↓ Skip to main content

PLOS

Second Language as an Exemptor from Sociocultural Norms. Emotion-Related Language Choice Revisited

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, December 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

blogs
2 blogs
twitter
101 X users
facebook
20 Facebook pages
wikipedia
4 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
48 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
97 Mendeley
Title
Second Language as an Exemptor from Sociocultural Norms. Emotion-Related Language Choice Revisited
Published in
PLOS ONE, December 2013
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0081225
Pubmed ID
Authors

Marta Gawinkowska, Michał B. Paradowski, Michał Bilewicz

Abstract

Bilinguals often switch languages depending on what they are saying. According to the Emotion-Related Language Choice theory, they find their second language an easier medium of conveying content which evokes strong emotions. The first language carries too much emotional power, which can be threatening for the speaker. In a covert experiment, bilingual Polish students translated texts brimming with expletives from Polish into English and vice versa. In the Polish translations, the swear word equivalents used were weaker than in the source text; in the English translations, they were stronger than in the original. These results corroborate the ERLC theory. However, the effect was only observed for ethnophaulisms, i.e. expletives directed at social groups. It turns out that the main factor triggering the language choice in bilinguals is not necessarily the different emotional power of both languages, but social and cultural norms.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 101 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 97 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Netherlands 1 1%
Unknown 96 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 16%
Student > Master 13 13%
Student > Bachelor 11 11%
Researcher 9 9%
Other 7 7%
Other 21 22%
Unknown 20 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 25 26%
Linguistics 24 25%
Social Sciences 9 9%
Engineering 3 3%
Arts and Humanities 3 3%
Other 11 11%
Unknown 22 23%