↓ Skip to main content

PLOS

Quantifying Shark Distribution Patterns and Species-Habitat Associations: Implications of Marine Park Zoning

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, September 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

news
11 news outlets
blogs
3 blogs
policy
2 policy sources
twitter
50 X users
facebook
7 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
121 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
447 Mendeley
Title
Quantifying Shark Distribution Patterns and Species-Habitat Associations: Implications of Marine Park Zoning
Published in
PLOS ONE, September 2014
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0106885
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mario Espinoza, Mike Cappo, Michelle R. Heupel, Andrew J. Tobin, Colin A. Simpfendorfer

Abstract

Quantifying shark distribution patterns and species-specific habitat associations in response to geographic and environmental drivers is critical to assessing risk of exposure to fishing, habitat degradation, and the effects of climate change. The present study examined shark distribution patterns, species-habitat associations, and marine reserve use with baited remote underwater video stations (BRUVS) along the entire Great Barrier Reef Marine Park (GBRMP) over a ten year period. Overall, 21 species of sharks from five families and two orders were recorded. Grey reef Carcharhinus amblyrhynchos, silvertip C. albimarginatus, tiger Galeocerdo cuvier, and sliteye Loxodon macrorhinus sharks were the most abundant species (>64% of shark abundances). Multivariate regression trees showed that hard coral cover produced the primary split separating shark assemblages. Four indicator species had consistently higher abundances and contributed to explaining most of the differences in shark assemblages: C. amblyrhynchos, C. albimarginatus, G. cuvier, and whitetip reef Triaenodon obesus sharks. Relative distance along the GBRMP had the greatest influence on shark occurrence and species richness, which increased at both ends of the sampling range (southern and northern sites) relative to intermediate latitudes. Hard coral cover and distance across the shelf were also important predictors of shark distribution. The relative abundance of sharks was significantly higher in non-fished sites, highlighting the conservation value and benefits of the GBRMP zoning. However, our results also showed that hard coral cover had a large effect on the abundance of reef-associated shark species, indicating that coral reef health may be important for the success of marine protected areas. Therefore, understanding shark distribution patterns, species-habitat associations, and the drivers responsible for those patterns is essential for developing sound management and conservation approaches.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 50 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 447 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
South Africa 3 <1%
Australia 3 <1%
Cuba 1 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Iceland 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 434 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 77 17%
Researcher 68 15%
Student > Bachelor 68 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 58 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 21 5%
Other 51 11%
Unknown 104 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 191 43%
Environmental Science 105 23%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 12 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 2%
Social Sciences 3 <1%
Other 15 3%
Unknown 114 26%