↓ Skip to main content

PLOS

Global Value Trees

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, May 2015
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
7 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
39 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
44 Mendeley
Title
Global Value Trees
Published in
PLOS ONE, May 2015
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0126699
Pubmed ID
Authors

Zhen Zhu, Michelangelo Puliga, Federica Cerina, Alessandro Chessa, Massimo Riccaboni

Abstract

The fragmentation of production across countries has become an important feature of the globalization in recent decades and is often conceptualized by the term "global value chains" (GVCs). When empirically investigating the GVCs, previous studies are mainly interested in knowing how global the GVCs are rather than how the GVCs look like. From a complex networks perspective, we use the World Input-Output Database (WIOD) to study the evolution of the global production system. We find that the industry-level GVCs are indeed not chain-like but are better characterized by the tree topology. Hence, we compute the global value trees (GVTs) for all the industries available in the WIOD. Moreover, we compute an industry importance measure based on the GVTs and compare it with other network centrality measures. Finally, we discuss some future applications of the GVTs.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 44 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Netherlands 1 2%
Italy 1 2%
Unknown 42 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 25%
Researcher 8 18%
Student > Postgraduate 4 9%
Student > Master 4 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 7%
Other 8 18%
Unknown 6 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 19 43%
Business, Management and Accounting 3 7%
Social Sciences 3 7%
Mathematics 2 5%
Physics and Astronomy 2 5%
Other 8 18%
Unknown 7 16%