RT @pholme: it would feel very meta to be a reviewer on this: Conflict of Interest Disclosures among Reviewers http://t.co/tEJ846hO
it would feel very meta to be a reviewer on this: Conflict of Interest Disclosures among Reviewers http://t.co/tEJ846hO
#PLoS: Perceptions of Conflict of Interest Disclosures among Peer Reviewers http://t.co/FRFGBVko
RT @Keith_Laws: RT @PLoSONE: Authors declaring financial interests doesn't hurt perception of their work http://t.co/eGfloz7c True also for NICE committees
#PLoS: Perceptions of Conflict of Interest Disclosures among Peer Reviewers http://t.co/Aqa7PV0Z
#PLoS: schizophrenia, the Rubber Hand Illusion & Spontaneous Out-of-Body Experience... http://t.co/7qedwrEe
RT @PLoSONE: Authors declaring financial interests doesn't hurt perception of their work http://t.co/eGfloz7c True also for NICE committees
RT @PLoSONE: Authors declaring financial interests related to their research doesn't hurt perception of their work http://t.co/3BNAlKa8
New @PLoSONE shows authors declaring research financial interests doesn't hurt perception of work http://t.co/CiTJr0sW @trished @cebmblog
RT @PLoSONE: Authors declaring financial interests related to their research doesn't hurt perception of their work http://t.co/3BNAlKa8
Please disclose! @PLoSONE: Authors declaring financial interests doesn't hurt perception of their work http://t.co/OF8e6EeO @IntegCientific
RT @PLoSONE: Authors declaring financial interests related to their research doesn't hurt perception of their work http://t.co/3BNAlKa8
#PLoS: Perceptions of Conflict of Interest Disclosures among Peer Reviewers http://t.co/arW6mlXo
Awesome; this is like a inception-style study of scientists with a pretty optimistic conclusion. Me likely http://t.co/Lj7gJwgr
Authors declaring financial interests related to their research doesn't hurt perception of their work http://t.co/3BNAlKa8