↓ Skip to main content

PLOS

Adaptive Pacing, Cognitive Behaviour Therapy, Graded Exercise, and Specialist Medical Care for Chronic Fatigue Syndrome: A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, August 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

news
3 news outlets
blogs
12 blogs
twitter
190 X users
peer_reviews
1 peer review site
facebook
13 Facebook pages
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages
googleplus
3 Google+ users

Citations

dimensions_citation
64 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
155 Mendeley
Title
Adaptive Pacing, Cognitive Behaviour Therapy, Graded Exercise, and Specialist Medical Care for Chronic Fatigue Syndrome: A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis
Published in
PLOS ONE, August 2012
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0040808
Pubmed ID
Authors

Paul McCrone, Michael Sharpe, Trudie Chalder, Martin Knapp, Anthony L. Johnson, Kimberley A. Goldsmith, Peter D. White

Abstract

The PACE trial compared the effectiveness of adding adaptive pacing therapy (APT), cognitive behaviour therapy (CBT), or graded exercise therapy (GET), to specialist medical care (SMC) for patients with chronic fatigue syndrome. This paper reports the relative cost-effectiveness of these treatments in terms of quality adjusted life years (QALYs) and improvements in fatigue and physical function.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 190 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 155 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Greece 1 <1%
Unknown 151 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 26 17%
Student > Bachelor 20 13%
Researcher 19 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 6%
Other 36 23%
Unknown 32 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 43 28%
Nursing and Health Professions 16 10%
Psychology 16 10%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 6 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 4%
Other 30 19%
Unknown 38 25%