↓ Skip to main content

PLOS

Impact of Walking on Glycemic Control and Other Cardiovascular Risk Factors in Type 2 Diabetes: A Meta-Analysis

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, October 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
policy
3 policy sources
twitter
28 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
90 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
247 Mendeley
Title
Impact of Walking on Glycemic Control and Other Cardiovascular Risk Factors in Type 2 Diabetes: A Meta-Analysis
Published in
PLOS ONE, October 2014
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0109767
Pubmed ID
Authors

Shanhu Qiu, Xue Cai, Uwe Schumann, Martina Velders, Zilin Sun, Jürgen Michael Steinacker

Abstract

Walking is the most popular and most preferred exercise among type 2 diabetes patients, yet compelling evidence regarding its beneficial effects on cardiovascular risk factors is still lacking. The aim of this meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) was to evaluate the association between walking and glycemic control and other cardiovascular risk factors in type 2 diabetes patients.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 28 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 247 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Arab Emirates 1 <1%
Indonesia 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 242 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 33 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 30 12%
Student > Bachelor 26 11%
Researcher 13 5%
Other 11 4%
Other 45 18%
Unknown 89 36%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 59 24%
Nursing and Health Professions 46 19%
Sports and Recreations 15 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 2%
Social Sciences 4 2%
Other 21 9%
Unknown 98 40%