How Many Scientists Fabricate and Falsify Research? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Survey Data by Daniele Fanelli published in https://t.co/68PxqO9VCa https://t.co/97M6UDDx6V https://t.co/EVWWAoQ7O5
RT @fcmfcs2019: "About 2% of scientists admitted having fabricated, falsified, or modified data or results at least once. Up to 30% admitte…
RT @fcmfcs2019: "About 2% of scientists admitted having fabricated, falsified, or modified data or results at least once. Up to 30% admitte…
RT @fcmfcs2019: "About 2% of scientists admitted having fabricated, falsified, or modified data or results at least once. Up to 30% admitte…
RT @fcmfcs2019: "About 2% of scientists admitted having fabricated, falsified, or modified data or results at least once. Up to 30% admitte…
RT @fcmfcs2019: "About 2% of scientists admitted having fabricated, falsified, or modified data or results at least once. Up to 30% admitte…
RT @fcmfcs2019: "About 2% of scientists admitted having fabricated, falsified, or modified data or results at least once. Up to 30% admitte…
"About 2% of scientists admitted having fabricated, falsified, or modified data or results at least once. Up to 30% admitted changing the design, methodology, or results of a study in response to pressures from a funding source." https://t.co/xQ1RaViSip
RT @Omar53223122: @_Halaby @abdullahadam This article shows 2% of scientists admitted to fabricating information at least once while 32% ad…
Pushing the boundaries of #research reproducibility in scientific studies https://t.co/6hSNLfWhy2
@oakescs @schneiderleonid @martinenserink @sciencecohen Haha, dibs on that word. However, when I googled it, these items popped up, a list and a paper on misconduct: https://t.co/BVNmEooSTl https://t.co/aNDi2sfYs1
#DHPV Don’t be fooled by research as fact. #b17 #naturalmedicine #medicalnews https://t.co/rH8xGm1fQ2 https://t.co/i25Bar0QOx
Human beings lie. This isn’t a surprise. This Meme attempts to paint with a large brush all scientists and all dating methods as fraudulent. An excellent example of lying to promote religious casuistry.... For balance, a paper on “lying” in science. http
Some help researching lying in PRd and NonPRd research... https://t.co/89mtdZsnYT
RT @mostrolenk: How Many Scientists Fabricate and Falsify Research? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Survey Data h/t @GreenPlusAnE…
How Many Scientists Fabricate and Falsify Research? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Survey Data h/t @GreenPlusAnE https://t.co/wvOxSbxM4F
Thanks - I couldn’t find more recent data (xcpt small surveys) any one know newer study?@EASEeditors @C0PE
@pippasmart @LearnedPublish Research referenced by @pippasmart is Daniele Fanelli et al https://t.co/SlACFPa9Qy #ISMTE2019 #publicationethics
RT @stephaniemlee: @knutson_brain Here's a meta-analysis of surveys! "A pooled weighted average of 1.97% of scientists admitted to have fab…
RT @stephaniemlee: @knutson_brain Here's a meta-analysis of surveys! "A pooled weighted average of 1.97% of scientists admitted to have fab…
RT @stephaniemlee: @knutson_brain Here's a meta-analysis of surveys! "A pooled weighted average of 1.97% of scientists admitted to have fab…
@knutson_brain Here's a meta-analysis of surveys! "A pooled weighted average of 1.97% of scientists admitted to have fabricated, falsified or modified data or results at least once...and up to 33.7% admitted other questionable research practices." https://
RT @sallieKP75: Are US flu death figures more PR than science? https://t.co/dQWESTY4UI How Many Scientists Fabricate and Falsify Research?…
Are US flu death figures more PR than science? https://t.co/dQWESTY4UI How Many Scientists Fabricate and Falsify Research? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Survey Data https://t.co/lGNZMZQtON
RT @revniggadaddy: Mah NIggaz: SCIENTISTS FALSIFY AND LIE ABOUT THEIR RESEARCH ON A HUGE SCALE!! This is why we must not Worship these so c…
RT @piersar62: @Marco_blc168 @darioconte66 @Giulianodalcin1 @carlopagliani @fringuello @NonVaccinato I ricercatori in campo medico falsific…
RT @piersar62: @Marco_blc168 @darioconte66 @Giulianodalcin1 @carlopagliani @fringuello @NonVaccinato I ricercatori in campo medico falsific…
RT @sallie_bryant75: Many scientists intentionally fabricate data and falsify scientific research. 👉🏼In one survey, 81% of research train…
Many scientists intentionally fabricate data and falsify scientific research. 👉🏼In one survey, 81% of research trainees in the biomedical sciences were “willing to select, omit or fabricate data to win a grant or publish a paper.” #vaccines https://t.c
@brightstrangely @sciam 1995: https://t.co/CmMsjKsqB6 2008:https://t.co/khhTcLUHtl 2009:https://t.co/RonrYAAgB4 2015: https://t.co/AotcQxyK8u If the papers are peer reviewed properly, the above would never happen before being published.
@EdzardErnst Prof E, I'm so pleased that you're going after scientific misconduct! Not sure that using a waitlist control or pragmatic design qualifies. But here are some clearer, more prevalent and egregious examples harming millions, we should raise awar
Mention that misconduct and questionable practices, self-acknowledged by researchers, are disturbingly common. @DFanDaBiasedMan 6/ https://t.co/dXzTyzs8rx
@clbmo @BicoccAlumni Short but link-rich article. Take eg. https://t.co/aMd9PW1MuJ
RT @A_E_M_N: ¿Cuántos científicos fabrican y falsifican la investigación? Una revisión sistemática y meta-análisis de datos de la encuesta…
RT @A_E_M_N: ¿Cuántos científicos fabrican y falsifican la investigación? Una revisión sistemática y meta-análisis de datos de la encuesta…
RT @A_E_M_N: ¿Cuántos científicos fabrican y falsifican la investigación? Una revisión sistemática y meta-análisis de datos de la encuesta…
@FEMHomeopatas Posted... https://t.co/4c0klsUB4d
RT @A_E_M_N: ¿Cuántos científicos fabrican y falsifican la investigación? Una revisión sistemática y meta-análisis de datos de la encuesta…
RT @A_E_M_N: ¿Cuántos científicos fabrican y falsifican la investigación? Una revisión sistemática y meta-análisis de datos de la encuesta…
RT @A_E_M_N: ¿Cuántos científicos fabrican y falsifican la investigación? Una revisión sistemática y meta-análisis de datos de la encuesta…
RT @A_E_M_N: ¿Cuántos científicos fabrican y falsifican la investigación? Una revisión sistemática y meta-análisis de datos de la encuesta…
RT @SHMatritense: Ya lo decía mi tutor @rafabravo , tú marea los datos que al final saldrá lo que quieras. O decía choricea los datos...no…
RT @A_E_M_N: ¿Cuántos científicos fabrican y falsifican la investigación? Una revisión sistemática y meta-análisis de datos de la encuesta…
Ya lo decía mi tutor @rafabravo , tú marea los datos que al final saldrá lo que quieras. O decía choricea los datos...no lo recuerdo. @OMC_Espana
¿Cuántos científicos fabrican y falsifican la investigación? Una revisión sistemática y meta-análisis de datos de la encuesta #PLOSONE: How Many Scientists Fabricate and Falsify Research? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Survey ... https://t.co/k9Q
RT @AnnoviGiulia: #PLOSONE: How Many Scientists Fabricate and Falsify Research? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Survey ... https:/…
#PLOSONE: How Many Scientists Fabricate and Falsify Research? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Survey ... https://t.co/FY6YYdiWay
@OliBerne @haiech @JulienGossa @julien Je crois que c'est ça : How Many Scientists Fabricate and Falsify Research? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Survey Data https://t.co/eoLkGZskZF
RT @ToWhatEnd1: @jordanbpeterson Be intellectually honest. Scrutinize the range of disciplines, not your favourite targets of derogation an…
@jordanbpeterson Be intellectually honest. Scrutinize the range of disciplines, not your favourite targets of derogation and contempt. Where is the intellectual rigour here in your blessed STEM? https://t.co/KBkppNQmri
but floating magical sky daddies.. that’s totes real huh
RT @sandboxtactics: You don't say... How Many Scientists Fabricate and Falsify Research? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Survey Da…
RT @frishee: How Many Scientists Fabricate and Falsify Research? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Survey Data https://t.co/sP6lLwn0…
How Many Scientists Fabricate and Falsify Research? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Survey Data https://t.co/sP6lLwn04i
RT @rs_goldstein: As students, we need empowerment and mechanisms to combat the rates of poor research practices, especially when 1 in 3 Sc…
RT @rs_goldstein: As students, we need empowerment and mechanisms to combat the rates of poor research practices, especially when 1 in 3 Sc…
RT @Dr_RReyes: "How Many Scientists Fabricate and Falsify Research? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Survey Data" by D. Fanelli. ht…
RT @Dr_RReyes: "How Many Scientists Fabricate and Falsify Research? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Survey Data" by D. Fanelli. ht…
"How Many Scientists Fabricate and Falsify Research? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Survey Data" by D. Fanelli. https://t.co/7rSdoPL6bW #Thesis #Plagiarism
@annakontula @Vasemmistoliito @pbyrokraatti @Jrvinen_J Nyt ei puhuta akateemisesta jonninjoutavasta nyhjäämisestä, vaan valehtelusta ja vedätyksestä. https://t.co/k7fSjG2LsG https://t.co/vRpJnHnCY3