↓ Skip to main content

PLOS

The Need for Randomization in Animal Trials: An Overview of Systematic Reviews

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, June 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

blogs
4 blogs
policy
1 policy source
twitter
78 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
207 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
209 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
The Need for Randomization in Animal Trials: An Overview of Systematic Reviews
Published in
PLOS ONE, June 2014
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0098856
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jennifer A Hirst, Jeremy Howick, Jeffrey K Aronson, Nia Roberts, Rafael Perera, Constantinos Koshiaris, Carl Heneghan

Abstract

Randomization, allocation concealment, and blind outcome assessment have been shown to reduce bias in human studies. Authors from the Collaborative Approach to Meta Analysis and Review of Animal Data from Experimental Studies (CAMARADES) collaboration recently found that these features protect against bias in animal stroke studies. We extended the scope the work from CAMARADES to include investigations of treatments for any condition.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 78 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 209 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 2 <1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
United States 2 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
Unknown 201 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 34 16%
Researcher 31 15%
Student > Bachelor 26 12%
Student > Master 24 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 12 6%
Other 37 18%
Unknown 45 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 48 23%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 30 14%
Neuroscience 15 7%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 15 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 10 5%
Other 38 18%
Unknown 53 25%