@syeducation Interesting stuff! Reminds me of this paper: https://t.co/PtUX1H58Yi
@leightjessica Might already know these but just in case: 1. https://t.co/2cdI2EUCep 2. https://t.co/0rbdsc8d9r 3. https://t.co/BKiLqGjKAu 4. https://t.co/1nVPS7x5ks 5. https://t.co/hG82R2CfPb (There's a few RCTs on null results too, let me know if need r
RT @chrisdc77: @lisadebruine @maltoesermalte This is likely. Even in clinical trials where preregistration is SOP, 2 out of 3 reviewers don…
@lisadebruine @maltoesermalte This is likely. Even in clinical trials where preregistration is SOP, 2 out of 3 reviewers don’t read the protocols supporting completed studies. I’m sure that rate is even higher in psychology https://t.co/AEESrGlpcL
@RogertheGS @maltoesermalte @jpsimmon @pdakean @dstephenlindsay @uri_sohn It also increases burden on revwrs to compare manuscript w/ protocol. In medicine 2/3rds of revwrs don't bother. https://t.co/AEESrGlpcL
@adamgdunn Indeed. This study found that only 34% of revs checked protocol. https://t.co/ApK1k8YDaB RR overcomes inconvenience b/c protocol in built.
RT @chrisdc77: @hardsci @schotz And see https://t.co/AEESrGlpcL Just 1 in 3 reviewers even check the protocol
@hardsci @schotz And see https://t.co/AEESrGlpcL Just 1 in 3 reviewers even check the protocol
@MarcusMunafo @StuartJRitchie @edyong209 Even though 2/3rds of reviewers/editors don't (!) http://t.co/0cqhAUjOHm
#PLOS: Use of Trial Register Information during the Peer Review Process http://t.co/XY0rTIWJTg #ethics #tghn http://t.co/DjQgQfD51p
Warned! (Some) peer reviewers recommend rejection if manuscript is inconsistent with trial registry info http://t.co/b0X9O8mh2y
Warned: (Some) peer reviewers recommend rejection if manscript is inconsistent with registry info http://t.co/b0X9O8mh2y
Only 1/3 of peer reviewers of randomized controlled trials check the trial registration details http://t.co/K4cTyUeXOh #peerreview
Only 1/3 of peer reviewers of randomized controlled trials check the trial registration details http://t.co/K4cTyUeXOh #peerreview
Only 1/3 of peer reviewers of randomized controlled trials check the trial registration details http://t.co/K4cTyUeXOh #peerreview
Only 1/3 of peer reviewers of randomized controlled trials check the trial registration details http://t.co/K4cTyUeXOh #peerreview
Only 1/3 of peer reviewers of randomized controlled trials check the trial registration details http://t.co/K4cTyUeXOh #peerreview
Only 1/3 of peer reviewers of randomized controlled trials check the trial registration details http://t.co/K4cTyUeXOh #peerreview
Most refs don't check trial registration (http://t.co/K4cTyUeXOh), but PLOS ONE staff check registration & protocol http://t.co/3C6wYDdtqL
Facepalm: Only 1/3 of peer reviewers of RCTs compare trial registration details to manuscript http://t.co/cGrhslIco9 via @mattjhodgkinson
Only 1/3 of peer reviewers of randomized controlled trials check the trial registration details http://t.co/K4cTyUeXOh #peerreview
Facepalm: Only 1/3 of peer reviewers of RCTs compare trial registration details to manuscript http://t.co/cGrhslIco9 via @mattjhodgkinson
Most refs don't check trial registration (http://t.co/K4cTyUeXOh), but PLOS ONE staff check registration & protocol http://t.co/3C6wYDdtqL
Most refs don't check trial registration (http://t.co/K4cTyUeXOh), but PLOS ONE staff check registration & protocol http://t.co/3C6wYDdtqL
Only 1/3 of peer reviewers of randomized controlled trials check the trial registration details http://t.co/K4cTyUeXOh #peerreview
Only 1/3 of peer reviewers of randomized controlled trials check the trial registration details http://t.co/K4cTyUeXOh #peerreview
Only 1/3 of #PeerReviewers surveyed examined registered #ClinialTrial & reported discrepancies to Journal #Editors http://t.co/jiQA3O8896
Only 1/3 of #PeerReviewers surveyed examined registered #ClinialTrial & reported discrepancies to Journal #Editors http://t.co/jiQA3O8896
new @plosone paper: 1/3 jnl reviewers surveyed looked at trial registry info and reported discrepancies to editors http://t.co/rzyF1PJH82
Only 1/3 of reviewers examined registered trial information & reported discrepancies to journal editors http://t.co/YYcWiCvqBH via @PLOSONE
new @plosone paper: 1/3 jnl reviewers surveyed looked at trial registry info and reported discrepancies to editors http://t.co/rzyF1PJH82
Only 1/3 of reviewers check that clinical trial info in ms matches registry: http://t.co/FGMxHV1e9d via @plosone @veitchemma HT @sharmanedit