@ReinisLazda @rtarasovs @ArvisKolmanis Dzimumu daudzfaktoru psiholoģisko atšķirību analīze, kura konstatē ~10% pārklāšanos starp dzimumiem - atkal vai tas nenorāda uz faktisku binaritāti? https://t.co/b8gU21fjiX
@CuzImSara_ Die Geschlechterunterschiede in "Sensitivity" sind enorm (d = −2.29). https://t.co/1vhEqJl3IF Der Grund ist vermutlich (pränatales) Testosteron.
@lawen4cer @vorpolitisch Und natürlich sind die Unterschiede im Schnitt teilweise auch sehr sehr groß, zB in der Persönlichkeit "We found a global effect size D = 2.71, corresponding to an overlap of only 10% between the male and female distributions" http
@Foxy__Lea @lobsterarco @GPa166 @berkgers A propos des stéréotypes : selon cet articles, les différents h/f sont encore plus importantes que ce qu'on croyait jusqu'ici : https://t.co/Knh1xBEQrR
@em_r70 @sku_dra Atklāj sev ka starp vīriešiem un sievietēm ir lielas statistiskas personības atšķirības un padomā kā tas ietekmē nodarbošanās izvēli. https://t.co/b8gU21fjiX
@Lin_Willowcreek @DrJessicaRitter Ähm... Frauen sind körperlich schwächer. Und im Schnitt auch "weicher" (Sensitivity d = −2.29). https://t.co/OvetVMcBKg. Vielleicht ist es einfach eine Abbildung der Realität?
@b_placeless @lawen4cer Nein, sind sie nicht. zB für Persönlichkeit: The multivariate effect for latent variables was D = 2.71 (with 95% CI from 2.66 to 2.76); this is an extremely large effect, corresponding to an overlap of only 10% between the male and
@Eli_B_Again @wanyeburkett If you add up all the small differences, the overall difference is revealed to be much larger https://t.co/5cWerdVbeO
@Pinkydust95 @heretyczka_ @impatiencee Ogromnie się różnią pod względem emocjonalnym. Na podstawie prostego anonimowego testu osobowości możesz rozróżnić kobietę od mężczyzny z ponad 90% skutecznością. Literatura https://t.co/uco3Tc0w16
@RoidNatty @Shevek1981 D = 2.71 allein für unterschiede in der Persönlichkeit ist schon sehr groß https://t.co/1vhEqJl3IF und die Trefferrate zB nur nach Facebooklikes ist schon sehr hoch: https://t.co/ypZRw0rUfe
Omitting 90% of girls who don't care for architecture isn't beautiful. Only 10% of women express masculine interests, and that tracks well with only 15% of women identifying as feminists who claim to represent all women. https://t.co/We65PC0THX
@KinoYaou https://t.co/MNz4UVyuew Mieux expliqué : https://t.co/nCMOcNQK4v https://t.co/AmSUQzHetQ https://t.co/IBL3ATLeNY https://t.co/mxeN6CWMMs Pour nuancé sur l'ampleur de ces diff : https://t.co/D5UtqGDbda Pour nuancé sur les jouets : https://t.co/R
RT @NeuroSGS: Assessing personality traits in a univariate analysis reveals considerable overlapping distributions between the sexes. Howev…
RT @NeuroSGS: Assessing personality traits in a univariate analysis reveals considerable overlapping distributions between the sexes. Howev…
RT @NeuroSGS: Assessing personality traits in a univariate analysis reveals considerable overlapping distributions between the sexes. Howev…
RT @NeuroSGS: Assessing personality traits in a univariate analysis reveals considerable overlapping distributions between the sexes. Howev…
RT @NeuroSGS: Assessing personality traits in a univariate analysis reveals considerable overlapping distributions between the sexes. Howev…
RT @NeuroSGS: Assessing personality traits in a univariate analysis reveals considerable overlapping distributions between the sexes. Howev…
RT @NeuroSGS: Assessing personality traits in a univariate analysis reveals considerable overlapping distributions between the sexes. Howev…
Assessing personality traits in a univariate analysis reveals considerable overlapping distributions between the sexes. However, when implementing a multivariate analysis, men & women show an overlap of only 10%: https://t.co/ISqxVDwx3u https://t.co/
RT @HumbledFemales: Sensitivity, warmth, and apprehension was higher in females. Emotional stability, dominance, rule-consciousness, and v…
@Loving_Erich @Cyberphunk @_homoduplex Hier ist es für Persönlichkeitsunterschiede doch ganz gut ersichtlich: https://t.co/1vhEqJl3IF We found a global effect size D = 2.71, corresponding to an overlap of only 10% between the male and female distributions.
@gravityismygod @SjMmjs00 @DeiMacD @AlastairSuzanna @ejrosetta "so plz name one thing that makes a woman a woman that isn't just sterotype? What makes a woman a woman is not one thing. Its the combination of 100s of things that always go in the same direc
@rougecoquin @LimonovEdouard Envrai j'ai cumulé pas mal de docs sur les diff H/F sur pleins de secteurs https://t.co/IBL3ATLeNY De pas mal de sources différentes histoires de
Sensitivity, warmth, and apprehension was higher in females. Emotional stability, dominance, rule-consciousness, and vigilance was higher in males. https://t.co/eEU2UPGWos
@DiddyBoo1 @BenjaminABoyce @Naxela2 If the brain is not sexed, where do these massive female-male psychological differences come from? https://t.co/0KYDBi7K1s
@djdegaf https://t.co/oRpwa0xxnL for anyone interested
@EPoe187 @ImHardcory @BrentWRoberts Thoughts? "The idea that there are only minor differences between the personality profiles of males and females should be rejected as based on inadequate methodology." https://t.co/EYlynSblL8
@AntoVoidance https://t.co/EYlynSblL8 "The idea that there are only minor differences between the personality profiles of males and females should be rejected as based on inadequate methodology."
@emmakeo @Senshaii @NijiSan8 @zachielyzael @MarsAttack18 @BastieTancrede Ensuite si tu veux lire sur l'hypoagency des femmes (à ne pas confondre avec l'hypergamie) https://t.co/iv5v8fysgE
When you add up multiple Cohens d values, it’s called Mahalanobis D (a multivariate effect size). When you do this, the overlap in the distributions significantly reduces. https://t.co/ZAQJVGlffw
RT @Russwarne: @StruanCurtis @Hoju89 @whyvert Articles on sex differences in personality being larger in more egalitarian countries: https:…
@StruanCurtis @Hoju89 @whyvert Articles on sex differences in personality being larger in more egalitarian countries: https://t.co/7aq2YcuM1S https://t.co/eBwapCOorN Race has nothing to do with this topic.
@MyWillToPower @like_a_jule Ist ja hier nicht der Fall. https://t.co/OiNwRwvCMX
@clairlemon Why do I have to do your homework for you. 🤣 A 2012 study found the same result. https://t.co/gVKddx4r6q https://t.co/O4y1J1GA0D
@Etjittkeenwood @gerechtGericht Wäre ja nun nichts ungewöhnliches, sensitivity ist einer der größten Geschlechterunterschiede (d = −2.29, ab 0,8 spricht man von großen unterschieden) https://t.co/1vhEqJl3IF
The Distance Between Mars and Venus: Measuring Global Sex Differences in Personality https://t.co/YlYBpZ8djf
الأبحاث كثيرة وهذي بعضها https://t.co/kZSG9OCWbf https://t.co/JAgyd0S6rf https://t.co/iT762z14V6 https://t.co/JvZkRjr9T9
#genderdifferences are #innate & NOT acquired 'The idea that there are only minor differences between the personality profiles of males and females should be rejected as based on inadequate methodology.' https://t.co/C3EtnFBBjk https://t.co/qsZbNn61
@felis_rex @AStullkowski @Maurice_Conrad bei "persönlichkeit" etwa gibt es nur eine Überlappung von 10%, dass ist ein sehr sehr großer Unterschied. https://t.co/1vhEqJl3IF
@katja1st @pickinese @JanJosefLiefers und mit d=1,71 ist im Bereich "Sensitifiy" ein enorm großer Geschlechterunterschied vorhaben (Groß beginnt bei 0,8, die Überlappung bei einer Normalverteilung liegt bei nur 14%) https://t.co/1vhEqJl3IF
@psicologia_an Varones y mujeres tenemos personalidades distintas. The Distance Between Mars and Venus:Global Sex Differences in Personality https://t.co/tUAHksColV Actualización en Trastornos de Personalidad (Informes: [email protected]">@anahuac.mx">[email protected])
@anne_kueppers Und "sensitivity" ist in der Tat einer der größten Geschlechterunterschiede (d = −2.29) https://t.co/Fa0PJNJgHj https://t.co/9uZ8xBfci5
@annalikesstars @AnnCoulter Sure! I need to find the data on my phone (not near a comouter at the moment. Bu i can build you the argument. First we establish the difference in the personality of the sex's, and identify it. https://t.co/oB16jebePW
RT @KmtzEric: Sex differences in personality/cognition: Lynn (1996): https://t.co/XczAsF5ibd Lippa (2008): https://t.co/Qj23kWX7Ch Lippa…
Sex differences in personality/cognition: Lynn (1996): https://t.co/XczAsF5ibd Lippa (2008): https://t.co/Qj23kWX7Ch Lippa (2010): https://t.co/cPD1Q7neuk Weisberg (2011): https://t.co/zzRpvCHnCJ Del Giudice (2012): https://t.co/QdCXi43uHN 3/6
@phwampfler @Babelsberch @gedankenfraese "Sensitivity" ist der Persönlichkeitswert mit einem der größten Geschlechterunterschiede im Schnitt (d = −2.29). Das ist enorm https://t.co/OvetVMcBKg Das finde ich die Aussage berechtigt. Hast du Studien die zu and
@tofugoore Die Abweichungen vom Mittelwert sind teilweise auch riesig. Siehe etwa https://t.co/1vhEqJl3IF (D = 2.71) oder hier: "The size of global sex differences was D = 2.06 in the United States and D = 2.10 across English‐speaking countries." https://t
@DuellaCreVil @vaterwelten einer der größten Geschlechterunterschiede in der Persönlichkeit ist "sensitivity (d = −2.29) Insofern mögen sie weiter fortgeschritten sein, aber eben nur auf der "Frauenskala" https://t.co/OvetVMcBKg
RT @allesevolution: @TamaraWernli Im Bereich "Sensitivity" ist der Geschlechterunterschied im Schnitt in der Tat riesig (d = −2.29). https:…
RT @allesevolution: @TamaraWernli Im Bereich "Sensitivity" ist der Geschlechterunterschied im Schnitt in der Tat riesig (d = −2.29). https:…
RT @allesevolution: @TamaraWernli Im Bereich "Sensitivity" ist der Geschlechterunterschied im Schnitt in der Tat riesig (d = −2.29). https:…
@TamaraWernli Im Bereich "Sensitivity" ist der Geschlechterunterschied im Schnitt in der Tat riesig (d = −2.29). https://t.co/1vhEqJl3IF
La evidencia es demasiado grande para ignorarla. En cuanto a la cantidad de superposición que existe, otro estudio (https://t.co/DDi8og2hBH) encuentra que una vez miras los rasgos específicos de la personalidad en vez de los metarrasgos, sólo se obtiene un
@ulfsvenning Javisst! Ett välanvänt exempel som det forskats mycket på är mäns riskbenägenhet och kvinnors omhändertagande och empatiska förmåga. Det finns många andra också såklart, bara att googla på gender+differences. Här är även en intressant studie
@bolosss_ @ifuseekperrie @abraxas1997 @MissiaAguirre @noseastr0lo @alferdez 3 - “Diferencias en la personalidad de cada sexo” Uno viejo: https://t.co/yuPtpz18xh Uno nuevo: https://t.co/N60LpVPKvm
Some common sense things that children learn at a young age and become refined into age old cultural wisdom require a great deal of higher education to brainwash away. Sex differences being a "social construct" a perfect example.
RT @robkhenderson: "results were striking: the effect size for global sex differences in personality was D = 2.71, an extremely large effec…
RT @robkhenderson: "results were striking: the effect size for global sex differences in personality was D = 2.71, an extremely large effec…
RT @robkhenderson: "results were striking: the effect size for global sex differences in personality was D = 2.71, an extremely large effec…
RT @robkhenderson: "results were striking: the effect size for global sex differences in personality was D = 2.71, an extremely large effec…
"results were striking: the effect size for global sex differences in personality was D = 2.71, an extremely large effect by any psychological standard, corresponding to a 10% overlap between the male and female distributions" https://t.co/s8ETvkKnM4 http
@AgegnehuAsegid That is why in Sweden the most best gender equality exercised country have 20 to 1 ratio of men to women engineers and 1 to 6 men to women phycologists. Read this research article https://t.co/DP1ZOSa2bI
@TetraspaceAdmn @tailcalled we need to temporarily form a unified Steven Universe–Marco del Guidice Fan Club to write the analogue of https://t.co/toRv9Bzy7q except for gem types
Great article explaining how small differences in traits across groups (males and females, in this case) can add up to huge global differences. 1/ #psychology https://t.co/AYfxzIpIlp
I find it so weird that this ended up in PLoS ONE. Not to bash PLoS, but I think it's a really fantastic paper!
@AdrianMatangi @primalpoly @charlesmurray "Multigroup latent variable modeling was used to estimate sex differences on individual personality dimensions, which were then aggregated to yield a multivariate effect size (Mahalanobis D)." https://t.co/EtV3wGLi
@primalpoly @charlesmurray If they dont comment on "Mahalanobis D" in gender differences they didnt even read Del Giudice, Booth and Iriving when it was published on PLOS ONE in January 2012. The "new" diversity obsessed academia simply betrays the princip
@hibiscus_sun @GigaHasi @mgoetzke @sixtus Plattform ist, aber da Sie ja unbedingt wollen, hier: Del Giudice: https://t.co/kxWCHRaxYK Schmitt: https://t.co/QZwkmQILNX Lippa: https://t.co/Mq469vYet4 Lubinski: https://t.co/Gk8ZOyq7gG Judge: https://t.co/yQBy0
@SeveriLuoto @ivanpuopolo Joo, samoin älykkyydet ovat samat mutta hajonnat suuria [miehillä]. Toisissa persoonallisuuspiirteissä taas erot sukupuolten välillä ovat suuremmat kuin sukupuolten sisällä (linkki). Ei silti kannatta olettaa joka miehen/naisen ol
RT @tkaiser_science: New paper with @tw_booth and Marco Del Giudice: - replicating a previous study (https://t.co/lJEC2jszno), - demonstrat…
@WiringTheBrain Each sex difference in isolation is "mostly very small." However: https://t.co/yyn0m7FOxV
RT @NidaaSehar: Original research paper on sex differences in personality: https://t.co/bKW0RHJCGZ
Original research paper on sex differences in personality: https://t.co/bKW0RHJCGZ
@sklavenmoral777 @ESYudkowsky Agreeableness and humility in men has been associated with a negative predictor of sex partners. https://t.co/2sEZiDHqGU
@LoveB1rd_ @Dana_Corres Medición de las diferencias sexuales globales en la personalidad https://t.co/vRV9wR7vJq Diferencias de sexo en los rasgos de personalidad y las preferencias relacionadas con el género en 53 naciones: prueba de teorías evolutivas y
New paper with @tw_booth and Marco Del Giudice: - replicating a previous study (https://t.co/lJEC2jszno), - demonstrating the effects of parcel allocation variability on estimating difference scores from latent factor models. https://t.co/i84lau6B37
@ajaromano Have you noticed that she engages with none of the science? Instead she holds forth on categorical - absolute - essentialism, eugenics, and says science is a slow process. This has nothing to do with that memo's premises. Meanwhile: https://t.co
@SwipeWright @PsychRabble Here, use this. See the comments sections as well. https://t.co/yyn0m7FOxV Also check out the "brain mosaic" talk. https://t.co/4EelodnkgX
Y otros más. Estos no son estudios pequeños hechos con 20 o 100 personas, como los que usan los ideólogos (que ellos encima elijen a dedo para ser "equitativos"). https://t.co/4reMjffwpK https://t.co/xs1mdJRLH2 https://t.co/2XCfCxdWGZ
@davegershgorn So...did the bad faith decree of Damore's citations as "pseudoscience" seem like a winner at the time? Or were you trying to objectively earn the distrust of any non-sectarian who sees your name or QZ again? https://t.co/CnbNqo609T https://
@statsepi @Sydonahi @gleet_tweet Multivar sex diff D's >= 1.5ish. https://t.co/s4fZ7euK2h Some argued these are biased&they might be, but not likely by more than 5-10%, probably less. These are straight up diffs, not necessarily directly relev to g
@RealYeyoZa @EPoe187 "Their" strategy and approach here are simply to install the "gender similarities hypothesis" in neuroscience. It's an import from the science of personality. Therefore this debate (see the comments section with Hyde) and Del Giudice a
@NickWolfinger @Aids_BC But even Hyde's "small diffs" perspective has been called into question. When overall diffs are examined in a sorta multidimensional aggregate (too hard to explain in twitter), the total personality diff is huge. https://t.co/s4fZ7
@chrismardell @sergiodlaz https://t.co/ITsXm8BeaL There's a 10% overlap in the personalities of men and women. When you isolate and remove the biggest univariate factor (sensitivity), there's still only a 24% overlap.
@liketheweather7 @erskine_fiona @Lise_Eliot You can take a look at this: https://t.co/yyn0m7odGn. Compare to Lise's stance. Her rhetorics, as I have read them, go even beyond the "gender similarities hypothesis." Also check out https://t.co/4EelodEVFx
@_NASDAQEnema_ @Tuanerwhiting @notCursedE Here's something from the middle of my meanderings. We hyper focus on differences so that's where most of the data is but it's really a small part of our overall behavior/composition. https://t.co/qctSvOY3ir
@CathrynTownsend @SpeciesTypical @janschjetne @matt_zefferman Interestingly enough - and tellingly - you can see the very parallels between "brain mosaics"/"no sex differences in brains" and the gender similarity hypothesis by comparing this: https://t.co/
@RiittaHankonen Eikä edes tarvitse olla miesasiamies. Riittää kun uskoo tutkimusnäyttöön. Täällä universaaleista eroista: https://t.co/YN3YZpJBqo https://t.co/J3pQ30upwo Kohdunaikaisten hormonien yhteydestä ammatilliseen kiinnostukseen: https://t.co/i
@CarlAltDel @BijouDemi @EricYerger3 you say gender and sex is different. Which field has the expertise on gender then? Psychologists? Because renowned psychologists like Jordan Peterson totally disagree with the trans activist views. Also, this might be fo