↓ Skip to main content

PLOS

Physical Factors Influencing Pleasant Touch during Tactile Exploration

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, November 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
patent
3 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
71 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
119 Mendeley
Title
Physical Factors Influencing Pleasant Touch during Tactile Exploration
Published in
PLOS ONE, November 2013
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0079085
Pubmed ID
Authors

Anne Klöcker, Michael Wiertlewski, Vincent Théate, Vincent Hayward, Jean-Louis Thonnard

Abstract

When scanning surfaces, humans perceive some of their physical attributes. These percepts are frequently accompanied by a sensation of (un)pleasantness. We therefore hypothesized that aspects of the mechanical activity induced by scanning surfaces with fingertips could be objectively associated with a pleasantness sensation. Previously, we developed a unidimensional measure of pleasantness, the Pleasant Touch Scale, quantifying the pleasantness level of 37 different materials. Findings of this study suggested that the sensation of pleasantness was influenced by the average magnitude of the frictional forces brought about by sliding the finger on the surface, and by the surface topography. In the present study, we correlated (i) characteristics of the fluctuations of frictional forces resulting from the interaction between the finger and the surface asperities as well as (ii) the average friction with the sensation of pleasantness.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 119 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Belgium 2 2%
Japan 1 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 114 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 38 32%
Researcher 14 12%
Student > Master 12 10%
Student > Bachelor 8 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 5%
Other 21 18%
Unknown 20 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 25 21%
Psychology 17 14%
Neuroscience 14 12%
Computer Science 10 8%
Materials Science 6 5%
Other 19 16%
Unknown 28 24%