@SAMyers_lab Thanks! Yeah the concept is described in this paper https://t.co/IdvO2t4hPe
RT @JShendure: A really extraordinary piece of writing. It has been required reading for first year grad students at @uwgenome for at least…
RT @daviest_: "Focusing on interdisciplinary teams instead of interdisciplinary people reinforces standard disciplinary boundaries rather t…
"But when I think of new fields in science that have been opened, I don't think of interdisciplinary *teams* combining existing skills to solve a defined problem—I think of single interdisciplinary *people* inventing new ways to look at the world."
RT @daviest_: "Focusing on interdisciplinary teams instead of interdisciplinary people reinforces standard disciplinary boundaries rather t…
"Focusing on interdisciplinary teams instead of interdisciplinary people reinforces standard disciplinary boundaries rather than breaking them down." Sean Eddy's perspective on interdisciplinarity is something I'll be thinking about for a while: https://
Make a correction here, just realized the concept Jokob referred to is antedisciplinary. Antedisciplinary science means the science that precedes the organization of new disciplines. https://t.co/Zk5jEi4wDr
RT @daforerog: "Expecting a team of disciplinary scientists to develop a new field is like sending a team of monolingual diplomats to the U…
"Expecting a team of disciplinary scientists to develop a new field is like sending a team of monolingual diplomats to the United Nations." https://t.co/XsqoN4gJoh
RT @PLURplus: @EricLeonardis You might find Sean Eddy formerly Janelia insightful https://t.co/OGSZu9V4nn
@EricLeonardis You might find Sean Eddy formerly Janelia insightful https://t.co/OGSZu9V4nn
@lahpodcast I wouldn’t call your approach rambling generalisim - it’s ‘ante-disciplinary’ scholarship. As this piece says, ‘You want to go where a question takes you, not where your training left you.’ https://t.co/d2wz6OKAZ1
@ewanbirney Brings to mind this nice article: https://t.co/8hdRWe1B9A
Still a highly relevant article. "You want to go where a question takes you, not where your training left you." https://t.co/W1p7wVDQmA
Original Sean Eddy piece defining antedisciplinary science: the creation of mashup disciplines that building on existing knowledge but recombine it in new ways, before the new discipline has a name. Worth a read! h/t @OctantBio for link. https://t.co/O
“hey I know you have criticisms of an institution but let me just point out that it does some unrelated stuff that I think is good”
Recently was asked (keynote speech intro) 'how should I be introduced as?' - Mathematician? Computer Scientist? Bioinformatician? I am one of those "antedisciplinary people" (see https://t.co/4EFurY7FAI). I ♥️ working w/interdisciplinary teams, but don't
@lpachter I certainly hope this is true in other departments! I personally feel that Caltech Astro has become a siloed environment in which there isn't much interdisciplinary collaboration even across subfields within the department. https://t.co/hOBVcSi5K
@MiaDoesAstro Returning to Caltech, I’d urge you to consider that the Institute offers much more than just reputation & resources to students. It’s small size & ease of collaboration (choose any advisor in any program!) greatly facilitate antedisci
I love this synthesis. That's where the fun is! The full article is really worth reading: https://t.co/HdNoM8idL1
This reminds me of this excellent article on “Antedisciplinary” Science from @ribosaur. Bookmarked for revisits! https://t.co/fg1h5nW6UN
Thanks for sharing this @NavishWadhwa !
RT @NavishWadhwa: @micromotility You might enjoy this wonderful piece by @ribosaur. It seems that the "interdisciplinary problem" has been…
the expert-collider finding model PS re @MatteoCarandini interdisciplinary people & "ante-disciplinary" science https://t.co/KakoYgN5pd Human Genome = Vastly Oversold https://t.co/i93ZLrsZif ht @WiringTheBrain @KordingLab
@micromotility You might enjoy this wonderful piece by @ribosaur. It seems that the "interdisciplinary problem" has been around for a while. https://t.co/mQ9VbNDg6n
RT @srikosuri: 7. We are ante-disciplinary – this means we tend to hire generalists that are often working across fields. This has downside…
Antedisciplinary, it is then!
7. We are ante-disciplinary – this means we tend to hire generalists that are often working across fields. This has downsides of having fewer deep experts in any one field, and makes particular strategies harder. H/T @ribosaur piece : https://t.co/yvP18Xl8
@vdlorenzo_CNB That's mostly because decision-makers are sectorial and don't have the knowledge to span multiple fields. New generations are trained for this, we just need a turnover. It's not even a new issue, Watson had the same, but the system wasn't as
@lisa_iannattone @Lactu_Borde And I love this article (via @landrychristian) : https://t.co/ZAbFgOtibg
"when I think of new fields in science that have been opened, I don't think of interdisciplinary TEAMS combining existing skills to solve a defined problem—I think of single interdisciplinary PEOPLE inventing new ways to look at the world" -@ribosaur welco
RT @FertigLab: Amazing summary of being a computational biologist -- still highly relevant https://t.co/ypgnuPZe8W
#PLOSCompBio: “Antedisciplinary” Science https://t.co/ePkYR42whZ
Enjoyed this piece. Super relevant as we continue to expand our analyses!
Rise of the antedisciplinary science and scientists !!
'We're still not quite sure what “computational biology” means, but we seem to agree that it's an interdisciplinary field, requiring skills in computer science, molecular biology, statistics, mathematics, and more.' https://t.co/ziRbRpkSma
RT @FertigLab: Amazing summary of being a computational biologist -- still highly relevant https://t.co/ypgnuPZe8W
RT @FertigLab: Amazing summary of being a computational biologist -- still highly relevant https://t.co/ypgnuPZe8W
RT @FertigLab: Amazing summary of being a computational biologist -- still highly relevant https://t.co/ypgnuPZe8W
RT @FertigLab: Amazing summary of being a computational biologist -- still highly relevant https://t.co/ypgnuPZe8W
RT @FertigLab: Amazing summary of being a computational biologist -- still highly relevant https://t.co/ypgnuPZe8W
Amazing summary of being a computational biologist -- still highly relevant https://t.co/ypgnuPZe8W
RT @daforerog: “Antedisciplinary” Science https://t.co/XsqoN4gJoh
“Antedisciplinary” Science https://t.co/XsqoN4gJoh
Really enjoyed rereading this piece after hearing Ben Lehner mention it on @nightsciencepod https://t.co/7b86mQ4dm5
RT @n8_upham: "Expecting a team of disciplinary scientists to develop a new field is like sending a team of monolingual diplomats to the Un…
RT @n8_upham: "Expecting a team of disciplinary scientists to develop a new field is like sending a team of monolingual diplomats to the Un…
"Expecting a team of disciplinary scientists to develop a new field is like sending a team of monolingual diplomats to the United Nations." Great reminder that scientific revolutions have been precipitated by people with multi-disciplinary expertise - not
A really interesting take on interdisciplinary science
RT @fieldomics: I really like this perspective, curious to know what others think. "Focusing on interdisciplinary teams instead of interdi…
RT @fieldomics: I really like this perspective, curious to know what others think. "Focusing on interdisciplinary teams instead of interdi…
I really like this perspective, curious to know what others think. "Focusing on interdisciplinary teams instead of interdisciplinary people reinforces standard disciplinary boundaries rather than breaking them down." https://t.co/1fk4XlS12q
Fitting paper for all of us who are in interdisciplinary disciplines
@kdc509 Building skills takes time, you are doing awesome! 💪 Also, I’d suggest a look at this paper by @ribosaur, I reread it when I’m feeling the same way (often). https://t.co/kQR5Iecfo4
"Focusing on interdisciplinary teams instead of interdisciplinary people reinforces standard disciplinary boundaries rather than breaking them down." ~ Eddy 2005 https://t.co/GYp0k1lmxJ
super nice opinion piece, prob. resonate with many. My favourite quote: 'Expecting a team of disciplinary scientists to develop a new field is like sending a team of monolingual diplomats to the United Nations.'
RT @NeuroStats: @tpq__ Have you read Sean Eddy's antedisciplinary science? If not, you might really like it. https://t.co/vtO0uJkPLU
@tpq__ Have you read Sean Eddy's antedisciplinary science? If not, you might really like it. https://t.co/vtO0uJkPLU
"Every generation, we somehow compress our knowledge just enough to leave room in our brains for one more generation of progress. This is not going to stop." How to avoid anxiety about interdisciplinary research: “Antedisciplinary” Science https://t.co/N
@hopihoekstra @ribosaur @MCB_Harvard and his 💎 perspective on getting out of one's comfort zone and acquire skills to answer a bold question rather be a domain expert. "You want to go where a question takes you, not where your training left you." https://
@hopihoekstra @ribosaur @MCB_Harvard Welcome! Definitely looking for all the @ribosaur hot takes. This oldie but goodie is one of my favorites: https://t.co/yvP18Xl8Sk
RT @ultimape: "New science needs to be judged on its merits, not by the disciplinary credentials of the people doing it—particularly in fas…
"New science needs to be judged on its merits, not by the disciplinary credentials of the people doing it—particularly in fast-moving interdisciplinary areas where any formal training may be outdated anyway." https://t.co/p3af4nNgEB https://t.co/4Bl9KaBdof
RT @JShendure: A really extraordinary piece of writing. It has been required reading for first year grad students at @uwgenome for at least…
RT @landrychristian: I’d like people deciding to develop all these new interdisciplinary funding programs in Canada to read this “Focusing…
RT @minouye271: Really enjoying reading Sean Eddy's "Antedisciplinary Science" piece all these years later @PLOSCompBiol https://t.co/AcRA…
RT @BrunLabCaulo: Howard Berg: “The trend … seems to be for interdisciplinary collaborations, where to compete you need to find principal i…
Really enjoying reading Sean Eddy's "Antedisciplinary Science" piece all these years later @PLOSCompBiol https://t.co/AcRAEgzZgJ https://t.co/5l8lpkDV9n
RT @landrychristian: I’d like people deciding to develop all these new interdisciplinary funding programs in Canada to read this “Focusing…
RT @landrychristian: I’d like people deciding to develop all these new interdisciplinary funding programs in Canada to read this “Focusing…
Howard Berg: “The trend … seems to be for interdisciplinary collaborations, where to compete you need to find principal investigators from different disciplines… Is one allowed to collaborate with oneself? I think it vital that we maintain support for indi
though I disagree about the focus on single 'pioneer' scientists, it's still an interesting read. And a bit depressing for a cross-disciplinary scientist such as myself...
RT @neely615: “Antedisciplinary” Science by Sean Eddy, a now 16 year old perspective I wish I had read sooner (I struggle with labels, espe…
Wow. I wish I had read this sooner. Reads like my manifesto. #antedisciplinary #pioneerresearch #multidisciplinary
RT @landrychristian: I’d like people deciding to develop all these new interdisciplinary funding programs in Canada to read this “Focusing…
RT @neely615: “Antedisciplinary” Science by Sean Eddy, a now 16 year old perspective I wish I had read sooner (I struggle with labels, espe…
RT @landrychristian: I’d like people deciding to develop all these new interdisciplinary funding programs in Canada to read this “Focusing…
I’d like people deciding to develop all these new interdisciplinary funding programs in Canada to read this “Focusing on interdisciplinary teams instead of interdisciplinary people reinforces standard disciplinary boundaries rather than breaking them down”
RT @neely615: “Antedisciplinary” Science by Sean Eddy, a now 16 year old perspective I wish I had read sooner (I struggle with labels, espe…
RT @neely615: “Antedisciplinary” Science by Sean Eddy, a now 16 year old perspective I wish I had read sooner (I struggle with labels, espe…
RT @neely615: “Antedisciplinary” Science by Sean Eddy, a now 16 year old perspective I wish I had read sooner (I struggle with labels, espe…
RT @neely615: “Antedisciplinary” Science by Sean Eddy, a now 16 year old perspective I wish I had read sooner (I struggle with labels, espe…
RT @JShendure: A really extraordinary piece of writing. It has been required reading for first year grad students at @uwgenome for at least…
RT @neely615: “Antedisciplinary” Science by Sean Eddy, a now 16 year old perspective I wish I had read sooner (I struggle with labels, espe…
RT @JShendure: A really extraordinary piece of writing. It has been required reading for first year grad students at @uwgenome for at least…
RT @JShendure: A really extraordinary piece of writing. It has been required reading for first year grad students at @uwgenome for at least…
RT @neely615: “Antedisciplinary” Science by Sean Eddy, a now 16 year old perspective I wish I had read sooner (I struggle with labels, espe…
RT @JShendure: A really extraordinary piece of writing. It has been required reading for first year grad students at @uwgenome for at least…
RT @JShendure: A really extraordinary piece of writing. It has been required reading for first year grad students at @uwgenome for at least…
RT @neely615: “Antedisciplinary” Science by Sean Eddy, a now 16 year old perspective I wish I had read sooner (I struggle with labels, espe…
RT @JShendure: A really extraordinary piece of writing. It has been required reading for first year grad students at @uwgenome for at least…
RT @JShendure: A really extraordinary piece of writing. It has been required reading for first year grad students at @uwgenome for at least…
RT @JShendure: A really extraordinary piece of writing. It has been required reading for first year grad students at @uwgenome for at least…
RT @neely615: “Antedisciplinary” Science by Sean Eddy, a now 16 year old perspective I wish I had read sooner (I struggle with labels, espe…
RT @JShendure: A really extraordinary piece of writing. It has been required reading for first year grad students at @uwgenome for at least…
So many pearls in this Sean Eddy piece from 2005 that echoes Brenner more than a little bit. I don’t think we’ve learned the lesson yet. https://t.co/0zdEHdEJ7p
a nice read from Sean Eddy: “You want to go where a question takes you, not where your training left you.”
"Expecting a team of disciplinary scientists to develop a new field is like sending a team of monolingual diplomats to the United Nations." Thought-provoking piece from Sean Eddy, 2005, on "antedisciplinary" science. https://t.co/eXfnwM4P6Q
Does interdisciplinary science really require large teams of disciplinary experts? Or rather a few people who know just enough of the many things they do? Great read, indeed. Thanks @LabGrosshans for pointing it out.