RT @LabHaas: @SiegenthalerLab Formal training pre-internet was lacking, and so very low-N. I shudder, and occasionally ruminate, over this…
RT @LabHaas: @SiegenthalerLab Formal training pre-internet was lacking, and so very low-N. I shudder, and occasionally ruminate, over this…
RT @LabHaas: @SiegenthalerLab Formal training pre-internet was lacking, and so very low-N. I shudder, and occasionally ruminate, over this…
RT @LabHaas: @SiegenthalerLab Formal training pre-internet was lacking, and so very low-N. I shudder, and occasionally ruminate, over this…
RT @LabHaas: @SiegenthalerLab Formal training pre-internet was lacking, and so very low-N. I shudder, and occasionally ruminate, over this…
RT @LabHaas: @SiegenthalerLab Formal training pre-internet was lacking, and so very low-N. I shudder, and occasionally ruminate, over this…
RT @LabHaas: @SiegenthalerLab Formal training pre-internet was lacking, and so very low-N. I shudder, and occasionally ruminate, over this…
RT @LabHaas: @SiegenthalerLab Formal training pre-internet was lacking, and so very low-N. I shudder, and occasionally ruminate, over this…
RT @LabHaas: @SiegenthalerLab Formal training pre-internet was lacking, and so very low-N. I shudder, and occasionally ruminate, over this…
RT @LabHaas: @SiegenthalerLab Formal training pre-internet was lacking, and so very low-N. I shudder, and occasionally ruminate, over this…
RT @LabHaas: @SiegenthalerLab Formal training pre-internet was lacking, and so very low-N. I shudder, and occasionally ruminate, over this…
@SiegenthalerLab Formal training pre-internet was lacking, and so very low-N. I shudder, and occasionally ruminate, over this. All the published referee reports (ELife, etc) are great for training in pattern matching. PLoS Biol has a "10 simple rules":
Ten Simple Rules for Reviewers https://t.co/eqGM6tTINp
@aofvet @epi_twit Note, I don't ask if the findings are important or significant. I ask if the data are collected, reported, and interpreted appropriately. Last, here's a good reference for getting started: https://t.co/1wFVXRcDSH
@sjblakemore There are nice tips from the @PLOS "10 simple rules" series: https://t.co/3jgDeFUp01
RT @Adam_Weiner535: A final note - this is my approach that I've gotten use to There are a lot of different approaches @PLOSONE has a nic…
A final note - this is my approach that I've gotten use to There are a lot of different approaches @PLOSONE has a nice one https://t.co/883td6u1Qw I'd suggest you find the system that works best for you - I'd love to hear others share theirs Happy rev
👍
RT @ScanUnit: Today's lab meeting included a crash course in "how to review and respond to reviews", with personal insights from @ClausLamm…
RT @ScanUnit: Today's lab meeting included a crash course in "how to review and respond to reviews", with personal insights from @ClausLamm…
RT @ScanUnit: Today's lab meeting included a crash course in "how to review and respond to reviews", with personal insights from @ClausLamm…
Today's lab meeting included a crash course in "how to review and respond to reviews", with personal insights from @ClausLamm!✍️ Here are the papers we discussed as a starting point: 📨Reviewing: https://t.co/KfnAKb1yaV 📨Responding to reviewers: https://t
I'm not happy with rule 10, though. Sometimes the real criticism is only voiced in the "comments for the editors only" section. This can be a very difficult situation.
RT @FuzzyLeapfrog: "Ten Simple Rules for Reviewers" https://t.co/az12AA2BVf
"Ten Simple Rules for Reviewers" https://t.co/az12AA2BVf
RT @mtanichthys: @WhySharksMatter This happens to be something with a 10 simple rules article so that's a good starting point: https://t.co…
RT @mtanichthys: @WhySharksMatter This happens to be something with a 10 simple rules article so that's a good starting point: https://t.co…
RT @mtanichthys: @WhySharksMatter This happens to be something with a 10 simple rules article so that's a good starting point: https://t.co…
@WhySharksMatter This happens to be something with a 10 simple rules article so that's a good starting point: https://t.co/X6go2zzLlY
@Teens_Tics_Tech @TheHandLab For a high level overview, try starting with the PLoS Ten Simple Rules for reviewers Rule 0: do unto others. As others here noted, structure typically: summary (1para), evaluation (1para), major (bullets), minor (bullets) ht
RT @jsross119: @sarahkmels @venkmurthy @bnallamo @SVRaoMD @DrNancySweitzer @ColinRCooke @CircImaging @CircRes @JaneFreedmanMD So many great…
RT @jsross119: @sarahkmels @venkmurthy @bnallamo @SVRaoMD @DrNancySweitzer @ColinRCooke @CircImaging @CircRes @JaneFreedmanMD So many great…
@sarahkmels @venkmurthy @bnallamo @SVRaoMD @DrNancySweitzer @ColinRCooke @CircImaging @CircRes @JaneFreedmanMD So many great suggestions. My "pro" tip: be concise, be constructive. Write the review as if a) you are giving feedback to yourself (use the tone
RT @AgBioData: Ten Simple Rules for Reviewers https://t.co/eq46iX8p4f
Ten Simple Rules for Reviewers https://t.co/eq46iX8p4f
Ten Simple Rules for Reviewers https://t.co/liPXYDhswB via @AlonKorngreen
Great thread on peer reviewing for journals. But Vineet, reading a paper twice and then crafting such a thorough and thoughtful review must take more than 1-2 hours, no?!?! Also, here’s a resource I share with our @NCSP_Yale Scholars: https://t.co/AyRDCLhW
@Edit0r_At_Large @TanentzapfLab In the same kind, there is also this ten simple rules article: https://t.co/CFk8TdPK2i
@fishandfreckles @hormiga @ASIHCopeia Here's a blog post by @EcoEvoEvoEco https://t.co/j6oY9X4XLd And here's one from the ten simple rules series: https://t.co/X6go2zzLlY
This should be circulated by all mentors. No one taught me to peer review. I developed a process on my own that looks like this. But why don't we share this wisdom more widely?
RT @daforerog: @back2brains Ten Simple Rules for Reviewers https://t.co/jfKM4T2gto
@back2brains Ten Simple Rules for Reviewers https://t.co/jfKM4T2gto
RT @AgBioData: Ten Simple Rules for Reviewers https://t.co/eq46iX8p4f
Ten Simple Rules for Reviewers https://t.co/eq46iX8p4f
RT @Suze_Freogirl: And this is a good guide if asked to do a review of a paper: https://t.co/eAeaVx5cNZ there are some really useful 10 sim…
RT @Suze_Freogirl: And this is a good guide if asked to do a review of a paper: https://t.co/eAeaVx5cNZ there are some really useful 10 sim…
RT @Suze_Freogirl: And this is a good guide if asked to do a review of a paper: https://t.co/eAeaVx5cNZ there are some really useful 10 sim…
RT @Suze_Freogirl: And this is a good guide if asked to do a review of a paper: https://t.co/eAeaVx5cNZ there are some really useful 10 sim…
RT @Suze_Freogirl: And this is a good guide if asked to do a review of a paper: https://t.co/eAeaVx5cNZ there are some really useful 10 sim…
And this is a good guide if asked to do a review of a paper: https://t.co/eAeaVx5cNZ there are some really useful 10 simple rules articles here - many about writing https://t.co/G7QwSpNXSI #wespeechies #slpeeps
@BowermanNMD Indeed, there are https://t.co/wyYZQf46LI - apparently there are ten simple rules for everything.
@punuckish was it this? https://t.co/B9tN6vnvYD
RULE #1: Learn to Say No - https://t.co/Y6C1ahS9M1
RT @PLOSCompBiol: Ten Simple Rules for Reviewers - Bourne et al. #10SimpleRulesTues https://t.co/4vJ52zS9o8 https://t.co/KV0KNCaqUA
RT @PLOSCompBiol: This #10SimpleRulesTues: Ten Simple Rules for Reviewers, Bourne et al. https://t.co/4vJ52zS9o8 https://t.co/zv9f0bFX4l
RT @PLOSCompBiol: This #10SimpleRulesTues: Ten Simple Rules for Reviewers, Bourne et al. https://t.co/4vJ52zS9o8 https://t.co/zv9f0bFX4l
RT @PLOSCompBiol: This #10SimpleRulesTues: Ten Simple Rules for Reviewers, Bourne et al. https://t.co/4vJ52zS9o8 https://t.co/zv9f0bFX4l
RT @PLOSCompBiol: This #10SimpleRulesTues: Ten Simple Rules for Reviewers, Bourne et al. https://t.co/4vJ52zS9o8 https://t.co/zv9f0bFX4l
RT @PLOSCompBiol: This #10SimpleRulesTues: Ten Simple Rules for Reviewers, Bourne et al. https://t.co/4vJ52zS9o8 https://t.co/zv9f0bFX4l
This #10SimpleRulesTues: Ten Simple Rules for Reviewers, Bourne et al. https://t.co/4vJ52zS9o8 https://t.co/zv9f0bFX4l
RT @PLOSCompBiol: Ten Simple Rules for Reviewers - Bourne et al. #10SimpleRulesTues https://t.co/4vJ52zS9o8 https://t.co/KV0KNCaqUA
RT @PLOSCompBiol: Ten Simple Rules for Reviewers - Bourne et al. #10SimpleRulesTues https://t.co/4vJ52zS9o8 https://t.co/KV0KNCaqUA
RT @PLOSCompBiol: Ten Simple Rules for Reviewers - Bourne et al. #10SimpleRulesTues https://t.co/4vJ52zS9o8 https://t.co/KV0KNCaqUA
RT @PLOSCompBiol: Ten Simple Rules for Reviewers - Bourne et al. #10SimpleRulesTues https://t.co/4vJ52zS9o8 https://t.co/KV0KNCaqUA
RT @PLOSCompBiol: Ten Simple Rules for Reviewers - Bourne et al. #10SimpleRulesTues https://t.co/4vJ52zS9o8 https://t.co/KV0KNCaqUA
#PLOSCompBio: Ten Simple Rules for Reviewers https://t.co/3Iv89RBS0S, Un día les tocará Dr @iNorman55 @kikemtzglz
Ten Simple Rules for Reviewers, especially the one on 'Learning to say No' !! #peerreviewing #scientificpapers https://t.co/GMKJ51bN0m
RT @PLOSCompBiol: Ten Simple Rules for Reviewers - Bourne et al. #10SimpleRulesTues https://t.co/4vJ52zS9o8 https://t.co/KV0KNCaqUA
RT @PLOSCompBiol: Ten Simple Rules for Reviewers - Bourne et al. #10SimpleRulesTues https://t.co/4vJ52zS9o8 https://t.co/KV0KNCaqUA
@gd_roger @ilmenichetti you are reviewers (unfortunately for me) https://t.co/QxFOR12cYx
RT @PLOSCompBiol: Ten Simple Rules for Reviewers - Bourne et al. #10SimpleRulesTues https://t.co/4vJ52zS9o8 https://t.co/KV0KNCaqUA
RT @PLOSCompBiol: Ten Simple Rules for Reviewers - Bourne et al. #10SimpleRulesTues https://t.co/4vJ52zS9o8 https://t.co/KV0KNCaqUA
RT @PLOSCompBiol: Ten Simple Rules for Reviewers - Bourne et al. #10SimpleRulesTues https://t.co/4vJ52zS9o8 https://t.co/KV0KNCaqUA
RT @PLOSCompBiol: Ten Simple Rules for Reviewers - Bourne et al. #10SimpleRulesTues https://t.co/4vJ52zS9o8 https://t.co/KV0KNCaqUA
Ten Simple Rules for Reviewers - Bourne et al. #10SimpleRulesTues https://t.co/4vJ52zS9o8 https://t.co/KV0KNCaqUA
@punuckish I find these helpful: https://t.co/eXIChEGAa9, https://t.co/V7nGpbVjvq & https://t.co/ZHqBN2bplP let me know what you think
Ten Simple Rules for Reviewers https://t.co/0BNd2WRkK7
Ten simple rules for reviewers http://t.co/7hqKqi7jNX
Ten simple rules for reviewers http://t.co/7hqKqi7jNX
Rule 3: Write Reviews You Would Be Satisfied w/ as an Author - Ten Simple Rules for Reviewers http://t.co/HOEyb5SVHn #PLOSCompBio
Ten Simple Rules for #Reviewers: http://t.co/VpUCWTyP8z via @PLOS #worksmarter #learntosayno #research #science
Ten Simple Rules for #Reviewers: http://t.co/VpUCWTyP8z via @PLOS #worksmarter #learntosayno #research #science
#PLOSCompBio: Ten Simple Rules for Reviewers http://t.co/b7yrIR1pOx
Great article: 10 Simple Rules for Reviewers http://t.co/Jula74LAWK ~
RT @ThibautServant: RT @ThibautServant: "10 rules for reviewers" ou comment analyser simplement un article scientifique | http://t.co/VUgrUjdx #freeaccess o ...
"10 rules for reviewers" ou comment analyser simplement un article scientifique | http://t.co/VUgrUjdx #freeaccess on @PLOS ! via @LeGERAR
10 règles simples pour critiquer un article... le reviewing selon @PLOS c'est intéressant et c'est free access !! http://t.co/zmg1iTKJ #fb
RT @FIRPlab: Ten Simple Rules for Reviewers http://t.co/izhYVKl7 :: via @PLoSCompBiol
Ten Simple Rules for Reviewers http://t.co/izhYVKl7 :: via @PLoSCompBiol