↓ Skip to main content

PLOS

Perceptions of Conflict of Interest Disclosures among Peer Reviewers

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, November 2011
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
15 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Readers on

mendeley
36 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Perceptions of Conflict of Interest Disclosures among Peer Reviewers
Published in
PLOS ONE, November 2011
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0026900
Pubmed ID
Authors

Suzanne Lippert, Michael L. Callaham, Bernard Lo

Abstract

Disclosure of financial conflicts of interest (COI) is intended to help reviewers assess the impact of potential bias on the validity of research results; however, there have been no empiric assessments of how reviewers understand and use disclosures in article evaluation. We investigate reviewers' perceptions of potential bias introduced by particular author disclosures, and whether reviewer characteristics are associated with a greater likelihood of perceiving bias.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 15 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 36 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Chile 1 3%
France 1 3%
Japan 1 3%
United States 1 3%
Croatia 1 3%
Unknown 31 86%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 10 28%
Student > Master 6 17%
Other 3 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 8%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 8%
Other 7 19%
Unknown 4 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 14 39%
Social Sciences 6 17%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 3%
Other 5 14%
Unknown 6 17%