@3rdreviewer @iddux @ensembl How about this paper? https://t.co/1MTUFsM59m
Spurred by Nehrt et al's paper, there were several other papers in the following months and years, which more or less had the same message: ortholog conjecture supported, but weakly, and #methodmatter. https://t.co/QpGEvaVaEi https://t.co/ud9ZCHXzzp https:
Interesting orthologs paper (my past scientific life) in PLoS CompBio: http://t.co/Ns90bNApYe
Reading: The Ortholog Conjecture Is Untestable by the Current Gene Ontology but Is Supported by RNA Sequencing Data http://t.co/f5vGdmpa
The Ortholog Conjecture Is Untestable by the Current Gene #Ontology but Is Supported by RNA Sequencing Data http://t.co/ETf2bfsf
RT @toni_gabaldon: More support for the orthology conjecture #PLOSCompBio http://t.co/aCHoQ7YH … confirming...
More support for the orthology conjecture #PLOSCompBio http://t.co/sPzBVnjo confirming our earlier findings on dif data http://t.co/LKOPec9W
#PLOSCompBio: The Ortholog Conjecture Is Untestable by the Current Gene Ontology but Is S... http://t.co/sPzBVnjo
RT @iddux: Ortholog Conjecture debate continues @PLOSCompBiol: RNA-Seq data support the OC: http://t.co/LcQE5Nj5
RT @iddux: Ortholog Conjecture debate continues @PLOSCompBiol: RNA-Seq data support the OC: http://t.co/LcQE5Nj5
Ortholog Conjecture debate continues @PLOSCompBiol: RNA-Seq data support the OC: http://t.co/LcQE5Nj5
The Ortholog Conjecture Is Untestable by the Current Gene Ontology but Is Supported by RNA Sequencing Data http://t.co/k74syHqV PLoS CompBio
The Ortholog Conjecture Is Untestable by Current Gene Ontology but Is Supported by RNA-Seq Data http://t.co/uT1EGa2F via @ploscompbiol #noGO
RT @marc_rr: Discussion of the #ortholog conjecture continues, with a very nice paper by Chen & Zhang: http://t.co/Gnyp1gLN #bioinformatics #RNAseq
RT @marc_rr: Discussion of the #ortholog conjecture continues, with a very nice paper by Chen & Zhang: http://t.co/Gnyp1gLN #bioinformatics #RNAseq
MT #ortholog conjecture http://t.co/ofxX8IY0 … genes annotated only by computational prediction. N.b latest TrEMBL:Swiss-Prot is 52.7
@nickschurch on the functional differences between orthologues and paralogues http://t.co/akkUSrD6 #bioinformatics #RNAseq
RT @marc_rr: Discussion of the #ortholog conjecture continues, with a very nice paper by Chen & Zhang: http://t.co/Gnyp1gLN #bioinformatics #RNAseq
RT @marc_rr: Discussion of the #ortholog conjecture continues, with a very nice paper by Chen & Zhang: http://t.co/Gnyp1gLN #bioinformatics #RNAseq
Discussion of the #ortholog conjecture continues, with a very nice paper by Chen & Zhang: http://t.co/Gnyp1gLN #bioinformatics #RNAseq
Ortholog Conjecture Is Untestable using Gene Ontology but Is Supported by #RNASeq Data = #FurtherJustification @ http://t.co/wMNU6fjs
The Ortholog Conjecture Is Untestable by the Current Gene Ontology but Is Supported by RNA Sequencing Data http://t.co/OrBxi9ge
The Ortholog Conjecture Is Untestable by the Current Gene Ontology but Is Supported by #RNA Sequencing Data http://t.co/HG5r1bPI #PLoS @MyEN
The Ortholog Conjecture: http://t.co/fPHmxBQI Sounds a lot like an episode of The Big Bang Theory.