. @JoeTCJ I don’t have the 3-5 one but: https://t.co/IHDmpt2oqo https://t.co/XAxle5Eaxr ( @PatSchloss ) https://t.co/COeJdfOeI2
@MicrobiomDigest and yet their error rates are still 5-fold higher than what we found earlier... http://t.co/NXQoQ7WzDz
What they did in his: http://t.co/TOMVnjbW3Y looks nothing like this http://t.co/9fXuAgyk0S
RT @PatSchloss: @micro_interactn #stamps14 (i'll get this right eventually) http://t.co/i97LPG7rkc and http://t.co/5poUzm9QK6
RT @PatSchloss: @micro_interactn #STAMPS2014 (i'll get this right eventually) http://t.co/i97LPG7rkc and http://t.co/5poUzm9QK6
@micro_interactn #STAMPS2014 (i'll get this right eventually) http://t.co/O9Uew5QjiY and http://t.co/c6Ole4aWxt
16S配列が既知の種から成る模擬群集を使用 Reducing the Effects of PCR Amplification and Sequencing Artifacts on 16S rRNA-Based Studies http://t.co/P8xmQNc1
#stamps20121 ps Reducing the Effects of PCR Amplification and Sequencing Artifacts on 16S rRNA-Based Studies http://t.co/JEcWC6BL
@yeipijotape maybe this one...http://t.co/WViB923A
Plos One. Reducing the Effects of PCR Amplification and Sequencing Artifacts on 16S rRNA-Based Studies. http://t.co/P17pYVi5
#PLoS: Reducing the Effects of PCR Amplification and Sequencing Artifacts on 16S rRNA-Based Studies http://t.co/zdf4idnI
3 people sent me links to the new Schloss paper in PLoS One today - I guess I'd better read it! http://t.co/0vkaoydu #pyrosequencing
@B10Nerd Reducing the Effects of PCR Amplification and Sequencing Artifacts on 16S rRNA-Based Studies http://t.co/7vgsTsvn @myen
RT @B10Nerd: "Reducing the Effects of PCR Amplification and Sequencing Artifacts on 16S rRNA-Based Studies" http://t.co/aFNmRLN2
RT @B10Nerd: "Reducing the Effects of PCR Amplification and Sequencing Artifacts on 16S rRNA-Based Studies" http://t.co/aFNmRLN2
Reducing the Effects of PCR Amplification and Sequencing Artifacts on 16S rRNA-Based Studies = #awesome #metagenomics - http://t.co/AJCseZR0
Reducing the Effects of PCR Amplification and Sequencing Artifacts on 16S rRNA-Based Studies http://t.co/oRlwaOnA