| Title |
Equivalence of Conventionally-Derived and Parthenote-Derived Human Embryonic Stem Cells
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLOS ONE, January 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0014499 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Julie V. Harness, Nikolay A. Turovets, Magdalene J. Seiler, Gabriel Nistor, Gulsah Altun, Larissa S. Agapova, David Ferguson, Louise C. Laurent, Jeanne F. Loring, Hans S. Keirstead |
| Abstract |
As human embryonic stem cell (hESC) lines can be derived via multiple means, it is important to determine particular characteristics of individual lines that may dictate the applications to which they are best suited. The objective of this work was to determine points of equivalence and differences between conventionally-derived hESC and parthenote-derived hESC lines (phESC) in the undifferentiated state and during neural differentiation. |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 31 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Mexico | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 30 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 14 | 45% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 10% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 3 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 6% |
| Student > Master | 2 | 6% |
| Other | 2 | 6% |
| Unknown | 5 | 16% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 16 | 52% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 5 | 16% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 10% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 3% |
| Neuroscience | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 5 | 16% |