Unregistered Submission
An Expression of Concern was published on 2 May 2017, see http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0177037See also https://jcoynester...
An Expression of Concern was published on 2 May 2017, see http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0177037See also https://jcoynester...
http://www.virology.ws/2016/05/23/an-open-letter-to-plos-one/"Given that Dr. McCrone, the lead author, directly contradicted in his comments what the paper itself claimed about sensitivity analyses…
James Coyne has until now not received the raw research data of this paper. A new blog post from 9 May 2016 at https://jcoynester.wordpress.com/2016/05/09/half-year-passes-without-release-of-plos-one-p…
James Coyne received on 7 April 2016 an e-mail from the Managing Editor of PLOS One about his request to get full and unlimited access to the full set of raw research data of this paper...
Update from http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/comment?id=info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fannotation%2F8c1798c4-e4bb-4e1e-b949-49155bfb7932"Update on follow up; Posted by PLoS_ONE_Group on 07 Mar 2016…
There are four recent blogs of Andrew Gelman about the refusal of the authors of this paper to share the raw research data to other scientists (and about a bunch of other problems related to this…
I am Klaas van Dijk and I got an e-mail from PLOS about the ongoing issues of professor Coyne (and others) to get unlimited access to the raw research data of this paper...
See also https://jcoynester.wordpress.com/2015/12/22/recognizing-when-protecting-patient-privacy-is-mere-excuse-for-not-sharing-data/ (a new blogpost of professor Coyne) and http://www...
An editoral note by PLOS ONE has been published. This editorial note reads like an Expression of Concern. See http://retractionwatch.com/2015/12/16/plos-one-issues-editors-note-over-disputed-chronic-f…
See https://jcoynester.wordpress.com/2015/12/12/formal-request-to-plos-one-to-issue-an-expression-of-concern-for-pace-cost-effectiveness-study/ for a formal request to issue an Expression of Concern...
This is simply astonishing! While I'm somewhat skeptical of a good number of pubpeer cases, the reply you have provided leaves no doubt that if King's College will persist with such attitude this…
Alem Matthees | Dec 11 2015 22:38 ESTWith reference to James C Coyne's comment about KCL rejecting his request for trial data as 'vexatious':There are crucial facts and context missing from QMUL's (and…
What a joke. If your data can't stand scrutiny, don't publish them.I hope Coyne can and does appeal this anti-scientific decision by the university...
See https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/23608059/PACE%20F325-15%20-%20Prof.%20James%20Coyne%20-%20Response-2.pdf for the response of King's College (London, UK) on the request of professor Coyne to…
James C Coyne | Dec 11 2015 13:12 ESTThe university considers that there is a lack of value or serious purpose to your request. The university also considers that there is improper motive behind the…