↓ Skip to main content

PLOS

SSU rDNA Divergence in Planktonic Foraminifera: Molecular Taxonomy and Biogeographic Implications

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, August 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
59 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
79 Mendeley
Title
SSU rDNA Divergence in Planktonic Foraminifera: Molecular Taxonomy and Biogeographic Implications
Published in
PLOS ONE, August 2014
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0104641
Pubmed ID
Authors

Aurore André, Frédéric Quillévéré, Raphaël Morard, Yurika Ujiié, Gilles Escarguel, Colomban de Vargas, Thibault de Garidel-Thoron, Christophe J. Douady

Abstract

The use of planktonic foraminifera in paleoceanography requires taxonomic consistency and precise assessment of the species biogeography. Yet, ribosomal small subunit (SSUr) DNA analyses have revealed that most of the modern morpho-species of planktonic foraminifera are composed of a complex of several distinct genetic types that may correspond to cryptic or pseudo-cryptic species. These genetic types are usually delimitated using partial sequences located at the 3'end of the SSUrDNA, but typically based on empirical delimitation. Here, we first use patristic genetic distances calculated within and among genetic types of the most common morpho-species to show that intra-type and inter-type genetic distances within morpho-species may significantly overlap, suggesting that genetic types have been sometimes inconsistently defined. We further apply two quantitative and independent methods, ABGD (Automatic Barcode Gap Detection) and GMYC (General Mixed Yule Coalescent) to a dataset of published and newly obtained partial SSU rDNA for a more objective assessment of the species status of these genetic types. Results of these complementary approaches are highly congruent and lead to a molecular taxonomy that ranks 49 genetic types of planktonic foraminifera as genuine (pseudo)cryptic species. Our results advocate for a standardized sequencing procedure allowing homogenous delimitations of (pseudo)cryptic species. On the ground of this revised taxonomic framework, we finally provide an integrative taxonomy synthesizing geographic, ecological and morphological differentiations that can occur among the genuine (pseudo)cryptic species. Due to molecular, environmental or morphological data scarcities, many aspects of our proposed integrative taxonomy are not yet fully resolved. On the other hand, our study opens up the potential for a correct interpretation of environmental sequence datasets.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 79 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 79 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 20 25%
Researcher 20 25%
Student > Master 8 10%
Student > Bachelor 6 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 5%
Other 9 11%
Unknown 12 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 30 38%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 14 18%
Environmental Science 9 11%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 8%
Social Sciences 2 3%
Other 2 3%
Unknown 16 20%