↓ Skip to main content

PLOS

Socioeconomic Status (SES) and Children's Intelligence (IQ): In a UK-Representative Sample SES Moderates the Environmental, Not Genetic, Effect on IQ

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, February 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

blogs
2 blogs
twitter
54 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages
reddit
1 Redditor

Citations

dimensions_citation
209 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
373 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
Title
Socioeconomic Status (SES) and Children's Intelligence (IQ): In a UK-Representative Sample SES Moderates the Environmental, Not Genetic, Effect on IQ
Published in
PLOS ONE, February 2012
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0030320
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ken B. Hanscombe, Maciej Trzaskowski, Claire M. A. Haworth, Oliver S. P. Davis, Philip S. Dale, Robert Plomin

Abstract

The environment can moderate the effect of genes - a phenomenon called gene-environment (GxE) interaction. Several studies have found that socioeconomic status (SES) modifies the heritability of children's intelligence. Among low-SES families, genetic factors have been reported to explain less of the variance in intelligence; the reverse is found for high-SES families. The evidence however is inconsistent. Other studies have reported an effect in the opposite direction (higher heritability in lower SES), or no moderation of the genetic effect on intelligence.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 54 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 373 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 6 2%
United States 4 1%
Netherlands 2 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
China 1 <1%
Ireland 1 <1%
Unknown 357 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 61 16%
Student > Bachelor 56 15%
Researcher 52 14%
Student > Master 46 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 27 7%
Other 61 16%
Unknown 70 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 128 34%
Medicine and Dentistry 35 9%
Social Sciences 28 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 19 5%
Neuroscience 18 5%
Other 54 14%
Unknown 91 24%