↓ Skip to main content

PLOS

The Effect of Cold Showering on Health and Work: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, September 2016
Altmetric Badge

Citations

dimensions_citation
29 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
240 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
The Effect of Cold Showering on Health and Work: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Published in
PLOS ONE, September 2016
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0161749
Pubmed ID
Authors

Geert A. Buijze, Inger N. Sierevelt, Bas C. J. M. van der Heijden, Marcel G. Dijkgraaf, Monique H. W. Frings-Dresen

Abstract

The aim of this study was to determine the cumulative effect of a routine (hot-to-) cold shower on sickness, quality of life and work productivity. Between January and March 2015, 3018 participants between 18 and 65 years without severe comorbidity and no routine experience of cold showering were randomized (1:1:1:1) to a (hot-to-) cold shower for 30, 60, 90 seconds or a control group during 30 consecutive days followed by 60 days of showering cold at their own discretion for the intervention groups. The primary outcome was illness days and related sickness absence from work. Secondary outcomes were quality of life, work productivity, anxiety, thermal sensation and adverse reactions. 79% of participants in the interventions groups completed the 30 consecutive days protocol. A negative binomial regression model showed a 29% reduction in sickness absence for (hot-to-) cold shower regimen compared to the control group (incident rate ratio: 0.71, P = 0.003). For illness days there was no significant group effect. No related serious advents events were reported. A routine (hot-to-) cold shower resulted in a statistical reduction of self-reported sickness absence but not illness days in adults without severe comorbidity. Netherlands National Trial Register NTR5183.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 646 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 240 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Netherlands 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 238 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 38 16%
Researcher 30 13%
Student > Master 23 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 15 6%
Other 40 17%
Unknown 79 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 47 20%
Psychology 19 8%
Sports and Recreations 18 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 11 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 9 4%
Other 47 20%
Unknown 89 37%