PLOS ONE: How Many Scientists Fabricate and Falsify Research? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Survey Data http://t.co/WCw7wRUOhv
PLOS ONE: How Many Scientists Fabricate and Falsify Research? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Survey Data http://t.co/WCw7wRUOhv
PLOS ONE: How Many Scientists Fabricate and Falsify Research? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Survey Data http://t.co/afjaQTkbEw
PLOS ONE: How Many Scientists Fabricate and Falsify Research? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Survey Data http://t.co/fEuPq6lh7A
How Many #Scientists #Fabricate and #Falsify #Research? http://t.co/d9wxvux5ZV
A must-read 2009 article by Daniele Fanelli (Cnr) on research misconduct in @PLOSONE http://t.co/bRGWez1W7z
😨😲1.97% have fabricated data or results at least once a serious form of misconduct by any standard--and up to 33.7% http://t.co/UUOLXMRqTL
@ZackBergerMDPhD Fanelli has done the best work on this: http://t.co/GhJIePE67c and there have been updates http://t.co/ReckdsoUTv
@ZackBergerMDPhD Fanelli has done the best work on this: http://t.co/GhJIePE67c and there have been updates http://t.co/ReckdsoUTv
Danke sehr! Ich kann http://t.co/KsLDv1dGl0 und http://t.co/YgavNflVmi empfehlen @Metoeken @helmholtz_de
研究者の約2%は研究不正をしたことがあるいう研究がある。http://t.co/IDqqCR4dmO この2%は不正をした人の中でも正直なほうの人 or 不正という認識がある人。不正をする人は普通隠すか、不正の認識すらないだろうので実際にはこの倍以上(5%くらい?)はいるのでは。
研究者の約2%は研究不正をしたことがあるいう研究がある。http://t.co/IDqqCR4dmO この2%は不正をした人の中でも正直なほうの人 or 不正という認識がある人。不正をする人は普通隠すか、不正の認識すらないだろうので実際にはこの倍以上(5%くらい?)はいるのでは。
研究者の約2%は研究不正をしたことがあるいう研究がある。http://t.co/IDqqCR4dmO この2%は不正をした人の中でも正直なほうの人 or 不正という認識がある人。不正をする人は普通隠すか、不正の認識すらないだろうので実際にはこの倍以上(5%くらい?)はいるのでは。
研究者の約2%は研究不正をしたことがあるいう研究がある。http://t.co/IDqqCR4dmO この2%は不正をした人の中でも正直なほうの人 or 不正という認識がある人。不正をする人は普通隠すか、不正の認識すらないだろうので実際にはこの倍以上(5%くらい?)はいるのでは。
研究者の約2%は研究不正をしたことがあるいう研究がある。http://t.co/IDqqCR4dmO この2%は不正をした人の中でも正直なほうの人 or 不正という認識がある人。不正をする人は普通隠すか、不正の認識すらないだろうので実際にはこの倍以上(5%くらい?)はいるのでは。
研究者の約2%は研究不正をしたことがあるいう研究がある。http://t.co/IDqqCR4dmO この2%は不正をした人の中でも正直なほうの人 or 不正という認識がある人。不正をする人は普通隠すか、不正の認識すらないだろうので実際にはこの倍以上(5%くらい?)はいるのでは。
Scientific study shows that scientists lie in scientific studies: "A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Survey" http://t.co/jzymPqun3n
PLOS ONE: How Many Scientists Fabricate and Falsify Research? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Survey Data - http://t.co/XJPzQe6sdS
How Many Scientists Fabricate and Falsify Research? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Survey Data http://t.co/TLJDw6kKoc
@michaelwaskom @johnmyleswhite 2% of scientists *admit* fabricating data; if you ask colleagues, 14% implicated. http://t.co/ZFqucOesKF
@michaelwaskom @johnmyleswhite 2% of scientists *admit* fabricating data; if you ask colleagues, 14% implicated. http://t.co/ZFqucOesKF
@FWOVlaanderen Zo zeker dat #fraude (ook grijze zone? http://t.co/oQJYwKRMNa) zeldzaam is? Weinig detectie. (p. 23) http://t.co/D8N8Tz4AEl
How Many Scientists Fabricate and Falsify Research? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Survey Data http://t.co/ZZ6uFhFNCM
How Many Scientists Fabricate and Falsify Research? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Survey Data http://t.co/f0TprZUapX "#science"
@FintanOToolbox is "peer review" the gold standard? http://t.co/pigg6mfIlx and http://t.co/SONKm5DiIg
How Many #Scientists Fabricate and Falsify #Research? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis: http://t.co/pq1y113LRC @plosone #psychology
How Many Scientists Fabricate and Falsify Research? A Systematic Review http://t.co/Auv5fT5Wvx
How Many Scientists Fabricate and Falsify Research? A Systematic Review http://t.co/Auv5fT5Wvx
@McDawg @dkavanagh #ape2014 Surveys of research misconduct suggest quite a few, eg http://t.co/yn4qyUkeX3
How Many Scientists Fabricate and Falsify Research? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Survey Data http://t.co/yXsj4q0Pu8 @PLOSONE
How Many Scientists Fabricate and Falsify Research? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Survey Data http://t.co/yXsj4q0Pu8 @PLOSONE
How Many Scientists Fabricate and Falsify Research? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Survey Data http://t.co/yXsj4q0Pu8 @PLOSONE
PLOS ONE: How Many Scientists Fabricate and Falsify Research? A Systematic Review and... http://t.co/sP0amrAFWt
How Many Scientists Fabricate and Falsify Research? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Survey Data... http://t.co/zt8RXR4ckm
How Many Scientists Fabricate and Falsify Research? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Survey Data... http://t.co/zt8RXR4ckm
How Many Scientists Fabricate and Falsify Research? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Survey Data... http://t.co/zt8RXR4ckm
Link to Fanelli meta-analysis How Many Scientists Fabricate and Falsify Research? #solo13fraud http://t.co/yn4qyUkeX3
Link to Fanelli meta-analysis How Many Scientists Fabricate and Falsify Research? #solo13fraud http://t.co/yn4qyUkeX3
Reading this http://t.co/x5GaSCHRNP I doubt that any science/research-field can claim that there are no crap-publications.
#PLOSONE: How Many Scientists Fabricate and Falsify Research? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Survey Data http://t.co/qb37aDHxhF
from 2009 #PLOSONE How Many Scientists Fabricate & Falsify Research? Systematic Review & Meta-Analysis of Survey Data http://t.co/phNtD4HA4O
from 2009 #PLOSONE How Many Scientists Fabricate & Falsify Research? Systematic Review & Meta-Analysis of Survey Data http://t.co/phNtD4HA4O
from 2009 #PLOSONE How Many Scientists Fabricate & Falsify Research? Systematic Review & Meta-Analysis of Survey Data http://t.co/phNtD4HA4O
#grccadd @elizabethiorns of @scienceexchange talks abt #science #reproducibility on a larger scale. I plan on reading http://t.co/1jNE1f6Hl0
manipulation/falsification/alterationの3つはこの中にもhttp://t.co/tdiRhpticc
Always worth a read: systematic review of the extent of #researchmisconduct in @PLOSONE http://t.co/DfT0vo46rZ
This is shockingly not-surprising 1in3 #scientists admitted "questionable #research practices" http://t.co/xlUkNHpvyz @PLOS #Science #ethics
% fraud matches almost exactly the one here: http://t.co/ST2QvC5kPe RT @Keith_Laws Scientific Fraud Busting Out http://t.co/phH0gFKXJD
Systematic review of extent of #researchmisconduct, alarming results http://t.co/jJ9ARu4t5e
dodgy tweaking of results does happen but not frequently, apparently http://t.co/jr07fNGGet “Mohammed Ali effect" was a nice reference
Systematic review of extent of #researchmisconduct, alarming results http://t.co/jJ9ARu4t5e
Systematic review of extent of #researchmisconduct, alarming results http://t.co/jJ9ARu4t5e
#PLOSONE: How Many Scientists Fabricate and Falsify Research? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Survey Data http://t.co/Xlfiok5bLV
#PLOSONE: How Many Scientists Fabricate and Falsify Research? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Survey Data http://t.co/Xlfiok5bLV
#PLOSONE: How Many Scientists Fabricate and Falsify Research? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Survey Data http://t.co/Xlfiok5bLV
1 in 50 scientists admits fabricating, falsifying or modifying data/results, 1 in 3 "other questionable practices" http://t.co/wsMgO3FWAw
@ericrumsey Re Watson: Yet given the prevalence of fraud & deception in current medical/pharmaceutical research... http://t.co/qUgsOUuh
How Many Scientists Fabricate and Falsify Research? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis http://t.co/Bn8Mv2MF
2% of scientists admit to have #falsified research and up to 34% admit other questionable research practices http://t.co/TkwIrO4I
"about 2% of scientists admitted to have fabricated, falsified or modified data or results at least once" http://t.co/r7vmU19O
something i just came across and want to read later from @PLOSONE: http://t.co/QOUmpXsP
Tho on that note, 2009 PLOS paper on rates of science falsification. Wonder if we've degenerated further. http://t.co/HbBb6oY3
Tho on that note, 2009 PLOS paper on rates of science falsification. Wonder if we've degenerated further. http://t.co/HbBb6oY3
#PLOSONE: How Many Scientists Fabricate and Falsify Research? A Systematic Review and Me... http://t.co/YJlmQ1ky
@KamounLab #PLOSONE: How Many Scientists Fabricate and Falsify Research? A Systematic Review and Me... http://t.co/sbxp90xb
#PLOSONE: How Many Scientists Fabricate and Falsify Research? A Systematic Review and Me... http://t.co/sbxp90xb
"Bilim insanlarının %2'si, en az bir kez verilerini/deney sonuçlarını etik olmayan şekilde değiştirdiğini kabul ediyor" http://t.co/AcnlSUHQ
"Bilim insanlarının %2'si, en az bir kez verilerini/deney sonuçlarını etik olmayan şekilde değiştirdiğini kabul ediyor" http://t.co/AcnlSUHQ
"Bilim insanlarının %2'si, en az bir kez verilerini/deney sonuçlarını etik olmayan şekilde değiştirdiğini kabul ediyor" http://t.co/AcnlSUHQ
"Bilim insanlarının %2'si, en az bir kez verilerini/deney sonuçlarını etik olmayan şekilde değiştirdiğini kabul ediyor" http://t.co/AcnlSUHQ
How Many Scientists Fabricate and Falsify Research? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Survey Data http://t.co/l4Hv6yYF
Solo el 2% de los científicos reconoce que ha manipulado sus trabajos, pero un 14% afirma conocer a un colega tramposo. http://t.co/r5ezP9WF
RT @TapasDeCiencia: Solo el 2% de los científicos reconoce que ha manipulado sus trabajos, pero un 14% afirma conocer a un colega tramposo. http://t.co/r5ezP9WF
Solo el 2% de los científicos reconoce que ha manipulado sus trabajos, pero un 14% afirma conocer a un colega tramposo. http://t.co/r5ezP9WF
Solo el 2% de los científicos reconoce que ha manipulado sus trabajos, pero un 14% afirma conocer a un colega tramposo. http://t.co/r5ezP9WF
Solo el 2% de los científicos reconoce que ha manipulado sus trabajos, pero un 14% afirma conocer a un colega tramposo. http://t.co/0Aap18Of
Solo el 2% de los científicos reconoce que ha manipulado sus trabajos, pero un 14% afirma conocer a un colega tramposo. http://t.co/r5ezP9WF
Solo el 2% de los científicos reconoce que ha manipulado sus trabajos, pero un 14% afirma conocer a un colega tramposo. http://t.co/r5ezP9WF
Solo el 2% de los científicos reconoce que ha manipulado sus trabajos, pero un 14% afirma conocer a un colega tramposo. http://t.co/r5ezP9WF
Solo el 2% de los científicos reconoce que ha manipulado sus trabajos, pero un 14% afirma conocer a un colega tramposo. http://t.co/r5ezP9WF
Solo el 2% de los científicos reconoce que ha manipulado sus trabajos, pero un 14% afirma conocer a un colega tramposo. http://t.co/r5ezP9WF
Solo el 2% de los científicos reconoce que ha manipulado sus trabajos, pero un 14% afirma conocer a un colega tramposo. http://t.co/r5ezP9WF
Solo el 2% de los científicos reconoce que ha manipulado sus trabajos, pero un 14% afirma conocer a un colega tramposo. http://t.co/r5ezP9WF
Solo el 2% de los científicos reconoce que ha manipulado sus trabajos, pero un 14% afirma conocer a un colega tramposo. http://t.co/r5ezP9WF
Solo el 2% de los científicos reconoce que ha manipulado sus trabajos, pero un 14% afirma conocer a un colega tramposo. http://t.co/r5ezP9WF
Solo el 2% de los científicos reconoce que ha manipulado sus trabajos, pero un 14% afirma conocer a un colega tramposo. http://t.co/r5ezP9WF
Solo el 2% de los científicos reconoce que ha manipulado sus trabajos, pero un 14% afirma conocer a un colega tramposo. http://t.co/r5ezP9WF
Solo el 2% de los científicos reconoce que ha manipulado sus trabajos, pero un 14% afirma conocer a un colega tramposo. http://t.co/r5ezP9WF
How Many Scientists Fabricate and Falsify Research? A Systematic Review and META Analysis of Survey Data http://t.co/Th6fFjrc
How Many Scientists Fabricate and Falsify Research? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Survey Data http://t.co/SLlyFLkt @PLoSONE
"How many scientists #fabricate / #falsify research? A systematic review and meta-analysis of survey data" by Fanelli ~ http://t.co/zisAWDyr
RT @_metas: 얼마나 많은 연구자들이 기만행위를 할까? http://t.co/3Z0jK2sw 결론적으로 말하자면 꽤 만연해있을 것이라는 것. 자기 동료가 기만행위를 하더라도 이를 적극적으로 공론화하는 경우는 생각보다 드물다는 것. 결론적으로 자주 뒷북을 친다는 것.
RT @_metas: 얼마나 많은 연구자들이 기만행위를 할까? http://t.co/3Z0jK2sw 결론적으로 말하자면 꽤 만연해있을 것이라는 것. 자기 동료가 기만행위를 하더라도 이를 적극적으로 공론화하는 경우는 생각보다 드물다는 것. 결론적 ...
얼마나 많은 연구자들이 기만행위를 할까? http://t.co/3Z0jK2sw 결론적으로 말하자면 꽤 만연해있을 것이라는 것. 자기 동료가 기만행위를 하더라도 이를 적극적으로 공론화하는 경우는 생각보다 드물다는 것. 결론적으로 자주 뒷북을 친다는 것.
#PLoS: How Many Scientists Fabricate and Falsify Research? A Systematic Review and Meta-A... http://t.co/11mDqpH0
How Many Scientists Fabricate and Falsify Research? http://t.co/LeXIM1KC papier de 2009, des plus lus selon Mendeley http://t.co/qsH9Mckj
How Many Scientists Fabricate and Falsify Research? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Survey Data http://t.co/GW3qQLD2 vía @PLoS
@romerovaron Stapel debería asociarse con Hwang Woo-suk. No son los únicos que manipulan datos para alcanzar la gloria http://t.co/GW3qQLD2
#PLoS: How Many Scientists Fabricate and Falsify Research? A Systematic Review and Meta-A... http://t.co/ZLRvMJrL