@GhostfaceWiller @jayvanbavel Simple Bayesian logic for this: "interesting"=shifts your prior. Formalized eg https://t.co/gPC5F75CRR
@psmaldino @rlmcelreath Interesting! We have an old pre-repligate paper in a somewhat similar vein http://t.co/gPC5F75CRR
Are most published findings false? Maybe not, according to research by @David_G_Rand and colleagues | http://t.co/rkmbbKczx7
Are most published findings false? Maybe not, according to research by @David_G_Rand and colleagues | http://t.co/rkmbbKczx7
Are most published findings false? Maybe not, according to research by @David_G_Rand and colleagues | http://t.co/rkmbbKczx7
Are most published findings false? Maybe not, according to research by @David_G_Rand and colleagues | http://t.co/rkmbbKczx7
Are most published findings false? Maybe not, according to research by @David_G_Rand and colleagues | http://t.co/rkmbbKczx7
Are most published findings false? Maybe not, according to research by @David_G_Rand and colleagues | http://t.co/rkmbbKczx7