↓ Skip to main content

PLOS

Human Embryonic Stem Cells Differentiated to Lung Lineage-Specific Cells Ameliorate Pulmonary Fibrosis in a Xenograft Transplant Mouse Model

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, March 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
f1000
1 research highlight platform

Readers on

mendeley
86 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Human Embryonic Stem Cells Differentiated to Lung Lineage-Specific Cells Ameliorate Pulmonary Fibrosis in a Xenograft Transplant Mouse Model
Published in
PLOS ONE, March 2012
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0033165
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ena Ray Banerjee, Michael A. Laflamme, Thalia Papayannopoulou, Michael Kahn, Charles E. Murry, William R. Henderson

Abstract

Our aim was to differentiate human (h) embryonic stem (ES) cells into lung epithelial lineage-specific cells [i.e., alveolar epithelial type I (AEI) and type II (AEII) cells and Clara cells] as the first step in the development of cell-based strategies to repair lung injury in the bleomycin mouse model of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF). A heterogeneous population of non-ciliated lung lineage-specific cells was derived by a novel method of embryoid body (EB) differentiation. This differentiated human cell population was used to modulate the profibrotic phenotype in transplanted animals.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 86 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Japan 1 1%
Unknown 85 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 17 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 15%
Student > Bachelor 10 12%
Student > Postgraduate 6 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 6%
Other 10 12%
Unknown 25 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 23 27%
Medicine and Dentistry 15 17%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 11 13%
Engineering 4 5%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 2%
Other 5 6%
Unknown 26 30%