Title |
The Effect of Cold Showering on Health and Work: A Randomized Controlled Trial
|
---|---|
Published in |
PLOS ONE, September 2016
|
DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0161749 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Geert A. Buijze, Inger N. Sierevelt, Bas C. J. M. van der Heijden, Marcel G. Dijkgraaf, Monique H. W. Frings-Dresen |
Abstract |
The aim of this study was to determine the cumulative effect of a routine (hot-to-) cold shower on sickness, quality of life and work productivity. Between January and March 2015, 3018 participants between 18 and 65 years without severe comorbidity and no routine experience of cold showering were randomized (1:1:1:1) to a (hot-to-) cold shower for 30, 60, 90 seconds or a control group during 30 consecutive days followed by 60 days of showering cold at their own discretion for the intervention groups. The primary outcome was illness days and related sickness absence from work. Secondary outcomes were quality of life, work productivity, anxiety, thermal sensation and adverse reactions. 79% of participants in the interventions groups completed the 30 consecutive days protocol. A negative binomial regression model showed a 29% reduction in sickness absence for (hot-to-) cold shower regimen compared to the control group (incident rate ratio: 0.71, P = 0.003). For illness days there was no significant group effect. No related serious advents events were reported. A routine (hot-to-) cold shower resulted in a statistical reduction of self-reported sickness absence but not illness days in adults without severe comorbidity. Netherlands National Trial Register NTR5183. |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 110 | 17% |
United Kingdom | 47 | 7% |
Spain | 28 | 4% |
Australia | 18 | 3% |
Canada | 15 | 2% |
Netherlands | 15 | 2% |
Germany | 12 | 2% |
India | 11 | 2% |
Japan | 10 | 2% |
Other | 63 | 10% |
Unknown | 317 | 49% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 550 | 85% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 44 | 7% |
Scientists | 38 | 6% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 12 | 2% |
Unknown | 2 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
United States | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 238 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Bachelor | 38 | 16% |
Researcher | 30 | 13% |
Student > Master | 23 | 10% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 15 | 6% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 15 | 6% |
Other | 40 | 17% |
Unknown | 79 | 33% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 47 | 20% |
Psychology | 19 | 8% |
Sports and Recreations | 18 | 8% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 11 | 5% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 9 | 4% |
Other | 47 | 20% |
Unknown | 89 | 37% |