@Psychiatrie_cz Naštěstí to s dost velkou mírou jistoty není pravda. Stejně jako většina studií v oblasti primingu, i priming "inteligencí" nefunguje; tuhle oblast psychologie je načase vyškrtat z učebnic. Poměrně pečlivá studie například zde: https://t.c
@MartineFransse1 @FKeuleneer @lucasbergkamp Ik refereer met de gedragsbeïnvloedende techniek van mentale ‘priming’ naar het volgende onderzoek: https://t.co/rAVK3h2wkj
@siracusa again, I agree with the premise of the article; but I have read too many studies like this: https://t.co/nqE9tS8MKu
professorという単語をプライミングされると知的行動が増加し、soccer hooliganという単語をプライミングされると知的行動が減るという現象は確認できないデタラメであることを9つの実験とベイズ分析で確認 http://t.co/oIrJzVTdw9
@lakens What do you make of the discrepancy between your conclusion about prof. priming and Francis' conclusion? http://t.co/LIrLFLwqsZ
Paper met paar experimenten die Dijksterhuis aanhaalt, bv denken aan professoren maakt je (tijdelijk) slimmer http://t.co/wtzs6qLr6B
Priming Intelligent Behavior: An Elusive Phenomenon http://t.co/VqZR6fjVNQ
Kun kognitiivisen sosiaalipsykologian perusilmiöltä ollaan vetämässä mattoa alta: "no priming effects, sorry"... http://t.co/WqHZY5LmTq
Priming Intelligent Behavior: An Elusive Phenomenon http://t.co/JZdhO7xi1v
Priming Intelligent Behavior: An Elusive Phenomenon http://t.co/JZdhO7xi1v
More about those #social #priming experiments - can they be replicated? http://t.co/5NVRIumOjD
More about those #social #priming experiments - can they be replicated? http://t.co/uGPAWzrv5d
Very interesting twist RT @RolfZwaan Greg Francis' power analysis of the Dijksterhuis experiments. http://t.co/0ddqRkAqTO …
In @PLOSONE Intelligence priming, though widely accepted, cannot be replicated in 9 experiments http://t.co/N0Z7ff66I5
In @PlosOne Intelligence priming, though widely accepted, cannot be replicated in 9 experiements. http://t.co/PPACGzrTZi
#PLOSONE: Priming Intelligent Behavior: An Elusive Phenomenon http://t.co/MDLW3cyV70
On exasperation: I'm thinking about contrast btw this comment http://t.co/Ws0qWO3KTv and this by same author http://t.co/a8MsqiiNoo
Priming Intelligent Behavior: An Elusive Phenomenon http://t.co/0jdF1J11iS
#psychology #psicologia priming effect: the importance of the environment http://t.co/EB2xbopxty
Priming professor(s) require(s) larger samples. Applies to both original study and replication. http://t.co/YJLHPPgpzx
Priming professor(s) require(s) larger samples. Applies to both original study and replication. http://t.co/YJLHPPgpzx
Priming professor(s) require(s) larger samples. Applies to both original study and replication. http://t.co/YJLHPPgpzx
Interesante análisis de Gregory Francis de los experimentos de priming de Dijksterhuis http://t.co/xuwU2SvRqO
@ProfAndyField @vinwalsh @social_brains Seriously; see the author's reply, they were unimpressed as well http://t.co/b0nhoYkkXs
Greg Francis weighs in, arguing that the original Dijksterhuis results weren't even good evidence for social priming: http://t.co/CI4iAD8mps
Francis comment on the power of the original Dijksterhuis paper that led to Shanks paper. Includes R code: try it out http://t.co/NZnx7Ix8BN
Very interesting twist RT @RolfZwaan Greg Francis' power analysis of the Dijksterhuis experiments. http://t.co/0ddqRkAqTO …
Very interesting twist RT @RolfZwaan Greg Francis' power analysis of the Dijksterhuis experiments. http://t.co/0ddqRkAqTO …
Francis' evaluation of Dijksterhuis' studies. Interesting, but using today's standards to evaluate prior papers. http://t.co/JB8XzRMEC2 …
Very interesting twist RT @RolfZwaan Greg Francis' power analysis of the Dijksterhuis experiments. http://t.co/0ddqRkAqTO …
Very interesting twist RT @RolfZwaan Greg Francis' power analysis of the Dijksterhuis experiments. http://t.co/0ddqRkAqTO …
Great plos1 comment on power/multiple tests following replication problems. Linked .zip file is called "Hooligans"! http://t.co/YJx9zPiozL
Whoo, boy. RT @RolfZwaan Greg Francis' power analysis of the Dijksterhuis experiments. http://t.co/LIrLFLwqsZ …
Whoo, boy. RT @RolfZwaan Greg Francis' power analysis of the Dijksterhuis experiments. http://t.co/LIrLFLwqsZ …
Greg Francis' power analysis of the Dijksterhuis experiments. http://t.co/Y67jMTewPB
Greg Francis' power analysis of the Dijksterhuis experiments. http://t.co/Y67jMTewPB
Greg Francis' power analysis of the Dijksterhuis experiments. http://t.co/Y67jMTewPB
Greg Francis' power analysis of the Dijksterhuis experiments. http://t.co/Y67jMTewPB
Whoo, boy. RT @RolfZwaan Greg Francis' power analysis of the Dijksterhuis experiments. http://t.co/LIrLFLwqsZ …
Greg Francis' power analysis of the Dijksterhuis experiments. http://t.co/Y67jMTewPB
RT @ProfAndyField How NOT to respond to someone failing to replicate your work http://t.co/exlQMvK2AN
@RolfZwaan that is part of Dijksterhuis rebuttal at Plosone http://t.co/kAHWcWcwTK
But not NEARLY as interesting as comments at the paper itself! @PLOSONE accused of sharing confidential commentary: http://t.co/EP5A8buufy
@StuartJRitchie @davenuss79 So you were unconvinced by any of the criticisms in Dijksterhuis comment? http://t.co/a8MsqiiNoo
Can't replicate my work? well, sir, I can't replicate your replication. The intelligence priming debate: http://t.co/2sFqSdBSld
Scientific replication isn't so simple. Even the posner & snarc effects r easy NOT to get if small details r changed. http://t.co/ShAMFrV28Y
@bmahersciwriter @noahWG Reassurance from editors about this issue posted earlier today http://t.co/RoRCStcbbt
But not NEARLY as interesting as comments at the paper itself! @PLOSONE accused of sharing confidential commentary: http://t.co/EP5A8buufy
Scientific replication isn't so simple. Even the posner & snarc effects r easy NOT to get if small details r changed. http://t.co/ShAMFrV28Y
o_O MT @MichelleNMeyer: @criener the best part about this commentary is "no competing interests to declare" http://t.co/kOx4JyZVHB
But not NEARLY as interesting as comments at the paper itself! @PLOSONE accused of sharing confidential commentary: http://t.co/EP5A8buufy
On exasperation: I'm thinking about contrast btw this comment http://t.co/Ws0qWO3KTv and this by same author http://t.co/a8MsqiiNoo
But not NEARLY as interesting as comments at the paper itself! @PLOSONE accused of sharing confidential commentary: http://t.co/EP5A8buufy
Also worth reading the (weak) response from Dijksterhuis: http://t.co/4U12QAAWUs And the authors' reply to that: http://t.co/CZLfE3c4Gn
But not NEARLY as interesting as comments at the paper itself! @PLOSONE accused of sharing confidential commentary: http://t.co/EP5A8buufy
o_O MT @noahWG Not NEARLY as interesting as comments at @PLOSONE itself - accused of sharing confidential commentary http://t.co/Pcr8iTyuX2
On exasperation: I'm thinking about contrast btw this comment http://t.co/Ws0qWO3KTv and this by same author http://t.co/a8MsqiiNoo
But not NEARLY as interesting as comments at the paper itself! @PLOSONE accused of sharing confidential commentary: http://t.co/EP5A8buufy
But not NEARLY as interesting as comments at the paper itself! @PLOSONE accused of sharing confidential commentary: http://t.co/EP5A8buufy
o_O MT @noahWG Not NEARLY as interesting as comments at @PLOSONE itself - accused of sharing confidential commentary http://t.co/Pcr8iTyuX2
But not NEARLY as interesting as comments at the paper itself! @PLOSONE accused of sharing confidential commentary: http://t.co/EP5A8buufy
But not NEARLY as interesting as comments at the paper itself! @PLOSONE accused of sharing confidential commentary: http://t.co/EP5A8buufy
Scientific replication isn't so simple. Even the posner & snarc effects r easy NOT to get if small details r changed. http://t.co/ShAMFrV28Y
Djiksterhuis replies to claims his social priming studies don't replicate http://t.co/cvJQu38P71
Scientific replication isn't so simple. Even the posner & snarc effects r easy NOT to get if small details r changed. http://t.co/ShAMFrV28Y
Scientific replication isn't so simple. Even the posner & snarc effects r easy NOT to get if small details r changed. http://t.co/ShAMFrV28Y
Scientific replication isn't so simple. Even the posner & snarc effects r easy NOT to get if small details r changed. http://t.co/ShAMFrV28Y
How NOT to respond to someone failing to replicate your work http://t.co/eKcpuUmh2e
Replication crisis or crisis in replication? A reinterpretation of Shanks et al. http://t.co/JviYSm1VEk
Full text - PLOS ONE: Priming Intelligent Behavior: An Elusive Phenomenon http://t.co/4d3VEha9uC
... And how to respond well to someone's poor response http://t.co/Umj8yLoUcF
How NOT to respond to someone failing to replicate your work http://t.co/eKcpuUmh2e
@Rijnvis Jawel dus. Maar hoe verdedig je je tegen snelle conclusies? http://t.co/XNUXVpuviW
@clijng Vond zelf zijn verdediging wel goed, maar teveel gericht op inhoud, terwijl t probleem ook pr is.. http://t.co/XNUXVpuviW
A teaching moment for my methods paper:"@ProfAndyField: How NOT to respond to someone failing to replicate your work http://t.co/tjjtAMOO78"
... And how to respond well to someone's poor response http://t.co/Umj8yLoUcF
How NOT to respond to someone failing to replicate your work http://t.co/eKcpuUmh2e
How NOT to respond to someone failing to replicate your work http://t.co/eKcpuUmh2e
... And how to respond well to someone's poor response http://t.co/Umj8yLoUcF
How NOT to respond to someone failing to replicate your work http://t.co/eKcpuUmh2e
... And how to respond well to someone's poor response http://t.co/Umj8yLoUcF
How NOT to respond to someone failing to replicate your work http://t.co/eKcpuUmh2e
@ProfAndyField @vinwalsh @social_brains Seriously; see the author's reply, they were unimpressed as well http://t.co/b0nhoYkkXs
... And how to respond well to someone's poor response http://t.co/Umj8yLoUcF
How NOT to respond to someone failing to replicate your work http://t.co/eKcpuUmh2e
Priming Intelligent Behavior: An Elusive Phenomenon http://t.co/OJFfn3FMuq cc @lejonidegran @androt
Good response. “@social_brains: Djiksterhuis replies to claims his social priming studies don't replicate http://t.co/ShAMFrV28Y”
Scientific replication isn't so simple. Even the posner & snarc effects r easy NOT to get if small details r changed. http://t.co/ShAMFrV28Y
@lakens @MBrandt05 Ugh. So misinformed. I have healthy skepticism about my field, but I totally agree w/ AD here: http://t.co/c0tmz00p8L
Djiksterhuis replies to claims his social priming studies don't replicate http://t.co/cvJQu38P71
@hpashler Ap Dijksterhuis‘ comments on the PLoS ONE paper: http://t.co/SJnfhnJ6Ti
Djiksterhuis replies to claims his social priming studies don't replicate http://t.co/cvJQu38P71
"This debate is open to external contributions": PLOS ONE editor Jean Daunizeau on Shanks' priming replication study http://t.co/MT0RWWaxJX
PLoS ONE editor responds to debate between professors on professor-prime-effect-replication-failure: Yes, debate=good http://t.co/fjV49WEuu3
PLoS ONE editor responds to debate between professors on professor-prime-effect-replication-failure: Yes, debate=good http://t.co/fjV49WEuu3
PLOS ONE editor Jean Daunizeau on the Shanks' priming replication study http://t.co/ydfE89UPDO … via @mattjhodgkinson
PLOS ONE editor Jean Daunizeau on the Shanks' priming replication study http://t.co/ydfE89UPDO … via @mattjhodgkinson
#PLOSONE: Priming Intelligent Behavior: An Elusive Phenomenon http://t.co/BHRvVijazn
PLOS ONE editor Jean Daunizeau on the Shanks' priming replication study http://t.co/ydfE89UPDO … via @mattjhodgkinson
PLOS ONE editor Jean Daunizeau on the Shanks' priming replication study http://t.co/ydfE89UPDO … via@mattjhodgkinson