PCA on 39 scientific impact measures shows a few clusters https://t.co/XMsvy6UobI https://t.co/Eyzo09oplT
@rnlanders Right, but IF is greatly affected by single articles. Anyway, the most important difference is the weighing system. https://t.co/Z3EFOu5mi1
Professor Johan Bollen’s paper has been selected to be included in the @PLOSONE anniversary collection! https://t.co/D6w3o9lnE1 https://t.co/qVE0XPrQYX
RT @jvrb_org: According to Johan Bollen et al.: Scientific impact is a multi-dimensional construct: https://t.co/Y5OZp8etfx
RT @jvrb_org: According to Johan Bollen et al.: Scientific impact is a multi-dimensional construct: https://t.co/Y5OZp8etfx
RT @jvrb_org: According to Johan Bollen et al.: Scientific impact is a multi-dimensional construct: https://t.co/Y5OZp8etfx
According to Johan Bollen et al.: Scientific impact is a multi-dimensional construct: https://t.co/Y5OZp8etfx
#PLOSONE study:"impact is a multi-dimensional construct that can not be adequately measured by any single indicator" https://t.co/tw2HVTLDr6
RT @SaraHaenzi: #PLOSONE: A Principal Component Analysis of 39 Scientific Impact Measures https://t.co/SfzcPoMd21
RT @SaraHaenzi: #PLOSONE: A Principal Component Analysis of 39 Scientific Impact Measures https://t.co/SfzcPoMd21
#PLOSONE: A Principal Component Analysis of 39 Scientific Impact Measures https://t.co/SfzcPoMd21
A Principal Component Analysis of 39 Scientific Impact Measures https://t.co/J9rZ0MsKay
@jlbollen, great paper and research in general! Are there followups to this? working on one now. :) https://t.co/y0SYtndqz3
A Principal Component Analysis of 39 Scientific Impact Measures https://t.co/jILCESAW0K #acwri #publishing #academia
Scientific impact is a multi-dimensional construct that can not be adequately measured by any single indicator. http://t.co/9GgQyuy10Z
Christine Casey, MD: Useful paper - A Principal Component Analysis of 39 Scientific Impact Measures: http://t.co/M9Pl1iXFWi #CSEPhilly2015
Christine Casey, MD: Useful paper - A Principal Component Analysis of 39 Scientific Impact Measures: http://t.co/M9Pl1iXFWi #CSEPhilly2015
Christine Casey, MD: Useful paper - A Principal Component Analysis of 39 Scientific Impact Measures: http://t.co/M9Pl1iXFWi #CSEPhilly2015
Christine Casey, MD: Useful paper - A Principal Component Analysis of 39 Scientific Impact Measures: http://t.co/M9Pl1iXFWi #CSEPhilly2015
@DrWorms @ProfLikeSubst @gbw42 yes, agreed, see http://t.co/6DQP4LPaSO too. Be interesting to see hedging strategy developed.
"scientific impact is a multi-dimensional construct that can not be adequately measured by any single indicator. "http://t.co/K77OBJVRbf
"scientific impact is a multi-dimensional construct that can not be adequately measured by any single indicator. "http://t.co/K77OBJVRbf
"scientific impact is a multi-dimensional construct that can not be adequately measured by any single indicator. "http://t.co/K77OBJVRbf
"scientific impact is a multi-dimensional construct that can not be adequately measured by any single indicator. "http://t.co/K77OBJVRbf
"scientific impact is a multi-dimensional construct that can not be adequately measured by any single indicator. "http://t.co/K77OBJVRbf
"scientific impact is a multi-dimensional construct that can not be adequately measured by any single indicator. "http://t.co/K77OBJVRbf
"scientific impact is a multi-dimensional construct that can not be adequately measured by any single indicator. "http://t.co/K77OBJVRbf
"scientific impact is a multi-dimensional construct that can not be adequately measured by any single indicator. "http://t.co/K77OBJVRbf
"scientific impact is a multi-dimensional construct that can not be adequately measured by any single indicator. "http://t.co/K77OBJVRbf
Look out, here it comes! Herbert van de Sompel on 39 Scientific Impact Measures based on citation and usage log data http://t.co/dVBMCchKNg
@fanseel Some background: http://t.co/pmv6qv8WAC - My tip: collaborate!
@MLBrook BTW, have you ever looked at the outputs of MESUR? http://t.co/vNLLhXOxMI
@dataronin @lukask @n_simons @atreloar Cringing is a sentiment. This is science: http://t.co/c3zXJnfP3b
Alhoori talks about comparing social reference based metrics to citation based metrics #tpdl2013 cites an older study http://t.co/dDxACVc1lx
PLOS ONE: A Principal Component Analysis of 39 Scientific Impact Measures http://t.co/9VpAJvmELd
PLoS ONE: A Principal Component Analysis of 39 Scientific Impact Measures http://t.co/QZWg1cUu4I
PLoS ONE: A Principal Component Analysis of 39 Scientific Impact Measures http://t.co/QZWg1cUu4I
Citations are overrated: “A principal component analysis of 39 #scientific #impact measures http://t.co/NvVDo1WLhH” /via @markuslanthaler
Citations are overrated: “A principal component analysis of 39 #scientific #impact measures http://t.co/NvVDo1WLhH” /via @markuslanthaler
For anyone in #academia definitely worth a read: A principal component analysis of 39 #scientific #impact measures http://t.co/fc3CePcP0G
“A principal component analysis of 39 scientific impact measures http://t.co/A3VA8mT8”
“A principal component analysis of 39 scientific impact measures http://t.co/A3VA8mT8”
@jayvanbavel "Impact is a multi-dimensional construct that can not be adequately measured by any single indicator" http://t.co/GqRCVKmd
@jayvanbavel "Impact is a multi-dimensional construct that can not be adequately measured by any single indicator" http://t.co/GqRCVKmd
Impact factor is overrated: A principal component analysis of 39 scientific impact measures http://t.co/5Alf3UAJ (via @communicating)
Impact factor is overrated: A principal component analysis of 39 scientific impact measures http://t.co/5Alf3UAJ (via @communicating)
El impacto de las publicaciones científicas: A principal component analysis of 39 scientific impact measures http://t.co/Bo1AMwj2
RT @johnnyfoxe: #PLOSONE: A Principal Component Analysis of 39 Scientific Impact Measures http://t.co/2F3Ea2K7
Factored out. Of all the measures of "impact", statistics suggests the impact factor is marginal. http://t.co/IZdn9nUN #science HT @hmason
RT @johnnyfoxe: #PLOSONE: A Principal Component Analysis of 39 Scientific Impact Measures http://t.co/2F3Ea2K7
Impact factor is overrated: A principal component analysis of 39 scientific impact measures http://t.co/5Alf3UAJ (via @communicating)
Impact factor is overrated: A principal component analysis of 39 scientific impact measures http://t.co/5Alf3UAJ (via @communicating)
Validità scientifica ricerca giudicata su Impact Factor in Italia misura marginale fra 39. Paese sempre all'avanguardia http://t.co/xbY8JePS
@BioMickWatson @hmason I linked to Arxiv but i originally found it on PlosOne. (http://t.co/ysgkWVKN)
#PLOSONE: A Principal Component Analysis of 39 Scientific Impact Measures http://t.co/rIzfrQNA
Impact factor is overrated: A principal component analysis of 39 scientific impact measures http://t.co/5Alf3UAJ (via @communicating)
NB! RT @hmason: Impact factor is overrated: A principal component analysis of 39 scientific impact measures http://t.co/4WKNVJDg HT @BoraZ
Impact factor is overrated: A principal component analysis of 39 scientific impact measures http://t.co/5Alf3UAJ (via @communicating)
Impact factor is overrated: A principal component analysis of 39 scientific impact measures http://t.co/5Alf3UAJ (via @communicating)
.@PLOSONE Journal Impact Factor located at periphery of 39 measures of impact. http://t.co/Wz1jdI9e
Impact factor is overrated: A principal component analysis of 39 scientific impact measures http://t.co/5Alf3UAJ (via @communicating)
#PLOSONE: A Principal Component Analysis of 39 Scientific Impact Measures http://t.co/rIzfrQNA
RT @hmason: Impact factor is overrated: Analysis of 39 scientific impact measures http://t.co/wkuEo30B (via @communicating)
Impact factor is overrated: A principal component analysis of 39 scientific impact measures http://t.co/5Alf3UAJ (via @communicating)
RT @hmason: Impact factor is overrated: A principal component analysis of 39 scientific impact measures http://t.co/5Alf3UAJ (via @communicating)
Finally! +1 RT @westr: NB! RT @hmason: Impact factor is overrated: Analysis of 39 scientific impact measures http://t.co/uxTrvSwW HT @BoraZ
.@PLOSONE Journal Impact Factor located at periphery of 39 measures of impact. http://t.co/Wz1jdI9e
.@PLOSONE Journal Impact Factor citation Impact Factor located at its periphery of 39 measures of impact. http://t.co/Wz1jdI9e
NB! RT @hmason: Impact factor is overrated: A principal component analysis of 39 scientific impact measures http://t.co/4WKNVJDg HT @BoraZ
RT @hmason: Impact factor is overrated: A principal component analysis of 39 scientific impact measures http://t.co/5Alf3UAJ (via @communicating)
Impact factor is overrated: A principal component analysis of 39 scientific impact measures http://t.co/5Alf3UAJ (via @communicating)
Impact factor is overrated: A principal component analysis of 39 scientific impact measures http://t.co/5Alf3UAJ (via @communicating)
Impact factor is overrated: A principal component analysis of 39 scientific impact measures http://t.co/5Alf3UAJ (via @communicating)
Impact factor is overrated: A principal component analysis of 39 scientific impact measures http://t.co/5Alf3UAJ (via @communicating)
“Impact factor is overrated" Understatement @hmason - Principal component analysis of scientific impact measures http://t.co/ZzgdG5cy
RT @hmason: Impact factor is overrated: A principal component analysis of 39 scientific impact measures http://t.co/5Alf3UAJ (via @communicating)
Beyond the Citation index http://t.co/vhVwdVwi
RT @hmason: Impact factor is overrated: Analysis of 39 scientific impact measures http://t.co/gHbNxidg via @communicating
Impact factor is overrated: A principal component analysis of 39 scientific impact measures http://t.co/5Alf3UAJ (via @communicating)
RT @hmason: Impact factor is overrated: A principal component analysis of 39 scientific impact measures http://t.co/5Alf3UAJ (via @communicating)
RT @vardi: A principal component analysis of 39 scientific impact measures http://t.co/GWAkJgja
#PLOSONE: a PC Analysis of 39 Scientific Impact Measures [Ccl: common IF overrated & should be used with caution] http://t.co/C17P8THF
Impact factor is overrated: A principal component analysis of 39 scientific impact measures http://t.co/5Alf3UAJ (via @communicating)
RT @hmason: Impact factor is overrated: A principal component analysis of 39 scientific impact measures http://t.co/FB3eihO5
Impact factor is overrated: A principal component analysis of 39 scientific impact measures http://t.co/5Alf3UAJ (via @communicating)
“@hmason: Impact factor is overrated: A principal component analysis of 39 scientific impact measures http://t.co/A3VA8mT8 "
[0902.2183] A principal component analysis of 39 scientific impact measures http://t.co/XAmeee7T, see more http://t.co/yzCeauKf
"Usage-based measures are stronger indicators of scientific prestige than many presently available citation measures." http://t.co/xYri9XkV
RT @openscience: "Usage-based measures are stronger indicators of scientific prestige than many presently available citation measures." http://t.co/fWAIkcyw
Impact factor is overrated: A principal component analysis of 39 scientific impact measures http://t.co/5Alf3UAJ (via @communicating)
[0902.2183] A principal component analysis of 39 scientific impact measures http://t.co/K1mlNUYM, see more http://t.co/YGAQq9fq
'Pinoystartup/data-science' Top: [0902.2183] A principal component analysis of 39 s… http://t.co/K1mlNUYM, see more http://t.co/toQcNd9I
Impact factor is overrated: A principal component analysis of 39 scientific impact measures http://t.co/5Alf3UAJ (via @communicating)
RT @hmason: Impact factor is overrated: A principal component analysis of 39 scientific impact measures http://t.co/oVU8ZnVh (via...
Impact factor is overrated: A principal component analysis of 39 scientific impact measures http://t.co/5Alf3UAJ (via @communicating)
Impact factor is overrated: A principal component analysis of 39 scientific impact measures http://t.co/5Alf3UAJ (via @communicating)
"Scientific impact is a multi-dimensional construct that cannot be adequately measured by any single indicator" http://t.co/Bt2bRrDE