@drob I wrote a paper about the economics of this: https://t.co/rDSdxf8vIg. The Nash equilibrium is no one reviews.
RT @BodoWinter: @tipologo Some experimental evidence by @jtleek suggests open reviews may be more cooperative w/ better outcomes : https://…
@tipologo Some experimental evidence by @jtleek suggests open reviews may be more cooperative w/ better outcomes : https://t.co/XZgU5Bgcsh
#PLOSONE: Cooperation between Referees and Authors Increases Peer Review Accuracy https://t.co/oLOJ4ws0wI
RT @Science_Open: A study from 2011 in @PLOSONE shows that co-operation in the #peerreview process increases the accuracy of reviews https:…
RT @Science_Open: A study from 2011 in @PLOSONE shows that co-operation in the #peerreview process increases the accuracy of reviews https:…
A study from 2011 in @PLOSONE shows that co-operation in the #peerreview process increases the accuracy of reviews https://t.co/Ij2RkWqs8H
RT @nextgenseek: @BioMickWatson @emckiernan13 @UCLA this paper by @simplystats is good one. https://t.co/tAidJuHYjD
@BioMickWatson @emckiernan13 @UCLA this paper by @simplystats is good one. https://t.co/tAidJuHYjD
RT @jtleek: .@drob @hspter In this (contrived/simplified) model of peer review accuracy went from 39%->78% after peer review https://t.co/X…
.@drob @hspter In this (contrived/simplified) model of peer review accuracy went from 39%->78% after peer review https://t.co/Xdsq0FBm3h
re last tweet https://t.co/tEQDR1PkX0 "increasing cooperation in the peer review process can lead to a decreased risk of reviewing errors"
game theory and peer-review; interesting paper http://t.co/HZygcMpJNV
game theory and peer-review; interesting paper http://t.co/HZygcMpJNV
Check out this awesome paper by @jtleek on the "economics" of peer review. http://t.co/hcrGBOkBPy
More on open vs blind review: RT @rdpeng: Check out this awesome paper by @jtleek on the "economics" of peer review. http://t.co/cn5iWnmibx
More on open vs blind review: RT @rdpeng: Check out this awesome paper by @jtleek on the "economics" of peer review. http://t.co/cn5iWnmibx
Check out this awesome paper by @jtleek on the "economics" of peer review. http://t.co/hcrGBOkBPy
Check out this awesome paper by @jtleek on the "economics" of peer review. http://t.co/hcrGBOkBPy
More on open vs blind review: RT @rdpeng: Check out this awesome paper by @jtleek on the "economics" of peer review. http://t.co/cn5iWnmibx
Check out this awesome paper by @jtleek on the "economics" of peer review. http://t.co/hcrGBOkBPy
RT @rdpeng: Check out this awesome paper by @jtleek on the "economics" of peer review. http://t.co/FbGZ0AWu7i
Check out this awesome paper by @jtleek on the "economics" of peer review. http://t.co/hcrGBOkBPy
@BioMickWatson kind of related by @simplystats http://t.co/D8Vi7PUTMh Coop. between Referees and Authors Increases Peer Review Accuracy
@BioMickWatson @simplystats think the same paper mentioned on prev. tweet. http://t.co/D8Vi7PUTMh
@BioMickWatson @simplystats think the same paper mentioned on prev. tweet. http://t.co/D8Vi7PUTMh
@BioMickWatson Experiments in http://t.co/YNavMGRoRt
@BioMickWatson kind of related by @simplystats http://t.co/D8Vi7PUTMh Coop. between Referees and Authors Increases Peer Review Accuracy
@biorxivpreprint and there is study to show this is open peer review is accurate too :) http://t.co/D8Vi7PDQKh
#PLOSONE: Cooperation between Referees and Authors Increases Peer Review Accuracy http://t.co/hDu0rdWq4Z
#PLOSONE: Cooperation between Referees and Authors Increases Peer Review Accuracy http://t.co/hDu0rdWq4Z
#PLOSONE: Cooperation between Referees and Authors Increases Peer Review Accuracy http://t.co/hDu0rdWq4Z
Cooperation between Referees and Authors Increases Peer Review Accuracy | http://t.co/MrL5In0EfY
Cooperation between Referees and Authors Increases Peer Review Accuracy: http://t.co/ORmPC7sQkl in @PLOSONE via @mattjhodgkinson
Cooperation between Referees and Authors Increases Peer Review Accuracy: http://t.co/ORmPC7sQkl in @PLOSONE via @mattjhodgkinson
Cooperation between Referees and Authors Increases Peer Review Accuracy: http://t.co/ORmPC7sQkl in @PLOSONE via @mattjhodgkinson
Cooperation between Referees and Authors Increases Peer Review Accuracy: http://t.co/ORmPC7sQkl in @PLOSONE via @mattjhodgkinson
Cooperation between Referees and Authors Increases Peer Review Accuracy: http://t.co/ORmPC7sQkl in @PLOSONE via @mattjhodgkinson
Cooperation between Referees and Authors Increases Peer Review Accuracy: http://t.co/ORmPC7sQkl in @PLOSONE via @mattjhodgkinson
Cooperation between referees and authors increases peer review accuracy http://t.co/Fncq9dnDOG via @MarcusMunafo
Cooperation between Referees and Authors Increases Peer Review Accuracy: http://t.co/ORmPC7sQkl in @PLOSONE via @mattjhodgkinson
@timothycbates I've just been sent this by @mattjhodgkinson which looks very interesting (not read it yet): http://t.co/ORmPC7sQkl
Cooperation between Referees and Authors Increases Peer Review Accuracy: http://t.co/oEkmRHviij
Cooperation between Referees and Authors Increases Peer Review Accuracy: http://t.co/oEkmRHviij
Cooperation between Referees and Authors Increases Peer Review Accuracy: http://t.co/oEkmRHviij
'increasing cooperation in the peer review process can lead to a decreased risk of reviewing errors' http://t.co/x5hOiAlglR
@JohnFBruno as twitter doesn't lend itself to nuanced discussion. Glad you're heeding 1 of the 4 pillars & http://t.co/2XKKAcNHK1 @cjlortie
Does Cooperation between #Referees and #Authors Increase #PeerReview Accuracy? http://t.co/DPGGsHQorO @PLOSONE
RT @mattjhodgkinson: @simon_andrews @BorisAdryan @aylwyn_scally @PLOSONE "Increasing cooperation in peer review can lead to fewer errors" http://t.co/IhuCdZrSpm
@simon_andrews @BorisAdryan @aylwyn_scally @PLOSONE "Increasing cooperation in peer review can lead to fewer errors" http://t.co/IhuCdZrSpm
#PLOSONE: Cooperation between Referees and Authors Increases Peer Review Accuracy http://t.co/pEBhKouS
#PLOSONE: Cooperation between Referees and Authors Increases Peer Review Accuracy http://t.co/pEBhKouS
#PLOSONE: Cooperation between Referees and Authors Increases Peer Review Accuracy http://t.co/pEBhKouS
Un artículo interesante para autores, editores, árbitros (revisores) y sobre todo para crear conciencia en la... http://t.co/l7umTnEa
Cooperation between Referees and Authors Increases Peer Review Accuracy http://t.co/81hLaHv4
Cooperation between Referees and Authors Increases Peer Review Accuracy http://t.co/81hLaHv4
#PLOSONE: Cooperation between Referees and Authors Increases Peer Review Accuracy http://t.co/ymWDtbaI
#PLoS: Cooperation between Referees and Authors Increases Peer Review Accuracy http://t.co/L6EEMhSp
Cooperation between Referees and Authors Increases Peer Review Accuracy http://t.co/sa2nFeq9
PLoS ONE: Cooperation between Referees and Authors Increases Peer Review Accuracy http://t.co/rL5L1JWH
Cooperation between Referees and Authors Increases Peer Review Accuracy http://t.co/sa2nFeq9
#PLoS: Cooperation between Referees and Authors Increases Peer Review Accuracy http://t.co/JD7wye1b
#PLoS: Cooperation between Referees and Authors Increases Peer Review Accuracy http://t.co/JD7wye1b
Research shows that open peer review increases accuracy and pay-offs for authors and reviewers http://t.co/LSXZwa18
Research shows that open peer review increases accuracy and pay-offs for authors and reviewers http://t.co/LSXZwa18
Нам нужен открытый процесс рецензирования #PLoS Cooperation between Referees and Authors Increases Peer Review Accuracy http://t.co/eBfGRAto
Research shows that open peer review increases accuracy and pay-offs for authors and reviewers http://t.co/LSXZwa18
Open cooperation in peer review between reviewers & reviewees leads to more accurate reviews: paper in @PLoSONE http://t.co/M49FAPhW
Open interactive peer review improves scientific publishing - and science as a whole. http://t.co/ybAfFeM9 Mental note, sign all reviews.
Open interactive peer review improves scientific publishing - and science as a whole. http://t.co/ybAfFeM9 Mental note, sign all reviews.
MT @nceas: Open cooperation in peer review between reviewers,reviewees leads to more accurate reviews:paper in @PLoSONE http://t.co/tR7tbhas
Open cooperation in peer review between reviewers & reviewees leads to more accurate reviews: paper in @PLoSONE http://t.co/M49FAPhW
Open cooperation in peer review between reviewers & reviewees leads to more accurate reviews: paper in @PLoSONE http://t.co/M49FAPhW
Something to think about for grants as well. MT @DecisionLab @nceas. Open cooperation leads to more accurate reviews. http://t.co/BBAHb2Bd”
Open interactive peer review improves scientific publishing - and science as a whole. http://t.co/ybAfFeM9 Mental note, sign all reviews.
POne paper Nov11 RT @jebyrnes Open interactive peer review improves scientific publishing - and science http://t.co/mqrE3m0B via @eperlste
Open interaction of reviewers and reviewees yields more accurate results. http://t.co/TEEvtsTV
From @nceas: Open cooperation in peer review between reviewers & reviewees leads to more accurate reviews. http://t.co/oIq5fbCD
Open cooperation in peer review between reviewers & reviewees leads to more accurate reviews: paper in @PLoSONE http://t.co/M49FAPhW
Open cooperation in peer review between reviewers & reviewees leads to more accurate reviews @klopiano http://t.co/3aa7HZ3W
Open cooperation in peer review between reviewers & reviewees leads to more accurate reviews: paper in @PLoSONE http://t.co/M49FAPhW
Open cooperation in peer review between reviewers & reviewees leads to more accurate reviews: paper in @PLoSONE http://t.co/M49FAPhW
Open cooperation in peer review between reviewers & reviewees leads to more accurate reviews: paper in @PLoSONE http://t.co/M49FAPhW
Open interactive peer review improves scientific publishing - and science as a whole. http://t.co/ybAfFeM9 Mental note, sign all reviews.
Open interactive peer review improves scientific publishing - and science as a whole. http://t.co/ybAfFeM9 Mental note, sign all reviews.
Open interactive peer review improves scientific publishing - and science as a whole. http://t.co/ybAfFeM9 Mental note, sign all reviews.
Open interactive peer review improves scientific publishing - and science as a whole. http://t.co/ybAfFeM9 Mental note, sign all reviews.
Open vs closed peer review in "the peer review game" #PLoS http://t.co/RfJtNpUr
Leek 2010 Cooperation between Referees & Authors Increases Peer Review Accuracy http://t.co/FIjxAbRQ open/closed peer review game study
Cooperation btwn Referees-Authors Increases Peer Review Accuracy http://t.co/EDP2IucM RT @forskningno Bedre med åpenhet http://t.co/VQk19qKW
#Cooperation between Referees and Authors Increases #Peer #Review #Accuracy -> http://t.co/ann4p2RF #gamification
RT @dgmacarthur: Intriguing... RT @simplystats We just found cooperation in peer review leads to higher accuracy. http://t.co/SkktaEKz
Interesting article pair: referee/author cooperation helps review http://t.co/JmSDkhxp + the uselessness of peer review http://t.co/7N3J9VHi
RT @dgmacarthur: Intriguing... RT @simplystats We just found cooperation in peer review leads to higher accuracy. http://t.co/SkktaEKz
Intriguing... RT @simplystats We just found cooperation in peer review leads to higher accuracy. http://t.co/SkktaEKz
@dgmacarthur @dienekesp We just found cooperation in peer review leads to higher accuracy. http://t.co/0QPml79z
#PLoS: Samenwerking referenten en auteurs verbetert peer review; online gamen als model voor peer review http://t.co/AukOGDVo