↓ Skip to main content

PLOS

Docosahexaenoic Acid for Reading, Cognition and Behavior in Children Aged 7–9 Years: A Randomized, Controlled Trial (The DOLAB Study)

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, September 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

news
16 news outlets
blogs
3 blogs
twitter
89 X users
facebook
17 Facebook pages
wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages
googleplus
5 Google+ users
reddit
1 Redditor

Citations

dimensions_citation
138 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
358 Mendeley
Title
Docosahexaenoic Acid for Reading, Cognition and Behavior in Children Aged 7–9 Years: A Randomized, Controlled Trial (The DOLAB Study)
Published in
PLOS ONE, September 2012
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0043909
Pubmed ID
Authors

Alexandra J. Richardson, Jennifer R. Burton, Richard P. Sewell, Thees F. Spreckelsen, Paul Montgomery

Abstract

Omega-3 fatty acids are dietary essentials, and the current low intakes in most modern developed countries are believed to contribute to a wide variety of physical and mental health problems. Evidence from clinical trials indicates that dietary supplementation with long-chain omega-3 may improve child behavior and learning, although most previous trials have involved children with neurodevelopmental disorders such as attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) or developmental coordination disorder (DCD). Here we investigated whether such benefits might extend to the general child population.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 89 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 358 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 <1%
Spain 2 <1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Malaysia 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 348 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 60 17%
Student > Bachelor 58 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 42 12%
Researcher 40 11%
Student > Postgraduate 22 6%
Other 51 14%
Unknown 85 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 69 19%
Psychology 50 14%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 32 9%
Social Sciences 27 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 21 6%
Other 65 18%
Unknown 94 26%