Title |
Perceptions of Conflict of Interest Disclosures among Peer Reviewers
|
---|---|
Published in |
PLOS ONE, November 2011
|
DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0026900 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Suzanne Lippert, Michael L. Callaham, Bernard Lo |
Abstract |
Disclosure of financial conflicts of interest (COI) is intended to help reviewers assess the impact of potential bias on the validity of research results; however, there have been no empiric assessments of how reviewers understand and use disclosures in article evaluation. We investigate reviewers' perceptions of potential bias introduced by particular author disclosures, and whether reviewer characteristics are associated with a greater likelihood of perceiving bias. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 15 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 15 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 13 | 87% |
Scientists | 2 | 13% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 36 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Chile | 1 | 3% |
France | 1 | 3% |
Japan | 1 | 3% |
United States | 1 | 3% |
Croatia | 1 | 3% |
Unknown | 31 | 86% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 10 | 28% |
Student > Master | 6 | 17% |
Other | 3 | 8% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 8% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 3 | 8% |
Other | 7 | 19% |
Unknown | 4 | 11% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 14 | 39% |
Social Sciences | 6 | 17% |
Business, Management and Accounting | 2 | 6% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 6% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 3% |
Other | 5 | 14% |
Unknown | 6 | 17% |