↓ Skip to main content

PLOS

Basis for Cumulative Cultural Evolution in Chimpanzees: Social Learning of a More Efficient Tool-Use Technique

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, January 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

news
3 news outlets
policy
1 policy source
twitter
34 X users
facebook
6 Facebook pages
googleplus
3 Google+ users
reddit
2 Redditors

Readers on

mendeley
206 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Basis for Cumulative Cultural Evolution in Chimpanzees: Social Learning of a More Efficient Tool-Use Technique
Published in
PLOS ONE, January 2013
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0055768
Pubmed ID
Authors

Shinya Yamamoto, Tatyana Humle, Masayuki Tanaka

Abstract

The evidence for culture in non-human animals has been growing incrementally over the past two decades. However, the ability for cumulative cultural evolution, with successive generations building on earlier achievements, in non-human animals remains debated. Faithful social learning of incremental improvements in technique is considered to be a defining feature of human culture, differentiating human from non-human cultures. This study presents the first experimental evidence for chimpanzees' social transmission of a more efficient tool-use technique invented by a conspecific group member.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 34 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 206 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 1%
Brazil 2 <1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
Unknown 195 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 45 22%
Student > Ph. D. Student 36 17%
Researcher 28 14%
Student > Master 25 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 14 7%
Other 28 14%
Unknown 30 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 65 32%
Psychology 47 23%
Social Sciences 20 10%
Environmental Science 5 2%
Linguistics 4 2%
Other 23 11%
Unknown 42 20%