@nicholaraihani Both @drbrocktagon & I went public as reviewers of a paper which got published despite concerns https://t.co/z1eLN7sB9H 1/2
@lteytelman @surt_lab Here's a case where both @drbrocktagon & I added our reviews on @PLOSOne http://t.co/41Dw1WSQ7V
@lteytelman @surt_lab Here's a case where both @drbrocktagon & I added our reviews on @PLOSOne http://t.co/41Dw1WSQ7V
@lteytelman @surt_lab Here's a case where both @drbrocktagon & I added our reviews on @PLOSOne http://t.co/41Dw1WSQ7V
@lteytelman @surt_lab Here's a case where both @drbrocktagon & I added our reviews on @PLOSOne http://t.co/41Dw1WSQ7V
@lteytelman @surt_lab Here's a case where both @drbrocktagon & I added our reviews on @PLOSOne http://t.co/41Dw1WSQ7V
#PLOSONE: Brain Responses to Words in 2-Year-Olds with Autism Predict Developmental Outcomes at Age 6 http://t.co/vV7xt3cPFD
Brain Responses to Words in 2-Year-Olds with Autism Predict Developmental Outcomes at Age 6 http://t.co/3Obu1H0I51
Patricia Kuhl response to @drbrocktagon review of her @PLOSONE paper http://t.co/lhSsxwHRG9 #autism
I've responded to a comment on my comment on Kuhl et al @PLOSOne #autism ERP paper http://t.co/i0mEwQQzAa
I've responded to a comment on my comment on Kuhl et al @PLOSOne #autism ERP paper http://t.co/i0mEwQQzAa
Brain responses to words in 2-year-olds with #autism predict developmental outcomes at age 6 http://t.co/FaiKBmTQxX
Patricia Kuhl has posted her response to my review of her @PLOSONE paper http://t.co/csgBaCZG5a cc @deevybee
@JamesKilner @DrBrocktagon @PLOSONE Yes, Kuhl has provided her list of replies to Jon's comments http://t.co/i0mEwQQzAa
Patricia Kuhl response to @drbrocktagon review of her @PLOSONE paper http://t.co/lhSsxwHRG9 #autism
Patricia Kuhl has posted her response to my review of her @PLOSONE paper http://t.co/csgBaCZG5a cc @deevybee
Patricia Kuhl has posted her response to my review of her @PLOSONE paper http://t.co/csgBaCZG5a cc @deevybee
Shorter Kuhl: Considering non-media-friendly explanations for our data was beyond the scope of the paper http://t.co/csgBaCZG5a
RT @DrBrocktagon: Shorter Kuhl: Considering non-media-friendly explanations for our data was beyond the scope of the paper http://t.co/csgBaCZG5a
Shorter Kuhl: Considering non-media-friendly explanations for our data was beyond the scope of the paper http://t.co/csgBaCZG5a
Patricia Kuhl has posted her response to my review of her @PLOSONE paper http://t.co/csgBaCZG5a cc @deevybee
"Planned comparisons were made at all individual electrode sites" Patricia Kuhl really should read @JamesKilner http://t.co/csgBaCZG5a
Patricia Kuhl has posted her response to my review of her @PLOSONE paper http://t.co/csgBaCZG5a cc @deevybee
I think comments should be published with paper MT @deevybee1 Critical @PLOSOne comments from 2 reviewers of a paper. http://t.co/V6y5WxdTPj
I think comments should be published with paper MT @deevybee1 Critical @PLOSOne comments from 2 reviewers of a paper. http://t.co/V6y5WxdTPj
.@mattjhodgkinson thx Matt for clarification. I note possible reasons why ed overruled reviewers in reply to comment http://t.co/i0mEwQQzAa
Is this a first? Critical @PLOSOne comments from 2 reviewers of a paper. http://t.co/zfq2tUyeg0
Is this a first? Critical @PLOSOne comments from 2 reviewers of a paper. http://t.co/zfq2tUyeg0
More comment from @deevybee on Kuhl et al's (post hoc) predicting-autism-outcomes-with-ERPs paper http://t.co/EIJvUhhHaM
I've responded to a comment on my comment on Kuhl et al @PLOSOne #autism ERP paper http://t.co/i0mEwQQzAa
I've responded to a comment on my comment on Kuhl et al @PLOSOne #autism ERP paper http://t.co/i0mEwQQzAa
I've responded to a comment on my comment on Kuhl et al @PLOSOne #autism ERP paper http://t.co/i0mEwQQzAa
I've responded to a comment on my comment on Kuhl et al @PLOSOne #autism ERP paper http://t.co/i0mEwQQzAa
I've responded to a comment on my comment on Kuhl et al @PLOSOne #autism ERP paper http://t.co/i0mEwQQzAa
1/3 Brain Responses to Words in 2-Year-Olds with Autism Predict Developmental Outcomes at Age 6 (Kuhl e.a., 2013). http://t.co/KxZyBBHrT8
RT@utafrith More comments on Kuhl et al by @deevybee referring to @jameskilner piece on why post hoc ERP is bad: http://t.co/ZItFaRQ0AJ
Brain responses in children w/ #ASD at age 2 predicts #language, #behavior & #cognition in those children at 4 and 6. http://t.co/vx3nOvcedd
Researchers have demonstrated that brain responses to words in children with autism at age two strongly predict... http://t.co/BAJlgHb3eU
Reviewers voice concerns with highly publicised study in PLOS One: http://t.co/dXIs2XnU3s Now waiting for the author & editor to respond...
Is this a first? Critical @PLOSOne comments from 2 reviewers of a paper. http://t.co/zfq2tUyeg0
Is this a first? Critical @PLOSOne comments from 2 reviewers of a paper. http://t.co/zfq2tUyeg0
Is this a first? Critical @PLOSOne comments from 2 reviewers of a paper. http://t.co/zfq2tUyeg0
Is this a first? Critical @PLOSOne comments from 2 reviewers of a paper. http://t.co/zfq2tUyeg0
Brain responses predict autism outcomes http://t.co/gA9oip7kPF OR not letting the data get in way of a good story http://t.co/csgBaCZG5a
Brain responses predict autism outcomes http://t.co/gA9oip7kPF OR not letting the data get in way of a good story http://t.co/csgBaCZG5a
Post-publication publication of pre-publication reviews RT @deevybee Critical @PLOSOne comments from 2 reviewers http://t.co/cBBHxlnTXf
RT@deevybee: Is this a first? Critical @PLOSOne comments from 2 reviewers of a paper http://t.co/z7NuhODvxS > really interesting to see this
Is this a first? Critical @PLOSOne comments from 2 reviewers of a paper. http://t.co/zfq2tUyeg0
RT@deevybee: Is this a first? Critical @PLOSOne comments from 2 reviewers of a paper http://t.co/z7NuhODvxS > really interesting to see this
I am liking that reviewers are posting their reviews as comments to a publication in #plosone http://t.co/GBUCzlxrfy
Is this a first? Critical @PLOSOne comments from 2 reviewers of a paper. http://t.co/zfq2tUyeg0
Is this a first? Critical @PLOSOne comments from 2 reviewers of a paper. http://t.co/zfq2tUyeg0
Is this a first? Critical @PLOSOne comments from 2 reviewers of a paper. http://t.co/zfq2tUyeg0
Is this a first? Critical @PLOSOne comments from 2 reviewers of a paper. http://t.co/zfq2tUyeg0
Post-publication publication of pre-publication reviews RT @deevybee Critical @PLOSOne comments from 2 reviewers http://t.co/cBBHxlnTXf
Is this a first? Critical @PLOSOne comments from 2 reviewers of a paper. http://t.co/zfq2tUyeg0
Is this a first? Critical @PLOSOne comments from 2 reviewers of a paper. http://t.co/zfq2tUyeg0
Is this a first? Critical @PLOSOne comments from 2 reviewers of a paper. http://t.co/zfq2tUyeg0
Post-publication publication of pre-publication reviews RT @deevybee Critical @PLOSOne comments from 2 reviewers http://t.co/cBBHxlnTXf
Post-publication publication of pre-publication reviews RT @deevybee Critical @PLOSOne comments from 2 reviewers http://t.co/cBBHxlnTXf
Is this a first? Critical @PLOSOne comments from 2 reviewers of a paper. http://t.co/zfq2tUyeg0
new era! MT @PsychScientists: Post-pub publication of pre-pub reviews. Critical @PLOSOne comments by @deevybee http://t.co/moITAbyCHS
Is this a first? Critical @PLOSOne comments from 2 reviewers of a paper. http://t.co/zfq2tUyeg0
Post-publication publication of pre-publication reviews RT @deevybee Critical @PLOSOne comments from 2 reviewers http://t.co/cBBHxlnTXf
Is this a first? Critical @PLOSOne comments from 2 reviewers of a paper. http://t.co/zfq2tUyeg0
Is this a first? Critical @PLOSOne comments from 2 reviewers of a paper. http://t.co/zfq2tUyeg0
Is this a first? Critical @PLOSOne comments from 2 reviewers of a paper. http://t.co/zfq2tUyeg0
Is this a first? Critical @PLOSOne comments from 2 reviewers of a paper. http://t.co/zfq2tUyeg0
RT @deevybee: Is this a first? Critical @PLOSOne comments from 2 reviewers of a paper. http://t.co/bEakumTzbw
Is this a first? Critical @PLOSOne comments from 2 reviewers of a paper. http://t.co/zfq2tUyeg0
Is this a first? Critical @PLOSOne comments from 2 reviewers of a paper. http://t.co/zfq2tUyeg0
Is this a first? Critical @PLOSOne comments from 2 reviewers of a paper. http://t.co/zfq2tUyeg0
Is this a first? Critical @PLOSOne comments from 2 reviewers of a paper. http://t.co/zfq2tUyeg0
Is this a first? Critical @PLOSOne comments from 2 reviewers of a paper. http://t.co/zfq2tUyeg0
Is this a first? Critical @PLOSOne comments from 2 reviewers of a paper. http://t.co/zfq2tUyeg0
Comments detailing concerns from @DrBrocktagon & @deevybee on @PLOSONE "ERPs predict autism outcome" paper http://t.co/tkiMdiHlr5"
@autismcrisis ERP methodology in question MT @deevybee Reviewer (me) comments on ERP prediction of #autism outcome. http://t.co/GMTrj2yLJ6
Brain responses predict autism outcomes http://t.co/gA9oip7kPF OR not letting the data get in way of a good story http://t.co/csgBaCZG5a
Popular treatments don't predict autistic outcomes (2 to 6yrs) but ERPs to words do? http://t.co/EgUH4vy3xX small-N, massive attrition, etc
Turns out @deevybee also reviewed @PLOSONE "ERPs predict autism outcome" paper by Kuhl & had major concerns too http://t.co/XacChOn3Vg
Turns out @deevybee also reviewed @PLOSONE "ERPs predict autism outcome" paper by Kuhl & had major concerns too http://t.co/XacChOn3Vg
useful @jameskilner piece lays out why post hoc ERP bad: cited in my comment here on Kuhl et al http://t.co/i0mEwQQzAa
autism predictors, ERP paper, comment by @deevybee, http://t.co/ri5WzuCbcU .. (replicability, post-hoc, ..)
Brain responses predict autism outcomes http://t.co/gA9oip7kPF OR not letting the data get in way of a good story http://t.co/csgBaCZG5a
3/3 Vraagtekens bij ERP studie @deevybee: Another reviewer (me) comments.. paper on ERP prediction of #autism. http://t.co/HY4943Uei7
2/3 Vraagtekens ERP studie @drbrocktagon: original review of Kuhl ERP autism study -see @PLOSOne comment http://t.co/9bPjiUQGOv
1/3 Brain Responses to Words in 2-Year-Olds with Autism Predict Developmental Outcomes at Age 6 (Kuhl e.a., 2013). http://t.co/KxZyBBHrT8
But before you get too enthusiastic, you'd better read these critical comments from @deevybee @DrBrocktagon http://t.co/yaHToXuqiX 2/2
Another reviewer (me) comments on PLOS One paper on ERP prediction of #autism outcome. http://t.co/i0mEwQQzAa
More comments on Kuhl et al by @deevybee referring to @jameskilner piece on why post hoc ERP is bad: http://t.co/t3Up97Z4bn
More comments on Kuhl et al by @deevybee referring to @jameskilner piece on why post hoc ERP is bad: http://t.co/t3Up97Z4bn
More comments on Kuhl et al by @deevybee referring to @jameskilner piece on why post hoc ERP is bad: http://t.co/t3Up97Z4bn
More comments on Kuhl et al by @deevybee referring to @jameskilner piece on why post hoc ERP is bad: http://t.co/t3Up97Z4bn
Another reviewer (me) comments on PLOS One paper on ERP prediction of #autism outcome. http://t.co/i0mEwQQzAa
useful @jameskilner piece lays out why post hoc ERP bad: cited in my comment here on Kuhl et al http://t.co/i0mEwQQzAa
Another reviewer (me) comments on PLOS One paper on ERP prediction of #autism outcome. http://t.co/i0mEwQQzAa