RT @noelTbrewer: Less than 1% of of people who publish papers do so every year. https://t.co/3sExMsQZS4
RT @noelTbrewer: Less than 1% of of people who publish papers do so every year. https://t.co/3sExMsQZS4
RT @noelTbrewer: Less than 1% of of people who publish papers do so every year. https://t.co/3sExMsQZS4
RT @JonathanLWai: "Using the entire Scopus database...there are 15,153,100 publishing scientists (distinct author identifiers) in the perio…
RT @noelTbrewer: Less than 1% of of people who publish papers do so every year. https://t.co/3sExMsQZS4
"Using the entire Scopus database...there are 15,153,100 publishing scientists (distinct author identifiers) in the period 1996–2011. However, only 150,608 (<1%) of them have published something in each and every year in this 16-year period" https://t.c
RT @noelTbrewer: Less than 1% of of people who publish papers do so every year. https://t.co/3sExMsQZS4
Such a superb paper!
RT @noelTbrewer: Less than 1% of of people who publish papers do so every year. https://t.co/3sExMsQZS4
RT @noelTbrewer: Less than 1% of of people who publish papers do so every year. https://t.co/3sExMsQZS4
Less than 1% of of people who publish papers do so every year. https://t.co/3sExMsQZS4
@LordTensenVaps @adrianoladrika @stealthygeek It doesn't. Science tends towards the same conclusions, but it doesn't guarantee them. And as for the 1%, here it is. https://t.co/IPBVDADQiI
@Linguist_UR @rlmcelreath I don't need to believe a statement which is not justified by scientific inquiry or direct logical consequence. I don't buy that there's a god either. Also don't buy that there's magic. Show me the science that justifies the the
RT @Marek_Kwiek: Interesting, reminder! The proportion of the scientific workforce that maintains a continuous uninterrupted stream of pub…
RT @KevinBoyack: Using a different (but related) cohort - continuously publishing authors - we found something similar. The 1% (N =150,608)…
RT @Marek_Kwiek: Interesting, reminder! The proportion of the scientific workforce that maintains a continuous uninterrupted stream of pub…
RT @Marek_Kwiek: Interesting, reminder! The proportion of the scientific workforce that maintains a continuous uninterrupted stream of pub…
Interesting, reminder! The proportion of the scientific workforce that maintains a continuous uninterrupted stream of publications each & every year over many years is very limited, but it accounts for the lion’s share of researchers w. high cit. imp
RT @KevinBoyack: Using a different (but related) cohort - continuously publishing authors - we found something similar. The 1% (N =150,608)…
RT @KevinBoyack: Using a different (but related) cohort - continuously publishing authors - we found something similar. The 1% (N =150,608)…
Using a different (but related) cohort - continuously publishing authors - we found something similar. The 1% (N =150,608) of authors with a continuous presence were listed on nearly 42% of publications. https://t.co/mYEQkBmWyy
This is also a cite I use in letters, though it's a little old at this point. Only 1% of scientists published every year between 1996-20211: https://t.co/svkaMZZ2hp
Yes! Continuous Publishing Core CPC provides lion's share of papers. Survey responses from 17,000 scientists from 11 European systems show that, all in all, the 10/50 rule holds. The upper 10% (top perfomers) publish 50% of articles. Hvr they are not CPC.
The skewed distribution of #science productivity. #AcademicChatter
It is unbelievable. And it is true.
RT @KevinBoyack: It's actually even more severe than that - less than 1% of authors (those that publish every year) account for 42% of pape…
It's actually even more severe than that - less than 1% of authors (those that publish every year) account for 42% of papers - https://t.co/mYEQkBmWyy
@clairegcoleman academic population: the publishing 1% so to speak. https://t.co/IPBVDADQiI
Petite étude sur les habitudes de publications année après après année. https://t.co/vVartoDebJ
@AReligious666 @UngodlyAtheism @atheistProgress @temple_999 @The_Ouroborus Most engineers aren't even researchers. However, since I am not technically an expert on peer review, allow me to provide some citation: https://t.co/lQAXVZILJx
The 1%... https://t.co/QyoqNXqt5e
RT @uranus_2: ↓RTしたツイートの原著論文はこれ。毎年論文を公刊していない著者が99%以上。全論文の41.7%に毎年論文を出している著者が関与。1千回以上引用される論文の87.1%に毎年論文出している人が著者として関わっている。http://t.co/um42Ef…
RT @AlmaDzibGoodin: #PLOSONE: Estimates of the Continuously Publishing Core in the Scientific Workforce https://t.co/lvTOECs9Kf
#PLOSONE: Estimates of the Continuously Publishing Core in the Scientific Workforce https://t.co/lvTOECs9Kf
@connor_daren @DickyCunningham @CannabisFairy69 whats your citation rate? https://t.co/i4VjFtioQX
Only 1% of scientists publish every year (=150,608 individuals). Repeated publication 2+ 68,221 3+ 37,953 10+ 3269 https://t.co/XkK9GnI0n1
#PLOSONE: Estimates of the Continuously Publishing Core in the Scientific Workforce https://t.co/T5jPOOCK8u
@tomstafford @neuroconscience I think it's this one https://t.co/zVLcaM2ydc
RT<<1%は一見すごく少ないように感じるけど、論文の著者の中には研究者という立場の人以外も多数含まれ、対象の16年間ずっと研究者のポストに就いている人はごく一部、と考えれば、そんなものだろうと思う。元の論文は=>http://t.co/2kJESkTGKc
RT<<1%は一見すごく少ないように感じるけど、論文の著者の中には研究者という立場の人以外も多数含まれ、対象の16年間ずっと研究者のポストに就いている人はごく一部、と考えれば、そんなものだろうと思う。元の論文は=>http://t.co/2kJESkTGKc
RT<<1%は一見すごく少ないように感じるけど、論文の著者の中には研究者という立場の人以外も多数含まれ、対象の16年間ずっと研究者のポストに就いている人はごく一部、と考えれば、そんなものだろうと思う。元の論文は=>http://t.co/2kJESkTGKc
Quer ser um cientista bem-sucedido? Publique pelo menos 1 paper por ano ao longo de toda sua carreira. http://t.co/H70T0yG1yG
Study finds <1% of scientists are cited in 41.7% of all papers, and 87.1% of papers with >1000 citations #OWS... http://t.co/D4IE5JLepV
ioannidis: in case you missed it here’s the “other" top 1%—<1% of scientists produce 42% of the literature! http://t.co/qwkzZLt3m7 @PLOSONE
ioannidis: in case you missed it here’s the “other" top 1%—<1% of scientists produce 42% of the literature! http://t.co/qwkzZLt3m7 @PLOSONE
ioannidis: in case you missed it here’s the “other" top 1%—<1% of scientists produce 42% of the literature! http://t.co/qwkzZLt3m7 @PLOSONE
ioannidis: in case you missed it here’s the “other" top 1%—<1% of scientists produce 42% of the literature! http://t.co/qwkzZLt3m7 @PLOSONE
@phillbjones I completely agree. Here is the paper: http://t.co/16fx9GyxmV
@jaynedmarks References this paper: http://t.co/16fx9GyxmV
Fewer than 1% of scientists author 41% of all published papers: http://t.co/RzJ0oclKIx @PLOS
Fewer than 1% of scientists author 41% of all published papers: http://t.co/RzJ0oclKIx @PLOS
@MariuzzoAndrea prova a vedere questo http://t.co/oXwsEzPhuv BTW: ci si potrebbe interrogare su quanto le logiche dei journals "scoraggino"
Abdullah fa bene: si compra l'1% di gatekeeper che controlla journals (lo dico io non il paper, ma vedi i numeri) http://t.co/oXwsEzPhuv
#publishorperish is the new dogma for young #scientists & #researchers? http://t.co/M8SnXLPbmS @PhDForum @Write4Research @researchwhisper
The ability of a scientist to maintain a continuous stream of publication http://t.co/RvOrMXqx2j
Publication patterns>"in these cases, the research system may be exploiting the work of millions of young scientists" http://t.co/uPktQH55KD
From 1996-2011, <1% of publishing researchers accounted for 42% of all papers http://t.co/H9H0Dn1RTN - via @researchwhisper
#publishorperish is the new dogma for young #scientists & #researchers? http://t.co/M8SnXLPbmS @PhDForum @Write4Research @researchwhisper
#publishorperish is the new dogma for young #scientists & #researchers? http://t.co/M8SnXLPbmS @PhDForum @Write4Research @researchwhisper
From 15m scientists & scholars worldwide, Scopus 1996-2010 shows c.150,000 publish every year. Via @hoodedscientist http://t.co/a0zJhqQD01
#publishorperish is the new dogma for young #scientists & #researchers? http://t.co/M8SnXLPbmS @PhDForum @Write4Research @researchwhisper
#publishorperish is the new dogma for young #scientists & #researchers? http://t.co/M8SnXLPbmS @PhDForum @Write4Research @researchwhisper
From 15m scientists & scholars worldwide, Scopus 1996-2010 shows c.150,000 publish every year. Via @hoodedscientist http://t.co/a0zJhqQD01
From 15m scientists & scholars worldwide, Scopus 1996-2010 shows c.150,000 publish every year. Via @hoodedscientist http://t.co/a0zJhqQD01
#publishorperish is the new dogma for young #scientists & #researchers? http://t.co/M8SnXLPbmS @PhDForum @Write4Research @researchwhisper
Wow! 150000 scientists worldwide are publishing continuously "RT @jwbelmon: Estimates workforce http://t.co/NBaoHgvSHr the scientific 1%"
Estimates of the Continuously Publishing Core in the Scientific Workforce http://t.co/pIQytmDMlk
Wow! 150000 scientists worldwide are publishing continuously "RT @jwbelmon: Estimates workforce http://t.co/NBaoHgvSHr the scientific 1%"
Wow! 150000 scientists worldwide are publishing continuously "RT @jwbelmon: Estimates workforce http://t.co/NBaoHgvSHr the scientific 1%"
Just 1% of scientists publish every year - amazingly low. I was 'UCP-born' during the study period... http://t.co/rKi6Ozu7pA
Just 1% of scientists publish every year - amazingly low. I was 'UCP-born' during the study period... http://t.co/rKi6Ozu7pA
Gobsmacking: Only 1% of researchers publish 1 or more papers a year. http://t.co/IB6ZmiSC2e
Are you an UCP [uninterrupted, continuous presence] researcher? Just 1% of researcher are. http://t.co/BwqWlYfXVa #plosone
@simonchapman6 Just added brief comment on PLOS One http://t.co/0l9V7A3uU1 I think Ioannides jumped the shark with the one
Gobsmacking: Only 1% of researchers publish 1 or more papers a year. http://t.co/IB6ZmiSC2e
Gobsmacking: Only 1% of researchers publish 1 or more papers a year. http://t.co/IB6ZmiSC2e
Gobsmacking: Only 1% of researchers publish 1 or more papers a year. http://t.co/IB6ZmiSC2e
Gobsmacking: Only 1% of researchers publish 1 or more papers a year. http://t.co/IB6ZmiSC2e
Gobsmacking: Only 1% of researchers publish 1 or more papers a year. http://t.co/IB6ZmiSC2e
Gobsmacking: Only 1% of researchers publish 1 or more papers a year. http://t.co/IB6ZmiSC2e
Gobsmacking: Only 1% of researchers publish 1 or more papers a year. http://t.co/IB6ZmiSC2e
Gobsmacking: Only 1% of researchers publish 1 or more papers a year. http://t.co/IB6ZmiSC2e
Gobsmacking: Only 1% of researchers publish 1 or more papers a year. http://t.co/IB6ZmiSC2e
Gobsmacking: Only 1% of researchers publish 1 or more papers a year. http://t.co/IB6ZmiSC2e
Gobsmacking: Only 1% of researchers publish 1 or more papers a year. http://t.co/IB6ZmiSC2e
Gobsmacking: Only 1% of researchers publish 1 or more papers a year. http://t.co/IB6ZmiSC2e
The 1% of scientists with continuous pub record have median h-index of 21, while the other 99% have h-index of 1. http://t.co/PJAigCdAXJ
@UTS_Business #6 in Australia, global 200 for research http://t.co/eQ4yHJrUFa … We are what we publish http://t.co/5U8DKvUirr … #highered
@UTS_Business #6 in Australia, global 200 for research http://t.co/eQ4yHJrUFa … We are what we publish http://t.co/5U8DKvUirr … #highered
@Bill_Gardner @phylogenomics My guess, strong skew in the sex ratio of 1% authors. bias vs ?? http://t.co/JxUTOamHKp http://t.co/J1m8eM6RAW
@UTS_Business #6 in Australia, global top 200 for research http://t.co/PtTOFNptKa We are what we publish http://t.co/KnX9uLixw2 #highered
@UTS_Business #6 in Australia, global top 200 for research http://t.co/PtTOFNptKa We are what we publish http://t.co/KnX9uLixw2 #highered
@UTS_Business #6 in Australia, global top 200 for research http://t.co/PtTOFNptKa We are what we publish http://t.co/KnX9uLixw2 #highered
#PLOSONE: Estimates of the Continuously Publishing Core in the Scientific Workforce http://t.co/jXKLcEnPTj
Are you a UCP (uninterrupted, continuous presence) scientist?http://t.co/T42Y4fsoKK #PLOSONE #science #academia
Less than 1% of researchers published every year from 1996-2011. Their names were on 41% of all papers. http://t.co/v7xJ9UlHWd
Disruptive change needed? MT @MartyManley 1% of all scientists publish 42% of all papers (+ get most citations). http://t.co/JV6aZ4s6Ij
Disruptive change needed? MT @MartyManley 1% of all scientists publish 42% of all papers (+ get most citations). http://t.co/JV6aZ4s6Ij