On the Lack of Consensus over the Meaning of Openness: An Empirical Study https://t.co/e3LBbDujEe https://t.co/Zng5FvfOj6
@benmarwick Okay, but that still doesn't mean there's a consensus on terminology. See: https://t.co/RSwRQeMnn9 @drclimate
Still work to do toward standardization: On the Lack of Consensus over the Meaning of Openness http://t.co/hpotLoZW #OAWeek2012
Still work to do toward standardization: On the Lack of Consensus over the Meaning of Openness http://t.co/hpotLoZW #OAWeek2012
Still work to do toward standardization: On the Lack of Consensus over the Meaning of Openness http://t.co/hpotLoZW #OAWeek2012
Still work to do toward standardization: On the Lack of Consensus over the Meaning of Openness http://t.co/hpotLoZW #OAWeek2012
Still work to do toward standardization: On the Lack of Consensus over the Meaning of Openness http://t.co/hpotLoZW #OAWeek2012
Still work to do toward standardization: On the Lack of Consensus over the Meaning of Openness http://t.co/hpotLoZW #OAWeek2012
Still work to do toward standardization: On the Lack of Consensus over the Meaning of Openness http://t.co/hpotLoZW #OAWeek2012
RT @biosharing: RT @CameronNeylon: RT @stevehit: On the lack of consensus over the Meaning of Openness: An Empirical Study (PLoSOne) http://t.co/1JvEBST
RT @biosharing: RT @CameronNeylon: RT @stevehit: On the lack of consensus over the Meaning of Openness: An Empirical Study (PLoSOne) http://t.co/1JvEBST
RT @stevehit: Grubb, Easterbrook, On the Lack of Consensus over the Meaning of Openness: An Empirical Study (PLoS ONE) http://t.co/lCAwSPU
RT @CameronNeylon: RT @stevehit: On the lack of consensus over the Meaning of Openness: An Empirical Study (PLoSOne) http://t.co/1JvEBST
RT @stevehit: Grubb, Easterbrook, On the Lack of Consensus over the Meaning of Openness: An Empirical Study (PLoS ONE) http://t.co/lCAwSPU
RT @stevehit: Grubb, Easterbrook, On the Lack of Consensus over the Meaning of Openness: An Empirical Study (PLoS ONE) http://t.co/lCAwSPU
RT @stevehit: Grubb, Easterbrook, On the Lack of Consensus over the Meaning of Openness: An Empirical Study (PLoS ONE) http://t.co/lCAwSPU
Grubb, Easterbrook, On the Lack of Consensus over the Meaning of Openness: An Empirical Study (PLoS ONE) http://t.co/lCAwSPU
RT @mokot: あとでよむ。PlosOne OA運動:Openの定義 http://t.co/faUb90S
あとでよむ。PlosOne OA運動:Openの定義 http://t.co/faUb90S
On the Lack of Consensus over the Meaning of Openness http://t.co/PpjLN1O
RT @BioMedCentral: On the Lack of Consensus over the Meaning of Openness http://ow.ly/67k8X #open #openaccess #openscience #opendata
RT @softmodeling: RT @SMEasterbrook: Scientists don't generally agree on what it means to make science more open. See our new paper at http://t.co/U5svV8U
RT @SMEasterbrook: Scientists don't generally agree on what it means to make science more open. See our new paper at http://t.co/U5svV8U
RT @SMEasterbrook: Scientists don't generally agree on what it means to make science more open. See our new paper at http://t.co/VBdvEih
Scientists don't generally agree on what it means to make science more open. See our new paper at http://t.co/VBdvEih