↓ Skip to main content

PLOS

Reward-Priming of Location in Visual Search

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, July 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
50 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
103 Mendeley
Title
Reward-Priming of Location in Visual Search
Published in
PLOS ONE, July 2014
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0103372
Pubmed ID
Authors

Clayton Hickey, Leonardo Chelazzi, Jan Theeuwes

Abstract

Existing visual search research has demonstrated that the receipt of reward will be beneficial for subsequent perceptual and attentional processing of features that have characterized targets, but detrimental for processing of features that have characterized irrelevant distractors. Here we report a similar effect of reward on location. Observers completed a visual search task in which they selected a target, ignored a salient distractor, and received random-magnitude reward for correct performance. Results show that when target selection garnered rewarding outcome attention is subsequently a.) primed to return to the target location, and b.) biased away from the location that was occupied by the salient, task-irrelevant distractor. These results suggest that in addition to priming features, reward acts to guide visual search by priming contextual locations of visual stimuli.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 103 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 2%
France 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Unknown 97 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 28 27%
Student > Master 16 16%
Student > Bachelor 15 15%
Student > Postgraduate 12 12%
Researcher 7 7%
Other 9 9%
Unknown 16 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 59 57%
Neuroscience 11 11%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 4%
Engineering 2 2%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 2%
Other 3 3%
Unknown 22 21%