↓ Skip to main content

PLOS

Defining Body Fatness in Adolescents: A Proposal of the Afad-A Classification

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, February 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
17 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
103 Mendeley
Title
Defining Body Fatness in Adolescents: A Proposal of the Afad-A Classification
Published in
PLOS ONE, February 2013
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0055849
Pubmed ID
Authors

María del Mar Bibiloni, Antoni Pons, Josep A. Tur

Abstract

Body mass index (BMI) shows several limitations as indicator of fatness. Using the International Obesity Task Force (IOTF) reference and the World Health Organization (WHO) standard 2007 on the same dataset yielded widely different rates. At higher levels, BMI and the BMI cut-offs may be help in informing a clinical judgement, but at levels near the norm additional criteria may be needed. This study compares the prevalence of overweight and obesity using IOTF and WHO-2007 references and interprets body composition by comparing measures of BMI and body fatness (fat mass index, FMI; and waist-to-height ratio, WHtR) among an adolescent population.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 103 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Czechia 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Unknown 100 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 21 20%
Student > Master 19 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 9%
Researcher 7 7%
Other 6 6%
Other 20 19%
Unknown 21 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 24 23%
Nursing and Health Professions 15 15%
Sports and Recreations 10 10%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 8%
Unspecified 6 6%
Other 17 17%
Unknown 23 22%