↓ Skip to main content

PLOS

Activity-Based Funding of Hospitals and Its Impact on Mortality, Readmission, Discharge Destination, Severity of Illness, and Volume of Care: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, October 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

news
11 news outlets
policy
1 policy source
twitter
60 X users
facebook
6 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
85 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
228 Mendeley
Title
Activity-Based Funding of Hospitals and Its Impact on Mortality, Readmission, Discharge Destination, Severity of Illness, and Volume of Care: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Published in
PLOS ONE, October 2014
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0109975
Pubmed ID
Authors

Karen S. Palmer, Thomas Agoritsas, Danielle Martin, Taryn Scott, Sohail M. Mulla, Ashley P. Miller, Arnav Agarwal, Andrew Bresnahan, Afeez Abiola Hazzan, Rebecca A. Jeffery, Arnaud Merglen, Ahmed Negm, Reed A. Siemieniuk, Neera Bhatnagar, Irfan A. Dhalla, John N. Lavis, John J. You, Stephen J. Duckett, Gordon H. Guyatt

Abstract

Activity-based funding (ABF) of hospitals is a policy intervention intended to re-shape incentives across health systems through the use of diagnosis-related groups. Many countries are adopting or actively promoting ABF. We assessed the effect of ABF on key measures potentially affecting patients and health care systems: mortality (acute and post-acute care); readmission rates; discharge rate to post-acute care following hospitalization; severity of illness; volume of care.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 60 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 228 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Canada 3 1%
Norway 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 223 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 45 20%
Researcher 29 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 22 10%
Other 14 6%
Student > Bachelor 12 5%
Other 36 16%
Unknown 70 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 60 26%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 18 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 17 7%
Business, Management and Accounting 12 5%
Social Sciences 11 5%
Other 31 14%
Unknown 79 35%