RT @NiranjanAjit: 2/ they get googlable facts wrong. the claim that all fisheries will collapse by 2048 is dumb misinformation. they cite…
2/ they get googlable facts wrong. the claim that all fisheries will collapse by 2048 is dumb misinformation. they cite a headline *from 2006* based on a projection the study authors no longer use and that scientists have rebutted for more than a decade
@DrashyaGoel @KBoerder It's a fabulous paper. I did a bit of an analysis on citations of it a few years later. https://t.co/DHl1JCOsfl
RT @BlahaFrancisco: Really? check your sources @stuff "the entire fishing industry will have collapsed by 2050, with the world's commercial…
Really? check your sources @stuff "the entire fishing industry will have collapsed by 2050, with the world's commercial fish stocks either extinct, or needing generations to recover" that statement was retracted by the original paper authors in 2006! https
RT @waiterich: Hi @businessinsider, this contains a couple misleading 🐟 stats: ~34% of fisheries are overfished (bad), but ~60% are at max…
RT @waiterich: Hi @businessinsider, this contains a couple misleading 🐟 stats: ~34% of fisheries are overfished (bad), but ~60% are at max…
RT @waiterich: Hi @businessinsider, this contains a couple misleading 🐟 stats: ~34% of fisheries are overfished (bad), but ~60% are at max…
RT @waiterich: Hi @businessinsider, this contains a couple misleading 🐟 stats: ~34% of fisheries are overfished (bad), but ~60% are at max…
RT @waiterich: Hi @businessinsider, this contains a couple misleading 🐟 stats: ~34% of fisheries are overfished (bad), but ~60% are at max…
RT @TrevorABranch: @businessinsider "experts say global fisheries could collapse by 2048" This has been debunked by a host of rebuttals, an…
RT @waiterich: Hi @businessinsider, this contains a couple misleading 🐟 stats: ~34% of fisheries are overfished (bad), but ~60% are at max…
RT @waiterich: Hi @businessinsider, this contains a couple misleading 🐟 stats: ~34% of fisheries are overfished (bad), but ~60% are at max…
RT @waiterich: Hi @businessinsider, this contains a couple misleading 🐟 stats: ~34% of fisheries are overfished (bad), but ~60% are at max…
RT @waiterich: Hi @businessinsider, this contains a couple misleading 🐟 stats: ~34% of fisheries are overfished (bad), but ~60% are at max…
RT @waiterich: Hi @businessinsider, this contains a couple misleading 🐟 stats: ~34% of fisheries are overfished (bad), but ~60% are at max…
RT @waiterich: Hi @businessinsider, this contains a couple misleading 🐟 stats: ~34% of fisheries are overfished (bad), but ~60% are at max…
RT @waiterich: Hi @businessinsider, this contains a couple misleading 🐟 stats: ~34% of fisheries are overfished (bad), but ~60% are at max…
RT @waiterich: Hi @businessinsider, this contains a couple misleading 🐟 stats: ~34% of fisheries are overfished (bad), but ~60% are at max…
RT @TrevorABranch: @businessinsider "experts say global fisheries could collapse by 2048" This has been debunked by a host of rebuttals, an…
RT @waiterich: Hi @businessinsider, this contains a couple misleading 🐟 stats: ~34% of fisheries are overfished (bad), but ~60% are at max…
RT @waiterich: Hi @businessinsider, this contains a couple misleading 🐟 stats: ~34% of fisheries are overfished (bad), but ~60% are at max…
Hi @businessinsider, this contains a couple misleading 🐟 stats: ~34% of fisheries are overfished (bad), but ~60% are at maximum sustainable capacity (good): https://t.co/GhgsuJ58na “Fisheries collapse by 2048” is a 2006 projection that has been refuted:
RT @TrevorABranch: @businessinsider "experts say global fisheries could collapse by 2048" This has been debunked by a host of rebuttals, an…
RT @TrevorABranch: @businessinsider "experts say global fisheries could collapse by 2048" This has been debunked by a host of rebuttals, an…
@businessinsider "experts say global fisheries could collapse by 2048" This has been debunked by a host of rebuttals, and the original authors no longer believe in it anymore. https://t.co/DHl1JCOsfl
RT @j_wilson_white: @MiriamGoldste @anthonomics here is one from a scientific literature angle (not scicomm) https://t.co/FlAkaBNyhy by @Tr…
@MiriamGoldste @anthonomics here is one from a scientific literature angle (not scicomm) https://t.co/FlAkaBNyhy by @TrevorABranch
RT @timonroad: Statements that provoke confirmation bias are difficult to debate. @hilbornr had a go. @spc_cps had a go, John Sibert had a…
RT @timonroad: Statements that provoke confirmation bias are difficult to debate. @hilbornr had a go. @spc_cps had a go, John Sibert had a…
@sdnjohnson @nicjohnston92 @Jammersblog @Wikisteff WaPo has retracted statement about saltwater fish from that piece. Further info on source used here https://t.co/UlMhwbT10k
RT @timonroad: Statements that provoke confirmation bias are difficult to debate. @hilbornr had a go. @spc_cps had a go, John Sibert had a…
RT @timonroad: Statements that provoke confirmation bias are difficult to debate. @hilbornr had a go. @spc_cps had a go, John Sibert had a…
RT @TrevorABranch: @manjusrii The 2048 prediction for all saltwater fish being gone, is not cited by the original authors, e.g. here is my…
@manjusrii The 2048 prediction for all saltwater fish being gone, is not cited by the original authors, e.g. here is my published analysis https://t.co/VM7Ur1xnSd Please update/remove. Happy to chat on the phone more.
RT @timonroad: Statements that provoke confirmation bias are difficult to debate. @hilbornr had a go. @spc_cps had a go, John Sibert had a…
RT @timonroad: Statements that provoke confirmation bias are difficult to debate. @hilbornr had a go. @spc_cps had a go, John Sibert had a…
Statements that provoke confirmation bias are difficult to debate. @hilbornr had a go. @spc_cps had a go, John Sibert had a go (https://t.co/luumQv8mBO), and @TrevorABranch had a go (https://t.co/c9rGGRjNgL), but 2048 is still fixed in the popular imagina
@RebeccaRHelm @markberman @PlanetDr This study: https://t.co/viG3I5ROvi Actually became a case study in shitty feedback btw sci-journals and trad-media, lol: https://t.co/T5nHVD2rSB
@MichelMikuLover @TyraTheTaurus @_Omniscient69 Yes we do but it has been refuted many times. Good discussion in this paper https://t.co/Q9LZPkc679
@mbond_esq Peer reviewed but refuted many times including by the original authors. Good run down here https://t.co/Q9LZPkc679
RT @LetsFishSmarter: @janeaadey .@janeaadey - You know I'm not one to brush aside conservation concerns lightly, but the 2048 figure has be…
RT @LetsFishSmarter: @janeaadey .@janeaadey - You know I'm not one to brush aside conservation concerns lightly, but the 2048 figure has be…
RT @LetsFishSmarter: @janeaadey .@janeaadey - You know I'm not one to brush aside conservation concerns lightly, but the 2048 figure has be…
RT @LetsFishSmarter: @janeaadey .@janeaadey - You know I'm not one to brush aside conservation concerns lightly, but the 2048 figure has be…
RT @LetsFishSmarter: @janeaadey .@janeaadey - You know I'm not one to brush aside conservation concerns lightly, but the 2048 figure has be…
RT @TrevorABranch: @theimpactbible The 2048 prediction is not cited by the original authors https://t.co/3yDiRmHvo3 And more here: https://…
@theimpactbible The 2048 prediction is not cited by the original authors https://t.co/3yDiRmHvo3 And more here: https://t.co/EO0jsxPPwq Please correct.
@MelissaBreyer and here is a paper I wrote showing that the authors of that prediction stopped talking about it https://t.co/3yDiRmHvo3
@gkalinkat @GlennInwoodNZ @chris_harrod less informed: fields far from paper, papers with one author, e.g. here: https://t.co/3yDiRmHvo3
RT @TrevorABranch: The authors of the prediction that all fisheries will be collapsed by 2048 have moved on, so should the media. https://t…
RT @guyyeomans: I'd used 2048 forecast in a previous #endofbluefrontier scenario: reminder we should monitor/re-evaluate statements on chan…
RT @TrevorABranch: The authors of the prediction that all fisheries will be collapsed by 2048 have moved on, so should the media. https://t…
RT @TrevorABranch: The authors of the prediction that all fisheries will be collapsed by 2048 have moved on, so should the media. https://t…
RT @TrevorABranch: The authors of the prediction that all fisheries will be collapsed by 2048 have moved on, so should the media. https://t…
I'd used 2048 forecast in a previous #endofbluefrontier scenario: reminder we should monitor/re-evaluate statements on change/future-states https://t.co/YXQ64pdbrU
RT @TrevorABranch: The authors of the prediction that all fisheries will be collapsed by 2048 have moved on, so should the media. https://t…
RT @TrevorABranch: The authors of the prediction that all fisheries will be collapsed by 2048 have moved on, so should the media. https://t…
RT @TrevorABranch: The authors of the prediction that all fisheries will be collapsed by 2048 have moved on, so should the media. https://t…
RT @TrevorABranch: The authors of the prediction that all fisheries will be collapsed by 2048 have moved on, so should the media. https://t…
RT @TrevorABranch: The authors of the prediction that all fisheries will be collapsed by 2048 have moved on, so should the media. https://t…
RT @TrevorABranch: The authors of the prediction that all fisheries will be collapsed by 2048 have moved on, so should the media. https://t…
RT @TrevorABranch: The authors of the prediction that all fisheries will be collapsed by 2048 have moved on, so should the media. https://t…
RT @TrevorABranch: The authors of the prediction that all fisheries will be collapsed by 2048 have moved on, so should the media. https://t…
RT @TrevorABranch: The authors of the prediction that all fisheries will be collapsed by 2048 have moved on, so should the media. https://t…
Mojoshark: RT TrevorABranch: The authors of the prediction that all fisheries will be collapsed by 2048 have moved… https://t.co/h6jWYLcmas
RT @TrevorABranch: The authors of the prediction that all fisheries will be collapsed by 2048 have moved on, so should the media. https://t…
RT @TrevorABranch: The authors of the prediction that all fisheries will be collapsed by 2048 have moved on, so should the media. https://t…
RT @TrevorABranch: The authors of the prediction that all fisheries will be collapsed by 2048 have moved on, so should the media. https://t…
RT @TrevorABranch: The authors of the prediction that all fisheries will be collapsed by 2048 have moved on, so should the media. https://t…
RT @TrevorABranch: The authors of the prediction that all fisheries will be collapsed by 2048 have moved on, so should the media. https://t…
RT @TrevorABranch: @AldenWicker you should know that the 2048 prediction you reference is not credible. Since 2006 multiple rebuttals https…
@AldenWicker you should know that the 2048 prediction you reference is not credible. Since 2006 multiple rebuttals https://t.co/3yDiRmHvo3
RT @TrevorABranch: The authors of the prediction that all fisheries will be collapsed by 2048 have moved on, so should the media. https://t…
RT @TrevorABranch: The authors of the prediction that all fisheries will be collapsed by 2048 have moved on, so should the media. https://t…
RT @TrevorABranch: The authors of the prediction that all fisheries will be collapsed by 2048 have moved on, so should the media. https://t…
The authors of the prediction that all fisheries will be collapsed by 2048 have moved on, so should the media. https://t.co/3yDiRmHvo3
RT @TrevorABranch: But in 2013 it took 2 weeks during Olympic TV commercial breaks to get all 664 pdfs I needed https://t.co/rDfZUk2uC7 htt…
But in 2013 it took 2 weeks during Olympic TV commercial breaks to get all 664 pdfs I needed https://t.co/rDfZUk2uC7 https://t.co/pyU5gwL8YV
@sebpardo well that particular result has been cited about 70 times, nearly all accepting the result: http://t.co/3yDiRmHvo3
@elephantjournal that "collapse by 2048" is an innapropriate extrapolation hyped up by the media @LuisCubillos http://t.co/XgF4G9q1mk
out of 55 times original authors cite the 2006 pap, they mention 2048 prediction once http://t.co/AWRynwzTwj http://t.co/jKLsDjyKQK
.@cliffweathers out of the 55 times the original authors cite the 2006 paper, they mention the 2048 prediction once http://t.co/8oZFd5kKCl
.@cliffweathers out of the 55 times the original authors cite the 2006 paper, they mention the 2048 prediction once http://t.co/8oZFd5kKCl
.@RockyRohde this is the best one: http://t.co/icKzgnjklB "numerous rebuttals, original authors no longer refer to 2048 prediction"
.@billmaher the projection that all fish will be collapsed by 2048 is controversial: the authors don't mention it http://t.co/XZB0bFew5l
.@HeatherKoldewey the Worm et al. 2009 paper should replace the 2048 prediction that even those authors don't cite: http://t.co/O1gdtM15h0
.@HeatherKoldewey the Worm et al. 2009 paper should replace the 2048 prediction that even those authors don't cite: http://t.co/O1gdtM15h0
.@fishmedicuk @oceansresearch @GOceanC original authors no longer refer to that prediction (all fish gone by 2050) http://t.co/3yDiRmqsm3
My published analysis of all citations of the paper projecting that fisheries will collapse by 2048 @washingtonpost http://t.co/icKzgmKGbx
"...press coverage does influence how papers are cited..." Indeed. http://t.co/cReG2vI0pk
My published analysis of all citations of the paper projecting that fisheries will collapse by 2048 @washingtonpost http://t.co/icKzgmKGbx
My published analysis of all citations of the paper projecting that fisheries will collapse by 2048 @washingtonpost http://t.co/icKzgmKGbx