↓ Skip to main content

PLOS

Negative Emotional Events that People Ruminate about Feel Closer in Time

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, February 2015
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
2 blogs
twitter
10 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
20 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
72 Mendeley
Title
Negative Emotional Events that People Ruminate about Feel Closer in Time
Published in
PLOS ONE, February 2015
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0117105
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ewa Siedlecka, Miriam M. Capper, Thomas F. Denson

Abstract

Rumination is intrusive, perseverative cognition. We suggest that one psychological consequence of ruminating about negative emotional events is that the events feel as though they happened metaphorically "just yesterday". Results from three studies showed that ruminating about real world anger provocations, guilt-inducing events, and sad times in the last year made these past events feel as though they happened more recently. The relationship between rumination and reduced temporal psychological distance persisted even when controlling for when the event occurred and the emotional intensity of the event. Moreover, angry rumination was correlated with enhanced approach motivation, which mediated the rumination-distance relationship. The relationship between guilty rumination and distance was mediated by enhanced vividness. Construal level and taking a 3rd person perspective contributed to the sense of distance when participants were prompted to think about less emotionally charged situations. A meta-analysis of the data showed that the relationship between rumination and reduced distance was significant and twice as large as the same relationship for neutral events. These findings have implications for understanding the role of emotional rumination on memory processes in clinical populations and people prone to rumination. This research suggests that rumination may be a critical mechanism that keeps negative events close in the heart, mind, and time.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 72 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 1%
Unknown 71 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 24%
Student > Bachelor 10 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 10%
Researcher 5 7%
Student > Master 4 6%
Other 12 17%
Unknown 17 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 39 54%
Social Sciences 3 4%
Business, Management and Accounting 3 4%
Sports and Recreations 2 3%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 1%
Other 5 7%
Unknown 19 26%