ā†“ Skip to main content

PLOS

Assessing the Impact of Water Filters and Improved Cook Stoves on Drinking Water Quality and Household Air Pollution: A Randomised Controlled Trial in Rwanda

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, March 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
3 policy sources
twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
99 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
237 Mendeley
Title
Assessing the Impact of Water Filters and Improved Cook Stoves on Drinking Water Quality and Household Air Pollution: A Randomised Controlled Trial in Rwanda
Published in
PLOS ONE, March 2014
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0091011
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ghislaine Rosa, Fiona Majorin, Sophie Boisson, Christina Barstow, Michael Johnson, Miles Kirby, Fidele Ngabo, Evan Thomas, Thomas Clasen

Abstract

Diarrhoea and respiratory infections remain the biggest killers of children under 5 years in developing countries. We conducted a 5-month household randomised controlled trial among 566 households in rural Rwanda to assess uptake, compliance and impact on environmental exposures of a combined intervention delivering high-performance water filters and improved stoves for free. Compliance was measured monthly by self-report and spot-check observations. Semi-continuous 24-h PM2.5 monitoring of the cooking area was conducted in a random subsample of 121 households to assess household air pollution, while samples of drinking water from all households were collected monthly to assess the levels of thermotolerant coliforms. Adoption was generally high, with most householders reporting the filters as their primary source of drinking water and the intervention stoves as their primary cooking stove. However, some householders continued to drink untreated water and most continued to cook on traditional stoves. The intervention was associated with a 97.5% reduction in mean faecal indicator bacteria (Williams means 0.5 vs. 20.2 TTC/100 mL, p<0.001) and a median reduction of 48% of 24-h PM2.5 concentrations in the cooking area (pā€Š=ā€Š0.005). Further studies to increase compliance should be undertaken to better inform large-scale interventions.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 237 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Netherlands 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Russia 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 233 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 45 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 34 14%
Student > Bachelor 30 13%
Researcher 27 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 14 6%
Other 36 15%
Unknown 51 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 43 18%
Medicine and Dentistry 26 11%
Engineering 24 10%
Social Sciences 20 8%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 12 5%
Other 46 19%
Unknown 66 28%