↓ Skip to main content

PLOS

Evidence for Prehistoric Origins of Egyptian Mummification in Late Neolithic Burials

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, August 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

news
57 news outlets
blogs
13 blogs
twitter
89 X users
facebook
12 Facebook pages
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages
googleplus
5 Google+ users

Readers on

mendeley
91 Mendeley
Title
Evidence for Prehistoric Origins of Egyptian Mummification in Late Neolithic Burials
Published in
PLOS ONE, August 2014
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0103608
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jana Jones, Thomas F. G. Higham, Ron Oldfield, Terry P. O'Connor, Stephen A. Buckley

Abstract

Traditional theories on ancient Egyptian mummification postulate that in the prehistoric period (i.e. the Neolithic and Chalcolithic periods, 5th and 4th millennia B.C.) bodies were naturally desiccated through the action of the hot, dry desert sand. Although molding of the body with resin-impregnated linen is believed to be an early Pharaonic forerunner to more complex processes, scientific evidence for the early use of resins in artificial mummification has until now been limited to isolated occurrences during the late Old Kingdom (c. 2200 B.C.), their use becoming more apparent during the Middle Kingdom (c. 2000-1600 BC). We examined linen wrappings from bodies in securely provenanced tombs (pit graves) in the earliest recorded ancient Egyptian cemeteries at Mostagedda in the Badari region (Upper Egypt). Our investigations of these prehistoric funerary wrappings using a combination of gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS) and thermal desorption/pyrolysis (TD/Py)-GC-MS have identified a pine resin, an aromatic plant extract, a plant gum/sugar, a natural petroleum source, and a plant oil/animal fat in directly AMS-dated funerary wrappings. Predating the earliest scientific evidence by more than a millennium, these embalming agents constitute complex, processed recipes of the same natural products, in similar proportions, as those utilized at the zenith of Pharaonic mummification some 3,000 years later. The antibacterial properties of some of these ingredients and the localized soft-tissue preservation that they would have afforded lead us to conclude that these represent the very beginnings of experimentation that would evolve into the famous mummification practice of the Pharaonic period.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 89 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 91 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Belgium 1 1%
Canada 1 1%
Brazil 1 1%
Unknown 88 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 18 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 16%
Researcher 14 15%
Student > Bachelor 8 9%
Student > Postgraduate 5 5%
Other 14 15%
Unknown 17 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Arts and Humanities 23 25%
Chemistry 11 12%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 9%
Social Sciences 6 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 7%
Other 19 21%
Unknown 18 20%