Title |
Sago-Type Palms Were an Important Plant Food Prior to Rice in Southern Subtropical China
|
---|---|
Published in |
PLOS ONE, May 2013
|
DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0063148 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Xiaoyan Yang, Huw J. Barton, Zhiwei Wan, Quan Li, Zhikun Ma, Mingqi Li, Dan Zhang, Jun Wei |
Abstract |
Poor preservation of plant macroremains in the acid soils of southern subtropical China has hampered understanding of prehistoric diets in the region and of the spread of domesticated rice southwards from the Yangtze River region. According to records in ancient books and archaeological discoveries from historical sites, it is presumed that roots and tubers were the staple plant foods in this region before rice agriculture was widely practiced. But no direct evidences provided to test the hypothesis. Here we present evidence from starch and phytolith analyses of samples obtained during systematic excavations at the site of Xincun on the southern coast of China, demonstrating that during 3,350-2,470 aBC humans exploited sago palms, bananas, freshwater roots and tubers, fern roots, acorns, Job's-tears as well as wild rice. A dominance of starches and phytoliths from palms suggest that the sago-type palms were an important plant food prior to the rice in south subtropical China. We also believe that because of their reliance on a wide range of starch-rich plant foods, the transition towards labour intensive rice agriculture was a slow process. |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 4 | 20% |
United Kingdom | 2 | 10% |
Italy | 1 | 5% |
New Zealand | 1 | 5% |
Unknown | 12 | 60% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 15 | 75% |
Scientists | 3 | 15% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 5% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 1 | 1% |
Spain | 1 | 1% |
Germany | 1 | 1% |
Unknown | 84 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 17 | 20% |
Student > Master | 17 | 20% |
Student > Bachelor | 10 | 11% |
Researcher | 9 | 10% |
Professor | 7 | 8% |
Other | 11 | 13% |
Unknown | 16 | 18% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 19 | 22% |
Arts and Humanities | 18 | 21% |
Social Sciences | 13 | 15% |
Environmental Science | 6 | 7% |
Chemistry | 3 | 3% |
Other | 8 | 9% |
Unknown | 20 | 23% |