorial board, were responsible f…
RT @jhpantel: Divest from hyper-prolific authorship worship. Mass production of an inflated # of "big" papers is a red flag for me (how man…
RT @PLOSBiology: Massive survey of >5k journals explores relationship between hyper-prolific authors & journal editorial teams, finding a s…
RT @LexBouter: Another issue in #PublicationEthics : #Nepotism - some editors seem inclined to favor specific authors https://t.co/r01nERi…
RT @DrJ56013122: “Our results underscore possible problematic relationships between authors who sit on editorial boards and decision-making…
“Our results underscore possible problematic relationships between authors who sit on editorial boards and decision-making editors.” https://t.co/UDXoZrW0hn
RT @PLOSBiology: Massive survey of >5k journals explores relationship between hyper-prolific authors & journal editorial teams, finding a s…
RT @PLOSBiology: Massive survey of >5k journals explores relationship between hyper-prolific authors & journal editorial teams, finding a s…
RT @jhpantel: Divest from hyper-prolific authorship worship. Mass production of an inflated # of "big" papers is a red flag for me (how man…
RT @ftmaestre: "Among the journals with the highest PPMP or Gini index values... the most prolific author was part of the editorial board i…
Percentage of Papers by the Most Prolific author (PPMP) and Gini index (level of inequality in the distribution of authorship among authors) used to identify #journals that may show favoritism in accepting #articles by specific #authors. https://t.co/DDrr
Is there any industry that studies itself as intensely as academic publishing does?
RT @jhpantel: Divest from hyper-prolific authorship worship. Mass production of an inflated # of "big" papers is a red flag for me (how man…
RT @jhpantel: Divest from hyper-prolific authorship worship. Mass production of an inflated # of "big" papers is a red flag for me (how man…
RT @PLOSBiology: Massive survey of >5k journals explores relationship between hyper-prolific authors & journal editorial teams, finding a s…
RT @jhpantel: Divest from hyper-prolific authorship worship. Mass production of an inflated # of "big" papers is a red flag for me (how man…
RT @jhpantel: Divest from hyper-prolific authorship worship. Mass production of an inflated # of "big" papers is a red flag for me (how man…
Divest from hyper-prolific authorship worship. Mass production of an inflated # of "big" papers is a red flag for me (how many are exploited for that PI to stay on top?) Same with the EEB "rising star" concept, out with it. We shouldn't be churning out pa
RT @ftmaestre: "Among the journals with the highest PPMP or Gini index values... the most prolific author was part of the editorial board i…
A survey of biomedical journals to detect editorial bias and nepotistic behavior https://t.co/1zrr2OejFP
RT @RichardLehman1: "Our results reveal a subset of journals where a few authors, often members of the editorial board, were responsible fo…
RT @ThomasAgoritsas: Isn’t that interesting… 🧐 A survey of biomedical journals to detect editorial bias and nepotistic behavior https://t.c…
A survey of biomedical journals to detect editorial bias and nepotistic behavior https://t.co/fJ6oUpuT0l via @NaudetFlorian et al
RT @PLOSBiology: Massive survey of >5k journals explores relationship between hyper-prolific authors & journal editorial teams, finding a s…
RT @sarahRbakerDPH: Do journals show favoritism in accepting articles by specific authors? Would be interesting to see if this applies to…
RT @PLOSBiology: Massive survey of >5k journals explores relationship between hyper-prolific authors & journal editorial teams, finding a s…
RT @ftmaestre: "Among the journals with the highest PPMP or Gini index values... the most prolific author was part of the editorial board i…
RT @sawsharkman: I AM SO SURPRISED BY THIS, THIS IS MY SURPRISED FACE. WHO COULD HAVE SEEN THIS COMING
RT @ThomasAgoritsas: Isn’t that interesting… 🧐 A survey of biomedical journals to detect editorial bias and nepotistic behavior https://t.c…
RT @RichardLehman1: "Our results reveal a subset of journals where a few authors, often members of the editorial board, were responsible fo…
RT @ftmaestre: "Among the journals with the highest PPMP or Gini index values... the most prolific author was part of the editorial board i…
RT @gbiondizoccai: While overall median Percentage of Papers by the Most Prolific author (PPMP) and Gini index are 2.9% and 18.3%, cardiova…
RT @GarmireGroup: Am I the only one not surprised by this finding that some editorial board members get green light to #publish prolificall…
RT @PLOSBiology: Massive survey of >5k journals explores relationship between hyper-prolific authors & journal editorial teams, finding a s…
RT @PLOSBiology: Massive survey of >5k journals explores relationship between hyper-prolific authors & journal editorial teams, finding a s…
RT @Clara_Locher: [🛑 STOP SCROLLING 🛑] And read this thread! Ok ok... that’s self-promotion! But which is restrictif to social media 😉
RT @autismcrisis: "Our results reveal a subset of journals where a few authors, often members of the editorial board, were responsible for…
Really ??? 🤣🤣🤣
RT @ftmaestre: "Among the journals with the highest PPMP or Gini index values... the most prolific author was part of the editorial board i…
RT @Big_Biology: Important look inward for #scientific publishing and #Academia.
RT @pitiklinov: "Nuestros resultados revelan un subconjunto de revistas en las que unos pocos autores, a menudo miembros del consejo editor…
How novel !
RT @Clara_Locher: [🛑 STOP SCROLLING 🛑] And read this thread! Ok ok... that’s self-promotion! But which is restrictif to social media 😉
[🛑 STOP SCROLLING 🛑] And read this thread! Ok ok... that’s self-promotion! But which is restrictif to social media 😉
A survey of authorship in biomedical journals has revealed some journals with a large percentage of papers by prolific authors, who often sit on the editorial boards (via @PLOSblogs) #SpectrumSpotted https://t.co/4aRiMfLmBp
RT @pitiklinov: "Nuestros resultados revelan un subconjunto de revistas en las que unos pocos autores, a menudo miembros del consejo editor…
RT @NaudetFlorian: Just out in @PLOSBiology, our meta-research paper led by the 2 fantastic Alexandre Scanff and @Clara_Locher with the gre…
RT @NaudetFlorian: Just out in @PLOSBiology, our meta-research paper led by the 2 fantastic Alexandre Scanff and @Clara_Locher with the gre…
RT @pitiklinov: "Nuestros resultados revelan un subconjunto de revistas en las que unos pocos autores, a menudo miembros del consejo editor…
RT @PLOSBiology: Massive survey of >5k journals explores relationship between hyper-prolific authors & journal editorial teams, finding a s…
"Nuestros resultados revelan un subconjunto de revistas en las que unos pocos autores, a menudo miembros del consejo editorial, fueron responsables de un número desproporcionado de publicaciones".
"Alongside the growing concerns regarding predatory journal growth, other questionable editorial practices have gained visibility recently." Interesting study, should be extended to integrity research. Do you think it's going to be any different? https://t
RT @PLOSBiology: Massive survey of >5k journals explores relationship between hyper-prolific authors & journal editorial teams, finding a s…
Massive survey of >5k journals explores relationship between hyper-prolific authors & journal editorial teams, finding a subset of journals that show signs of nepotism @NaudetFlorian @IoanaA_Cristea @dmoher @deevybee @Clara_Locher &co #PLOSBiolo
While overall median Percentage of Papers by the Most Prolific author (PPMP) and Gini index are 2.9% and 18.3%, cardiovascular journals have worse values: PPMP 3.5%, Gini index 28.4% (when focusing only on original articles: 5.5% and 24.9%). https://t.co/H
RT @BehavEcolPapers: A survey of biomedical journals to detect editorial bias and nepotistic #behavior https://t.co/AZzmH2eKYQ @PLOSBiology
Do journals show favoritism in accepting articles by specific authors? Would be interesting to see if this applies to oral and dental journals and, if so, which? A survey of biomedical journals to detect editorial bias and nepotistic behavior https://t.
RT @LexBouter: Another issue in #PublicationEthics : #Nepotism - some editors seem inclined to favor specific authors https://t.co/r01nERi…
RT @ESanganyado: Editorial bias promotes hyper prolific publishing. But it's effect aren't felt only in promotion, rewards & recognitions -…
A survey of biomedical journals to detect editorial bias and nepotistic #behavior https://t.co/AZzmH2eKYQ @PLOSBiology
RT @PLOSBiology: Massive survey of >5k journals explores relationship between hyper-prolific authors & journal editorial teams, finding a s…
RT @DRTomlinsonEP: ☣️ On: NARRATIVE CONTROL ‘Our results reveal a subset of journals where a few authors, often members of the editorial b…
🤔🤔🤔🧐🧐🧐😳😳😳
#PLOSBiology: "A survey of biomedical journals to detect editorial bias and nepotistic behavior". 🤔Am I surprised? Not really... https://t.co/nRUoxJatFB
RT @AmirSariaslan: "Our results reveal a subset of journals where a few authors, often members of the editorial board, were responsible for…
RT @PLOSBiology: Massive survey of >5k journals explores relationship between hyper-prolific authors & journal editorial teams, finding a s…
RT @ecomplex_lab: Such endogamic relationship btw authors & editorial teams is vox populi, but there is a need for evidence like this explo…
RT @PLOSBiology: Massive survey of >5k journals explores relationship between hyper-prolific authors & journal editorial teams, finding a s…
RT @PLOSBiology: Massive survey of >5k journals explores relationship between hyper-prolific authors & journal editorial teams, finding a s…
RT @PLOSBiology: Massive survey of >5k journals explores relationship between hyper-prolific authors & journal editorial teams, finding a s…
RT @PLOSBiology: Massive survey of >5k journals explores relationship between hyper-prolific authors & journal editorial teams, finding a s…
RT @NaudetFlorian: Just out in @PLOSBiology, our meta-research paper led by the 2 fantastic Alexandre Scanff and @Clara_Locher with the gre…
RT @NaudetFlorian: Just out in @PLOSBiology, our meta-research paper led by the 2 fantastic Alexandre Scanff and @Clara_Locher with the gre…
Am I the only one not surprised by this finding that some editorial board members get green light to #publish prolifically in journals they edit? A survey of biomedical journals to detect editorial bias and nepotistic behavior https://t.co/tjBCQTrBts
RT @PLOSBiology: Massive survey of >5k journals explores relationship between hyper-prolific authors & journal editorial teams, finding a s…
A survey of biomedical journals to detect editorial bias and nepotistic behavior https://t.co/VxUUO8769e
RT @JelteWicherts: “I’ll publish your paper if you publish mine” nepotism in the biomedical literature @dmoher @NaudetFlorian @IoanaA_…
RT @ThomasAgoritsas: Isn’t that interesting… 🧐 A survey of biomedical journals to detect editorial bias and nepotistic behavior https://t.c…
RT @JelteWicherts: “I’ll publish your paper if you publish mine” nepotism in the biomedical literature @dmoher @NaudetFlorian @IoanaA_…
RT @PLOSBiology: Massive survey of >5k journals explores relationship between hyper-prolific authors & journal editorial teams, finding a s…
RT @JelteWicherts: “I’ll publish your paper if you publish mine” nepotism in the biomedical literature @dmoher @NaudetFlorian @IoanaA_…
RT @PLOSBiology: Massive survey of >5k journals explores relationship between hyper-prolific authors & journal editorial teams, finding a s…
RT @RichardLehman1: "Our results reveal a subset of journals where a few authors, often members of the editorial board, were responsible fo…
Such endogamic relationship btw authors & editorial teams is vox populi, but there is a need for evidence like this explored in biomedical journals This type of analysis should be extended to other scientific disciplines #Academia #PeerReview
Important look inward for #scientific publishing and #Academia.
Welcome to human society! We hope you enjoy your stay.
RT @DRTomlinsonEP: ☣️ On: NARRATIVE CONTROL ‘Our results reveal a subset of journals where a few authors, often members of the editorial b…
☣️ On: NARRATIVE CONTROL ‘Our results reveal a subset of journals where a few authors, often members of the editorial board, were responsible for a disproportionate number of publications.’ #ScienceOrAdvertising #openscience #peerreview https://t.co/C1s
RT @PLOSBiology: Massive survey of >5k journals explores relationship between hyper-prolific authors & journal editorial teams, finding a s…
RT @ThomasAgoritsas: Isn’t that interesting… 🧐 A survey of biomedical journals to detect editorial bias and nepotistic behavior https://t.c…
"Our results reveal a subset of journals where a few authors, often members of the editorial board, were responsible for a disproportionate number of publications."
RT @PLOSBiology: Massive survey of >5k journals explores relationship between hyper-prolific authors & journal editorial teams, finding a s…
RT @gowrigopala: “Guidance for editors and publishers should be developed to delineate good practices and prevent obvious misconduct” Anoth…
Isn’t that interesting… 🧐 A survey of biomedical journals to detect editorial bias and nepotistic behavior https://t.co/44T64cvtUc