↓ Skip to main content

PLOS

Ten Simple Rules for Reviewers

Overview of attention for article published in PLoS Computational Biology, September 2006
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

blogs
6 blogs
twitter
90 X users
facebook
3 Facebook pages
googleplus
2 Google+ users
q&a
2 Q&A threads

Citations

dimensions_citation
35 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
778 Mendeley
citeulike
39 CiteULike
connotea
6 Connotea
Title
Ten Simple Rules for Reviewers
Published in
PLoS Computational Biology, September 2006
DOI 10.1371/journal.pcbi.0020110
Pubmed ID
Authors

Philip E Bourne, Alon Korngreen

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 90 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 778 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 32 4%
Brazil 16 2%
Germany 15 2%
United Kingdom 15 2%
France 9 1%
India 5 <1%
Australia 4 <1%
Japan 4 <1%
Portugal 4 <1%
Other 52 7%
Unknown 622 80%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 188 24%
Student > Ph. D. Student 167 21%
Student > Master 77 10%
Professor > Associate Professor 61 8%
Professor 55 7%
Other 157 20%
Unknown 73 9%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 296 38%
Medicine and Dentistry 55 7%
Environmental Science 46 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 44 6%
Psychology 34 4%
Other 202 26%
Unknown 101 13%