Title |
Vertebrate DNA in Fecal Samples from Bonobos and Gorillas: Evidence for Meat Consumption or Artefact?
|
---|---|
Published in |
PLOS ONE, February 2010
|
DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0009419 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Michael Hofreiter, Eva Kreuz, Jonas Eriksson, Grit Schubert, Gottfried Hohmann |
Abstract |
Deciphering the behavioral repertoire of great apes is a challenge for several reasons. First, due to their elusive behavior in dense forest environments, great ape populations are often difficult to observe. Second, members of the genus Pan are known to display a great variety in their behavioral repertoire; thus, observations from one population are not necessarily representative for other populations. For example, bonobos (Pan paniscus) are generally believed to consume almost no vertebrate prey. However, recent observations show that at least some bonobo populations may consume vertebrate prey more commonly than previously believed. We investigated the extent of their meat consumption using PCR amplification of vertebrate mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) segments from DNA extracted from bonobo feces. As a control we also attempted PCR amplifications from gorilla feces, a species assumed to be strictly herbivorous. |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 2 | 18% |
United Kingdom | 1 | 9% |
Australia | 1 | 9% |
Belgium | 1 | 9% |
Brazil | 1 | 9% |
Unknown | 5 | 45% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 9 | 82% |
Scientists | 2 | 18% |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 3 | 3% |
Brazil | 2 | 2% |
Japan | 2 | 2% |
South Africa | 1 | <1% |
Belgium | 1 | <1% |
Australia | 1 | <1% |
Finland | 1 | <1% |
Romania | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 100 | 89% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 26 | 23% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 20 | 18% |
Student > Master | 14 | 13% |
Professor | 13 | 12% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 10 | 9% |
Other | 21 | 19% |
Unknown | 8 | 7% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 55 | 49% |
Psychology | 12 | 11% |
Environmental Science | 9 | 8% |
Social Sciences | 5 | 4% |
Business, Management and Accounting | 4 | 4% |
Other | 13 | 12% |
Unknown | 14 | 13% |