#365papers Guillera-Arroita et al 2014 Ignoring imperfect detection in biological surveys Is dangerous. https://t.co/lrQH9ENZPe
RT @AarontheEcolog: Occupancy models & the Welsh et al. paper https://t.co/qMEM5FbtOK + response https://t.co/1KzV06JyNo #ecostats15 https:…
RT @AarontheEcolog: Occupancy models & the Welsh et al. paper https://t.co/qMEM5FbtOK + response https://t.co/1KzV06JyNo #ecostats15 https:…
Occupancy models & the Welsh et al. paper https://t.co/qMEM5FbtOK + response https://t.co/1KzV06JyNo #ecostats15 https://t.co/krneVAvzW8
More debate on occupancy models in @PLOSONE http://t.co/Es21pB4q4G http://t.co/Ezxmp5ixlL
More debate on occupancy models in @PLOSONE http://t.co/Es21pB4q4G http://t.co/Ezxmp5ixlL
More debate on occupancy models in @PLOSONE http://t.co/Es21pB4q4G http://t.co/Ezxmp5ixlL
More debate on occupancy models in @PLOSONE http://t.co/Es21pB4q4G http://t.co/Ezxmp5ixlL
More debate on occupancy models in @PLOSONE http://t.co/Es21pB4q4G http://t.co/Ezxmp5ixlL
PLOS ONE: Ignoring Imperfect Detection in Surveys Is Dangerous: A Response to ‘Fitting and Interpreting Occ. Models' http://t.co/q2OalYi9iv
@DaleNimmo Dale - here's that response to the Welsh paper we discussed previously - http://t.co/QKxs3xwDcP
Big names respond to the Welsh et al paper that questioned the need to account for detectability in occupancy surveys http://t.co/QKxs3xwDcP
You loved Guru's #isec2014 closing talk, & read the paper: http://t.co/uKdgNt57QV. Now try the blog http://t.co/fjcfhrwY4v. Illuminating
Ignoring Imperfect Detection in Biological Surveys Is Dangerous: A Response to ‘Fitting and Interpreting Occu... http://t.co/n32TnkupUd
You loved Guru's #isec2014 closing talk, & read the paper: http://t.co/uKdgNt57QV. Now try the blog http://t.co/fjcfhrwY4v. Illuminating
You loved Guru's #isec2014 closing talk, & read the paper: http://t.co/uKdgNt57QV. Now try the blog http://t.co/fjcfhrwY4v. Illuminating
The link to the response paper on detection process. http://t.co/ln3r3hmapa
You loved Guru's #isec2014 closing talk, & read the paper: http://t.co/uKdgNt57QV. Now try the blog http://t.co/fjcfhrwY4v. Illuminating
You loved Guru's #isec2014 closing talk, & read the paper: http://t.co/uKdgNt57QV. Now try the blog http://t.co/fjcfhrwY4v. Illuminating
Are occupancy models worth the extra effort needed to account for detection probability? In short, yes - #PLOSONE http://t.co/bAsG9JNTx4
You loved Guru's #isec2014 closing talk, & read the paper: http://t.co/uKdgNt57QV. Now try the blog http://t.co/fjcfhrwY4v. Illuminating
Our response to the claim that ignoring imperfect detection in occupancy models can be better than accounting for it. http://t.co/Pt2YeQIXh7
Our response to the claim that ignoring imperfect detection in occupancy models can be better than accounting for it. http://t.co/Pt2YeQIXh7
A Response to ‘Fitting and Interpreting Occupancy Models' http://t.co/P0uqCP8e3K Ping @DynamicEcology
A Response to ‘Fitting and Interpreting Occupancy Models' http://t.co/P0uqCP8e3K Ping @DynamicEcology
Our response to the claim that ignoring imperfect detection in occupancy models can be better than accounting for it. http://t.co/Pt2YeQIXh7
Our response to the claim that ignoring imperfect detection in occupancy models can be better than accounting for it. http://t.co/Pt2YeQIXh7
Our response to the claim that ignoring imperfect detection in occupancy models can be better than accounting for it. http://t.co/Pt2YeQIXh7
Our response to the claim that ignoring imperfect detection in occupancy models can be better than accounting for it. http://t.co/Pt2YeQIXh7
Our response to the claim that ignoring imperfect detection in occupancy models can be better than accounting for it. http://t.co/Pt2YeQIXh7
Oh snap! The occupancy modelling folks respond to criticism via: @PLOSONE #science #ecology @mwtingley http://t.co/l205xfPym7
Oh snap! The occupancy modelling folks respond to criticism via: @PLOSONE #science #ecology @mwtingley http://t.co/l205xfPym7