↓ Skip to main content

PLOS

Testing Protein Leverage in Lean Humans: A Randomised Controlled Experimental Study

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, October 2011
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

news
13 news outlets
blogs
2 blogs
twitter
184 X users
facebook
5 Facebook pages
reddit
1 Redditor
video
8 YouTube creators

Readers on

mendeley
263 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Testing Protein Leverage in Lean Humans: A Randomised Controlled Experimental Study
Published in
PLOS ONE, October 2011
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0025929
Pubmed ID
Authors

Alison K. Gosby, Arthur D. Conigrave, Namson S. Lau, Miguel A. Iglesias, Rosemary M. Hall, Susan A. Jebb, Jennie Brand-Miller, Ian D. Caterson, David Raubenheimer, Stephen J. Simpson

Abstract

A significant contributor to the rising rates of human obesity is an increase in energy intake. The 'protein leverage hypothesis' proposes that a dominant appetite for protein in conjunction with a decline in the ratio of protein to fat and carbohydrate in the diet drives excess energy intake and could therefore promote the development of obesity. Our aim was to test the 'protein leverage hypothesis' in lean humans by disguising the macronutrient composition of foods offered to subjects under ad libitum feeding conditions. Energy intakes and hunger ratings were measured for 22 lean subjects studied over three 4-day periods of in-house dietary manipulation. Subjects were restricted to fixed menus in random order comprising 28 foods designed to be similar in palatability, availability, variety and sensory quality and providing 10%, 15% or 25% energy as protein. Nutrient and energy intake was calculated as the product of the amount of each food eaten and its composition. Lowering the percent protein of the diet from 15% to 10% resulted in higher (+12±4.5%, p = 0.02) total energy intake, predominantly from savoury-flavoured foods available between meals. This increased energy intake was not sufficient to maintain protein intake constant, indicating that protein leverage is incomplete. Urinary urea on the 10% and 15% protein diets did not differ statistically, nor did they differ from habitual values prior to the study. In contrast, increasing protein from 15% to 25% did not alter energy intake. On the fourth day of the trial, however, there was a greater increase in the hunger score between 1-2 h after the 10% protein breakfast versus the 25% protein breakfast (1.6±0.4 vs 25%: 0.5±0.3, p = 0.005). In our study population a change in the nutritional environment that dilutes dietary protein with carbohydrate and fat promotes overconsumption, enhancing the risk for potential weight gain.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 184 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 263 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 3 1%
Australia 3 1%
Portugal 2 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 252 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 44 17%
Researcher 35 13%
Student > Master 35 13%
Student > Bachelor 35 13%
Other 18 7%
Other 52 20%
Unknown 44 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 55 21%
Medicine and Dentistry 40 15%
Nursing and Health Professions 34 13%
Psychology 17 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 14 5%
Other 44 17%
Unknown 59 22%