↓ Skip to main content

PLOS

What Works? Strategies to Increase Reproductive, Maternal and Child Health in Difficult to Access Mountainous Locations: A Systematic Literature Review

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, February 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
policy
2 policy sources
twitter
18 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
46 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
380 Mendeley
Title
What Works? Strategies to Increase Reproductive, Maternal and Child Health in Difficult to Access Mountainous Locations: A Systematic Literature Review
Published in
PLOS ONE, February 2014
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0087683
Pubmed ID
Authors

Abbey Byrne, Andrew Hodge, Eliana Jimenez-Soto, Alison Morgan

Abstract

Geography poses serious challenges to delivery of health services and is a well documented marker of inequity. Maternal, newborn and child health (MNCH) outcomes are poorer in mountainous regions of low and lower-middle income countries due to geographical inaccessibility combined with other barriers: poorer quality services, persistent cultural and traditional practices and lower socioeconomic and educational status. Reaching universal coverage goals will require attention for remote mountain settings. This study aims to identify strategies to address barriers to reproductive MNCH (RMNCH) service utilisation in difficult-to-reach mountainous regions in low and lower-middle income settings worldwide.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 18 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 380 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Indonesia 1 <1%
Bolivia, Plurinational State of 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Nigeria 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Philippines 1 <1%
Unknown 372 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 98 26%
Researcher 52 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 33 9%
Student > Bachelor 28 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 19 5%
Other 71 19%
Unknown 79 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 101 27%
Nursing and Health Professions 54 14%
Social Sciences 53 14%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 17 4%
Psychology 10 3%
Other 48 13%
Unknown 97 26%